How Is Local, State, And Federal Government Reacting To AR With Reference To Gamefowl And Gamefowl Activity?
Is Government Reaction To AR Attempted Infringement Upon Your Rights Causing........
.......private property be taken for public use, without just compensation........
..........excessive fines imposed..........
..........unusual punishments inflicted..........
 

Amendment V

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

Amendment VIII

Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.billofrights.html#amendmentv


 
Re: Gamefowl News Report Wed 23 Apr 2003
 
Tilting at justice in Florida?
Opinions Of Some Of The Concerned Americans Who Attended The.........
04/22/03 SENATE CS by Agriculture; YEAS  8  NAYS  0
 
 
For anyone who doesn't know who O.G. is, my name is Orlando Riera-Gomez.  I am acting chairman of the Florida APG.  All of you who know me understand why I very seldom submit articles in a public forum.  It is difficult to project a positive viewpoint in written form consistently. And one that the animal rights extremists don't take advantage of.  In most cases the articles end up as criticism of someone or some action that has been taken.

Hopefully I can get through this without criticizing anyone or anyone's attempt to stop the Florida law.  First, I thank everyone who attended the Senate Ag Hearings on Tuesday in Tallahassee.  Everything we can do to convince the Florida Legislature that SB 2350 and HB 1911 are bad bills, is needed and appreciated.  If anyone expects me to apologize for being honest with the Florida Legislature, they will have a long wait.  My credibility is and was never in question.  The Florida Legislature knows full well who I am and what I stand for.  I am not ashamed to be a Florida cocker.  For far too long too many good cockers have sat by and done little.  Again, I appreciate everyone who is helping.

While I certainly do not have all the answers, I can tell you for sure that Tuesday's Ag Committee was not going to be influenced by the very few people who attended that hearing.  Likewise, this legislation will probably pass the Florida House and Senate if everyone doesn't become involved.  The gamefowl industry has flourished in Florida since the 1500s.  St. Augustine, the oldest city in America, was a cocking center.  Floridians have produced gamefowl for commercial purposes for centuries.  Now an uninformed Florida Legislature will put an end to that agricultural industry.  They have not even considered the state's liability for the more than two million birds that will have to be destroyed.  They have also not considered or heard from the stores and distributors of hardware, wire, health and other products, feed stores, and feed distributors who will lose a significant portion of their businesses if gamefowl ownership is banned.

The APG estimates the cost to the state of Florida is from $200 to $1500 per bird.  There are well more than two million birds in Florida.  At an estimated low average cost of $500 per bird, it will cost the state of Florida
$1,000,000,000.  In a tight budget year, where are they going to get the money?  And we have not even factored in the loss of income to businesses and loss of tax dollars to the state of Florida.  There are many other reasons the state should not pass these two bad bills, such as the loss of individual freedom to name only one.

What can you do to help?  We have very little time.  You must take action now.  It will take every feed store and supplier in our state to fax letters in opposition to SB 2350 and HB 1911.  It will take each and every one of us who own gamefowl to do the same.  You must ask your representative and senator to please stop these bills.  The Senate and the House have taken shortcuts and not allowed the bills to go though the full committee process.  The bills have been withdrawn or the system manipulated so that our voices would not be heard. 

Besides writing a letter to your personal Senator or Representative, you should write the Senate President, Jim King, and the House Speaker, Johnny Byrd.  Please get your letters out and get your local businesses to do the same.  You have until about April 28 to have this all done.  If not, you will probably lose your gamefowl.  Sorry, the list of Senators and House Members is too long to put here.  Just check your local phone book for their contact information.

I am sure if this bill passes in Florida, there will be a lot of outcry and finger pointing.  I can guarantee you that the APG has a plan and will do everything it can to stop this bill.  Likewise, the other two Florida groups will not be at fault if this law passes.  The only blame that can be placed will be on those who did nothing.  Quit criticizing each other and lets work together to defeat this year's enemy, SB 2350 and HB 1911.

Senate President Jim King
Capitol Office:
Suite 409
The Capitol
404 South Monroe Street
Tallahassee, FL
32399-1100
(850) 487-5030
SunCom 277-5030
Fax (850) 487-5368
Fax SunCom 277-5368
Email: 
king.james.web@flsenate.gov

House Speaker Johnny Byrd
Capitol Office:
420 Capitol
402 South Monroe Street
Tallahassee, FL 32399-1300
Phone: (850) 488-0807
Email: 
speakerbyrd@myfloridahouse.com
 
 
Florida 2002-2004 Senators By Last Name 
http://www.flsenate.gov/Legislators/index.cfm?Chamber=Senate&Submenu=1&Tab=Legislators
 
Florida 2002-2004 House Members
For Member information, view the Provisional Directory
http://www.leg.state.fl.us/house/Legislators/Legislators.html



 
Texas..........
 
