State Sen. Johnnie Crutchfield (D-Ardmore) expressed
this concept Friday during the Ardmore Chamber of Commerce legislative luncheon,
taking the observation a step further:
"In two years we're talking about a billion dollars
(being) gone that we had two years ago," blaming restrictive legislation enacted
before he was elected to the Senate. Specifically, he mentioned the proposition
prohibiting the Legislature from raising taxes without a three-fourths approval
of the House and Senate or a vote of the people. The proposition was adopted in
the early '90s.
"People do not perceive there's a problem (with state
financing)," Crutchfield said. Meanwhile, he and Rep. Greg Piatt (R-Ardmore)
touched on where cuts are going to be made, how much and problems raised in
funding nursing homes, child care and other social programs.
Crutchfield anticipates "a ground swell" from the
people when cuts take place. He feels people will "demand a special session to
enact tax measures" dealing with the money crunch.
On the broad issue, Piatt agrees there's no quick fix
-- "you never have enough money." He spoke also of changes that can be made,
citing his own move to move the teacher rehiring date from April 10 to May 15.
That move centers on the date a teacher contract for the following year must be
finally approved.
"We've got to find out how much we really need,"
Piatt added. He called for attention to prevention programs.
Brad Ballard chaired the report session at Ryan's
Steak House, introducing the legislators.
Opening with a review of the work week, Crutchfield
touched on Senate action on the water bill (aquifer), cockfighting and
reinstating the prison cap law.
The measure to protect and study aquifer water
sources had language problems, Crutchfield said. Corrections have been made.
Admittedly, cockfighting is a pro-con issue that goes
beyond SQ 687 passed by the people. Simply explained, the question going to a
state vote will center only on the penalty question, not a legal issue on
fighting chickens or possessing equipment. Crutchfield said the state question
was written in a way that offered no options on penalties.
"They (backers) wrote it the way they wanted and
that's the way it went to the people," he said. "A lot of people did not want it
(fighting or possession) to be a felony, but they had no choice. It was either
this or that."
Pointing to penalties more severe than those imposed
for burglary, second-degree manslaughter and child molestation, he called the
penalties "totally out of line." If adopted on the revised plan, the violation
would classify as a misdemeanor.
In discussing the cap law, Crutchfield said any talk
about prison system reform results in being branded soft on crime from political
opponents. Yet, failure to deal with problems that have doubled the prison
population in eight years "is gutting the state budget." Using the cap law would
affect non-violent offenders within 60 days of release.
Admittedly, the senator and Piatt disagreed on this
issue. Piatt said a study by the Kay County District Attorney determined that 75
percent of those convicted from his jurisdiction were violent offenders, but
were not identified as such because of the system. Piatt said multiple count
charges usually identifies the prisoner according to the first entry. If that
entry is non-violent another such as aggravated rape may be overlooked.
Piatt also observed that Oklahoma's prison count
includes private prisons and not all those incarcerated are Oklahomans.
With questions from the audience, including a Task
Force on Child Abuse Prevention, Piatt took the opportunity to correct an
incorrect report released Thursday naming him as one of three House members
opposing HB 1017 for Oklahoma Health Care Authority funding. The report by Rep.
M.C. Leist (D-Morris) identified Piatt as one of three Republicans voting
against the measure. Piatt voted for the bill. The erroneous report was
corrected Thursday night.
Friday's session ended on an education issue that
prompted Crutchfield, a former classroom teacher, to explain that everything not
in the classroom is administration. This includes custodial, bus drivers,
non-certified positions.
"Right now the law allows school boards to share an
administrator," he added.
Saying the state "must eventually" look at school
administration and consolidation, Piatt said greater efficiency is needed to put
more money in the classroom.
The meeting concluded on a comment that untaxed
Internet purchases "are killing our communities." Legislation is pending to
change that.
Wilbert Wiggs may be contacted at wwiggs@ardmoreite.com, or by calling (580)
221-6526 Source: http://ardmoreite.com/stories/031603/loc_crunch.shtml
MIAMI - It is easy to get confused about ephedra amid all this media hysteria that makes dopes like Greg Cote suddenly think they know more than world-renowned physicians, but this is not a sports story.
It is a science story.
It is very easy to blame baseball, Bud Selig and the major-league players' union for not banning ephedra, but your blame is misplaced on these easy targets.
Blame the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Blame our government. Blame ephedra manufacturers getting rich off this perfectly legal product. Selig has enough trouble with smaller issues, like how to decide an All-Star tie. Now you want him to be a trailblazer on a scientific issue confounding some of America's brightest?
You can't blame Selig or union head Donald Fehr for lacking leadership on the ephedra issue when America's top doctors and scientists keep making it perfectly legal for your 16-year-old son to walk into just about any vitamin store in the United States and buy as much as he likes.
Football is viewed as enlightened on this subject, but it isn't. In a public-relations move, football knee-jerked and banned ephedra after Korey Stringer died. Football is essentially the systematic destruction of the human body for our entertainment. It is cockfighting with fewer feathers and more bad referees. It is an insanely violent game whose participants die early and are sometimes paralyzed. But football is enlightened because it bans a pill or powder that might or might not have killed one player in more than a decade of stimulant use?
There is hysteria in the air because of the awful death of Baltimore Orioles pitcher Steve Bechler, but it needs to be noted that basketball hasn't banned ephedra, either, and there isn't a public push to ban it there even though basketball players get their heart rates consistently up to far more dangerous levels than baseball players ever do.
Don't we need to find out just a little more about Bechler's death before knee-jerking and demanding that Selig ban a legal product? Isn't it possible, just possible, that Bechler's troubling medical history had more to do with his death than this suddenly unpopular product? Major League Baseball players have been using stimulants for decades, and this is the first time one has died. Although the Broward medical examiner called ephedra `a significant factor' in Bechler's death, might there be another more significant factor? Especially because ephedra is something that can be found in common cold medicines - cold medicines that housewives can take but football players now can't.
Source: http://www.thestate.com/mld/thestate/sports/baseball/5407031.htm+