A PICTURE IS WORTH A THOUSAND WORDS..............
 
 
 


 
Is That Yahoo Or AR Yahoo?
 
We Regret To Inform You Of Another Gamefowl List Deletion From Yahoo........
 
Not Just A Gamefowl List, But A GAMEFOWL BREEDERS List........
 
GamefowlBreeders Is No More, Removed From The Yahoo Rolls......
For the discussion and Breeding techniques of the Gamecock...for lovers of gamechickens...If you love Roosters then join this list and we can combine our experiences for the good of all(Including beginners) Come and advertise your chickens too...anything to bring this list alive, make it enjoyable, and helpful to enthusiasts.
http://groups.yahoo.com/search?query=gamefowlbreeders&submit=Search
 
Should We Attribute This Breach Of The First Amendment To
Some Little Cry Baby Dunghill Vegan Anarchist,
A Former Member Of ALF,
A Convicted Criminal And Supporter Of "Domestic Terrorism",
A Paid Employee Of Those Who Would Enslave You In A Utilitarian Society And Kill Off Your Chickens,
Or Some Other Lower Life Form?
 
 

 
Would A More Accurate Title Be
"AR Tackle Gamefowl Breeders On The Way To Attacking All Other Animal Breeders"?
 
STATES TACKLE COCKFIGHTING:
More than a dozen anti-cockfighting bills are pending in state
legislatures. In Oregon, where cockfighting is currently a misdemeanor, a
bill that would raise the penalties to a felony and would make the
possession of fighting birds illegal passed the House by a vote of 45 – 9
and is headed to the Senate. Oregon’s current law contains a glaring
loophole that allows the breeding of fighting birds, allowing gamecock
farms to turn tremendous profits while supplying the barbaric and largely
illegal cockfighting industry. The Maryland House unanimously passed (140
to 0) a bill to make various aspects of cockfighting—possession of
fighting animals, using one's property for fights, and being a spectator
at a cockfight—a felony offense.  In New Mexico, one of two states where
cockfighting remains legal, the state House passed a bill 45 - 21 to ban
cockfighting and make it a felony.  Legislation is also pending in
Arkansas (H.B. 2190), California (S.B. 732), Colorado (S.B. 65), Florida
(H.B. 1429 & S.B. 2350), Hawaii (S.B. 1581), Illinois (H.B. 1089 & S.B.
387), Iowa (H.F. 76), Minnesota (H.F. 28 & S.F. 126), and Nebraska (L.B.
273). There’s also a pro-cockfighting measure in one state. In Oklahoma,
pro-cockfighting legislators are pushing a bill, S.B. 835, to gut the
penalties for the recent, voter-approved ballot initiative that outlawed
cockfighting and made it a felony.  Contact your state legislators in
reference to these important bills. You can look up the contact
information and names of your legislators at all levels of government at
http://action.fund.org/directory/.
 
 

 
Forwarded To Us By An Informed American With The Comment..........
 
History In The Making, The Beginning Of The Next Wave Of The Utilitarianistic Vegan AR Agenda!
 
From An In The Defense Of Animals Alert........
 
 

Rhode Island residents please read and take action

A Historic Vote For Animal Companions Is Imminent

On Wednesday, March 26th, the Health, Education and Welfare Committee of the Rhode Island House, will vote on HB 5817, a measure sponsored by Representative Peter L. Lewiss and others, which would vastly improve the protections and treatment of animals in Rhode Island.

The bill, called the Rhode Island Animal Protection Act, creates the new crime of "Animal Abuse" with much more severe penalties than those under current "Animal Cruelty" statutes. Among its many strong provisions the bill would:
Create felony animal abuse and sexual assault charges resulting in stiff jail time and financial penalties;

- Allow trained SPCA and other animal welfare representatives to act as law enforcement officers in response to animal neglect and abuse cases;

- Ban bodily alterations, disablements or removals done to animals “except as necessary for proper veterinary care or population control”;

- Ban sport animal fighting and impose severe consequences for participating in it;

- Set procedures to take all animals away from convicted abusers and prohibit them from keeping any new ones,

- Set high financial penalties, including possible large punitive and emotional damage awards, for the abuse, and especially the killing, of an animal companion;

- Require that detailed information about convicted animal-abusing criminals be given to law enforcement, schools, animal welfare and other agencies so abusers can be tracked and deterred from harming animals and/or people again.

This excellent bill is already being threatened with a flood of negative emails due to national action alerts posted by industries that are exploitive of animals.

It is crucial that
Rhode Island residents contact the committee members below, saying loudly and clearly that we want this bill to reach the House floor and be passed into law...................

www.idausa.org


 
Should We Call This Southern Fried Chickens, Or Southern AR Dunghill Delight?
 
.......They even tried to pay PETA $10,000 to say it never happened.”.......
 
Dixie Chicks dodged PETA-fed fire  
Plus: Oscar parties pooping out; goody bag befitting a Queen
 
March 20 —  The Dixie Chicks — who took a lot of heat after one member of the group made anti-Bush comments — narrowly averted another controversy with some of their red-blooded fans. The Scoop was startled to learn that the country and western crooners posed for one of those “I’d Rather Go Naked Than Wear Fur” ads for People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals — but the ad was never released.
 
       THE TRIO POSED in a field of flowers, wearing nothing but blossoms and their strategically placed instruments. A photo of the ad can be seen on the photographer’s Web site, sebreephoto.com.
       It turns out that the Chicks are staunch animal-rights supporters, but at the last minute the group’s management put the kibosh on the ad. “The Chicks themselves were lovely about the whole thing, but their management got worried that some of their fans were rifle-toting, Bambi-shooting types who would take offense at an anti-fur, pro-animal message,” says a source. “They forbid release of the ad because they were worried about backlash or boycott. They even tried to pay PETA $10,000 to say it never happened.”
       The Chicks’ spokeswoman didn’t return calls for comment.
       “They are the Dixie Chicks, not the Stepford Wives,” says a PETA spokesman, who confirms that the singers posed for the ad but declined further comment. “Agree with them or not, this trio became a phenomenon because they have country hearts with modern sensibilities and aren’t afraid to voice their views. And we hope that one day they’ll let us release this ad.”
 
 
Courtesy: Karen S.