...............A seller, distributor, or transporter of live domestic or exotic fowl in this state shall register with the commission under this section..........
 
 
Subject: Urgent Legislative Alert for Texas HB2328...Exotic birds

URGENT LEGISLATIVE ALERT FOR TEXAS....HB 2328....RE EXOTICS   4-24-03

The American Federation of Aviculture is alerting all owners and breeders of exotic birds about pending legislation in Texas. HB 2328 has been written as an attempt to manage outbreaks such as END and other diseases and would regulate all poultry and exotic birds in Texas. This bill has been through a public hearing and is ready for passage by the Texas House and Senate. Texas poultry associations are mounting a strong campaign in support. Immediate response is needed to both your state senators and representative. Exotic birds are not managed like poultry. They are not free-ranging but always securely contained. Exotic birds are now regulated under the Animal Welfare Act (AWA), as amended by the Helms Amendment to the Farm Bill, on Feb. 28, 2002. Regulations will be implemented by the USDA, APHIS, Animal Care Division and require routine permits and inspections.

Following are quotes from the text of HB 2328:
Sec.161.0411. DOMESTIC AND EXOTIC FOWL REGISTRATION.
(a) A seller, distributor, or transporter of live domestic or exotic fowl in this state shall register with the commission under this section.
(b) A person may apply for a certificate of registration or a renewal of a certificate of registration under this section by submitting an application and an annual fee prescribed by the commission.  A person must complete an application for a certificate of registration that includes a list of each location at which the person conducts the sale, distribution, or transportation of domestic or exotic fowl.
(c) The commission shall adopt rules to administer this section, including rules relating to the testing, identification, transportation, inspection, sanitation, and disinfection of domestic and exotic fowl.
(d) The commission shall prescribe and collect an annual fee for registration as a seller, distributor, or transporter of domestic and exotic fowl.
There are other sections which describe failure to follow the regulations as an offense that is a Class C misdemeanor, and provides for a start date of January 1, 2004 for the Texas Animal Health Commission to adopt rules to administer this section of the Agriculture Code. The bill's authors are  McReynolds. Homer, Hughes and Hardcastle.

For complete text and information on this bill visit: http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/tlo/legislation/bill_status.htm
For information on your district representative's address and phone numbers, visit:
http://www.capital.state.tx.us/tlo/house/house.htm
       Then click on Members.
       Then click on List of Capitol and District Office Addresses.
For information on your district senator's address and phone numbers, visit:
http://www.capital.state.tx.us/tlo/senate/senate.htm
       Then click on Members.  Then click on List of Capitol and District Office Addresses

For further information contact: LauraDesborough@aol.com  phone: 904-291-9043

Courtesy: [A_C_T_I_O_N]
 

 
Could We Consider A Mainstay Of The Vegan AR Anti-Human Agenda To Be.........
...........a trumped-up charge........
 
 
Cowboy's Arrest Spurs $46M Lawsuit

By Rocco Parascandola
STAFF WRITER

April 23, 2003

A Brooklyn cowboy is accusing an investigator on the popular "Animal Precinct," the cable TV show that follows ASPCA agents in search of animal abuse, of busting him on a trumped-up charge, costing him his horse and his job.

Rossano Case-Irwin says special investigator Annemarie Lucas hammed it up for "Animal Precinct," harassing him about a minor friction wound on his horse's belly, then arresting him on animal cruelty charges.

Case-Irwin, 44, was acquitted at trial in Queens, and now he is suing Lucas, the ASPCA, the TV show and the network for $46 million in a wrongful arrest suit in Brooklyn.

"Lucas harassed me every day, and she had the cameras rolling every day," Case-Irwin said. "But there was no abuse."

Worse, Case-Irwin says in the suit, even after he was acquitted, "Animal Planet," the cable channel on which "Animal Precinct" airs, kept running the episode, subjecting him to "ridicule, embarrassment, vexation and humiliation."

Neither Lucas nor her partner, special agent Joanne Sandano, answered requests for comment. Larry Rosen, a lawyer for the ASPCA, said the jury verdict does not mean he was wrongly arrested.

Case-Irwin, who is married with four kids, works as a bodyguard. As a hobby, he dresses as a cowboy and was a member of the Federation of Black Cowboys, a group he says he quit because they did not stand by him.

In the summer of 2001, investigators showed up at the Linden Stables in Ozone Park after getting an anonymous tip that Case-Irwins' Thoroughbred mix, Kenya, was not being cared for properly.

Case-Irwin says Kenya had suffered a girth sore, a friction wound from a saddle strap. He says it was healing, but Lucas insisted a veterinarian be called.

He says even after the vet told Lucas the animal did not require a doctor's care she continued harassing him and vowed to "get him." She later arrested him, and that incident was broadcast, as well as the events leading up to it.

Case-Irwin says he then lost his job loading trucks for a beer company.

"This woman had a vendetta against me," Case-Irwin says of Lucas. "She was performing for the camera."

Regardless of the outcome of the suit, Case-Irwin is trying to get back Kenya, who was taken from him after he signed the horse over to the agency, though he says he was tricked into doing so. Kenya is now living on an upstate farm.

"I have not seen her and I don't know how she's doing," Case-Irwin says. "If I got my horse back today my enthusiasm would come right back."

Copyright © 2003, Newsday, Inc.

 
Source: http://www.newsday.com/mynews/ny-nyplan233250050apr23,0,3483510.story
 

 
Could We Consider A Mainstay Of The Vegan AR Anti-Human Agenda To Be.........
...........passed on to a national animal welfare campaigning group........
 
----- Original Message -----
From: "United Poultry Concerns" <info@upc-online.org>
To: <upc@envirolink.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2003 10:31 AM
Subject: ANIMAL RIGHTS ACTIVISTS 'LIBERATE' BATTERY HENS
United Poultry Concerns E-List                             
(To be removed, visit http://www.UPC-online.org/email)     

ANIMAL RIGHTS ACTIVISTS 'LIBERATE' BATTERY HENS
The Independent, Michael McCarthy, 24 April 2003
http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/environment/story.jsp?story=399831

More than 1,000 battery hens have been "liberated" in a raid on a chicken farm, animal rights activists claimed yesterday. The birds were removed from the farm in two horse boxes and have now been given homes as "companion animals" with sympathisers, the Animal Liberation Front said. The raid happened during the Easter weekend at Wallops Wood Farm in Droxford, Hampshire, when 16 balaclava-clad activists broke into farm buildings and removed the chickens. Hampshire police said they were investigating a burglary at the farm, where extensive damage had been caused and some poultry had been released.No one from the farm was available for comment.

Robin Webb, a spokesman for the Animal Liberation Front, said the raid was "to highlight the cruelty of the battery system, which has been condemned by every government committee of inquiry since the Bramble report of 1965". Mr Webb alleged that hens at the farm had fallen out of their cages and were living in deep piles of chicken droppings. Some had died in their own droppings, he said, adding that the activists had made a video of conditions at the farm which would be passed on to a national animal welfare campaigning group. Mr Webb said that the raiders had taken away 1,023 hens. He said: "They will be re-homed in places where they will be treated as companion animals and they will live out their natural life span." The activists had damaged the caging system, conveyor belts and feeding apparatus and left slogans painted on the walls, Mr Webb said.

The EU has passed a new law to phase out battery cages, which comes into effect in 2012. So far, the British Government has declined to act unilaterally.

 
Will The Vegan AR Anti-Human Agenda Continue To Teach Our Children Animal Rights  In Public Schools And To Infringe Upon The Rights Of Others By Continually Attempting To Stop The Teaching Of All Animal Agriculture Programs?
 
 
Animal rights group wants UA to cut animal sciences program

By Bob Purvis
Arizona Daily Wildcat
Tuesday April 22, 2003

In a letter addressed to UA President Pete Likins last month, the leader of a national animal rights organization said he would not rest until a specific UA program is abolished.

The letter, from Executive Director of Responsible Policies for Animals David Cantor, contained a questionnaire regarding the school’s animal sciences and called on school officials to ban the teaching of animal agriculture.

“Preventing needless animal suffering and deaths is reason enough for universities to stop teaching animal agriculture,” the letter stated.

Cantor called for an immediate halt to the animal sciences program in the letter, writing, “All involved are linked to those atrocities since all activities in the animal and agribusiness industries, including education and training, are interrelated.”

RPA condemns the program’s ties to the meat packing industry and says that the department promotes killing animals short of their natural life span. In his letter Cantor pleaded with Likins to find compassion for the “ten billion (animals) killed for food each year.”

The UA’s campus agriculture center on the 5000 block of North Campbell Avenue does have a USDA inspected meat sciences center, which instructs primarily on product development.

Animal sciences department head Robert Collier, however, said Cantor’s efforts are misguided and more of an attack on animal consumption than animal mistreatment at UA.

“I don’t think they really understand what they are talking about,” Collier said.

He said that the research done by animal sciences actually aims to benefit animals, specifically their research on animals in arid lands.

“Our research is oriented around diets. It’s really oriented around improving the animal’s lifestyles,” Collier said.

UA’s agricultural center houses over 360 dairy cows and 50 horses, among other animals, according to the Department of Animal Sciences’ Web site.

UA’s animal sciences program focuses on two types of degrees: veterinary medicine and research. Enrollment in the college has increased in recent years, including an 80 percent female enrollment, changing the face of animal sciences, Collier said,

With UA’s programs in mind, Collier also said Cantor’s vision of a commercial animal-free world is unattainable.

“A large part of the land you can’t grow cereal rices on, and a lot of essential amino acids come from animal products,” he said.

Still, Cantor insisted Likins not dedicate university funding to the “atrocities” of the animal agriculture business.

“Teaching animal agriculture primarily serves the interests of large private corporations, whose activities are extremely harmful yet profitable and not in the public interest — they should be training their own workers and managers, not relying on university agriculture programs to do so,” Cantor said

The letter was part of the 10,000 Years is Enough program, RPA’s long-term program aimed at bringing an end to the teaching of animal agriculture in public universities.

As of yesterday Cantor had sent 20 similar letters to other universities.

Likins has not responded to the letter, Cantor said.

Cantor said he was disappointed by Likins’ failure to communicate with him.

“One of the key functions of universities in the United States is to serve as venues for the free marketplace of ideas. For universities to fail to examine their animal-agriculture policies, discuss them openly, and reckon with the harm they are doing would be a terrible disservice to the public,” Cantor said.

Likins was not available for comment at the time of publication.


Source: http://wildcat.arizona.edu/papers/96/138/01_1.html





 
And Again The AR Bring You The Reputed Cockfightingless Den?
 
 

Officers raid reputed cockfighting den

By Jim Welte-Half Moon Bay Review--Photo by Jim Welte

As Sgt. Steve Frias of the Peninsula Human Society prepared to cut the padlock off the door of a dilapidated shack near the eastern edge of Grandview Boulevard, he announced that he was serving a search warrant on the property.

In doing so, he had to raise his voice above the screeching din of 45 squawking roosters.

Acting on a tip by Bert Silva, who rents an adjacent piece of land, PHS officials raided the shack Thursday afternoon. Once inside, they found a maze of tiny stalls - subdivided by chicken wire - containing several dozen roosters that authorities said were bred for cockfighting.

According to Frias, PHS officials investigated the shack for several weeks prior to the raid, but no suspects have been identified. Frias and his crew seized 45 roosters, and will hold them for 14 days in the hopes that their owner will come forward to claim them.

"But we don't expect that will happen," he said.

Although some state lawmakers have made overtures to make owning or raising fighting cocks a felony in California, the crime is currently only a misdemeanor. It is, however, a felony in many states throughout the country.

If no owner comes forward, Frias said, the animals will be "humanely destroyed."

Silva, who has leased the land from John Podesta for approximately two years, denied any involvement in the operation, saying, "I don't deal with chickens."

He said that he knew the animals were being kept in the shack, but that he never went back there and never wanted to bother finding out who owned them and why for fear of retribution.

"I don't deal with those kinds of people," he said. "And the only chickens I deal with are at Safeway."

Someone had apparently attempted to steal some of the animals, Silva said, causing their owners to position a loud guard dog at the entrance to the shack.

"If they hadn't put the dog up there, they probably wouldn't have ever gotten caught," Silva said.

Several complaints by nearby residents went first through the Half Moon Bay Police Department to the city's code enforcement officer, Sean Flanagan, who forwarded the case to PHS officials.

Led to the site by Half Moon Bay Police, PHS officials slogged through the muddy terrain adjacent to a daisy field to reach the shack, approximately a half-mile east of Highway 1 just north of Grandview Boulevard.

Once Frias pried the padlock, officials discovered that their initial estimates of 20-25 roosters inside fell short by about half.

"Based on the inherent nature of the animals, that they are very aggressive and are bred for fighting, it is very rare that we find cases like this on view," Frias said.

The shack also contained key evidence that the animals had been used in cockfights, illegal contests on which spectators potentially wage thousands of dollars, according to PHS field supervisor Laurie Feazell.

"We know this is happening throughout the county, but it's rare that we find a setup like this," Feazell said. "A lot of people are afraid to come forward if it's their neighbors who are doing it."

Frias noted that several of the roosters were missing the spurs on their talons. He said that suggests that they had been removed to be replaced by sharpened metal spurs or blades during the cockfights. The insertion of the blades, Frias said, means that most of the cockfights end when one of the combatants kills the other.

PHS officials did not find any blades or spurs.

They did, however, find injectable steroids and B vitamins, syringes, machetes and tethers that could be used to lead roosters to and from the cockfighting "ring," or stage. Feazell was unable to conclusively identify an area used to stage the cockfights.

Many of the roosters in the shack had the combs removed from their heads, which Frias said was done to give a "sportier look to the animal for fighting."

All of the animals, including several hens, appeared in good health, Frias said.

According to Eric Sakach, director of the West Coast region of the Humane Society of the United States, cockfighting is a high-stakes affair these days, particularly in California.

Arizona and Nevada have made the sport a felony, he said, but efforts to increase the charge from a misdemeanor to felony in California have been stifled.

A bill proposed by state Sen. Nell Soto, D-Pomona, would have made a conviction for participation in cockfighting a "wobbler" offense, meaning that a greater degree of one's participation could make it a felony.

Despite nearly universal support, the bill, SB 732, stalled in the Senate's Public Safety Committee, which instead revised the bill to include a mandatory jail term of six months if it was the offender's second conviction of the crime. The bill is still pending in the Legislature.

Sakach said the revised bill would not be a deterrent.

"We see the same faces year after year," he said. "They consider a small fine just the cost of doing business."

Source: http://www.hmbreview.com/display/inn_news/Local_News/story01.txt


 
Church Of The Anti-Human Alive And Well And Feeding On COMPASSION?
 
 
How PETA Marks Easter and Passover

Apparently not satisfied by alienating all of Judaism with its recent high-profile, roving exhibit comparing Holocaust victims to farm animals, the lunatics at People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) have moved on to other challenges. Next stop: offend as many Christians as possible.

Religious leaders in Pensacola, Florida immediately objected last week when PETA erected a billboard during Holy Week claiming that the way to "follow" Jesus Christ is to "go vegetarian." One local rabbi told the Associated Press that the historical Jesus was actually a meat-eater. "There's no evidence that Jesus was [a vegetarian]," he told The Pensacola News Journal. "This is totally out of left field."

Similar reactions came from Christian leaders in Savannah, Georgia, who were subjected to the same tasteless billboard. Jesus "celebrated Passover his entire life," one Baptist minister told The Savannah Morning News. "To do that, you have to eat lamb."

Of course, even the harshest rebuke is good news for PETA, which operates on the theory that "there's no such thing as bad publicity." They weren't so lucky in North Carolina, where an outdoor advertising company refused to sell space for PETA's other Christianity-themed sign. This one featured a 12-foot-tall photograph of a pig, along with the words: "He Died For Your Sins. Go Vegetarian." We're not making this up.

North Carolina advertising executives were not impressed. One told The News & Observer: "It's not a true statement, so why would we choose as a company to put it out there?" Another told The Minneapolis Star-Tribune: "In my mind only one person died for our sins. And it's not a pig."

At the center of this latest propaganda campaign is Bruce Friedrich, the PETA campaign director who told a 2001 animal-rights convention that "blowing stuff up and smashing windows" is "a great way to bring about animal liberation." These are not exactly Christian values. Still, PETA has given Friedrich his own "Christian Mercy" website, hailing him as "the most influential animal welfare advocate the Christian community has produced" in generations.

Is this sacrilege? Blasphemy? You be the judge. All publicity stunts aside, we'd like to offer the following Bible passages to counteract the next PETA-phile who tries to claim that Jesus of Nazareth was a meat-shunning tofu-head, and that Christianity is a vegetarian religion:

"Eat anything that is sold in the meat market without asking questions for conscience's sake; for the earth is the Lord's, and all it contains." [1 Corinthians 10:25-26]

"One man's faith allows him to eat everything, but another man, whose faith is weak, eats only vegetables." [Romans 14:2]

"Now the Spirit speaketh expressly that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits and doctrines of devils, speaking lies in hypocrisy, having their conscience seared with a hot iron, forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from meats, which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving by those who believe and know the truth. For every creature of God is good, and nothing to be refused if it be received with thanksgiving." [1 Timothy 4:1-4]

Straight from the New Testament. Read 'em and weep, Bruce.

Source: http://www.consumerfreedom.com/headline_detail.cfm?HEADLINE_ID=1890