Are There Violent Eco-Terrorists Embedded In Mainstream Tax-Free Animal Rights Organizations?

WHEN the Iraqi government showed the world photos of dead U.S. soldiers shot, execution-style, through their foreheads, President Bush announced that Iraqis who shoot prisoners will be prosecuted as war criminals.
Shooting defenseless prisoners violates a key rule of today's human societies. Saddam's Fedayeen thugs would no doubt retort that the United States is so much bigger and more powerful than Iraq that they have to strike any way they can.
That's also the argument of First World eco-terrorists who have burned public buildings, destroyed medical research laboratories and even murdered leading Dutch political candidate Pim Fortuyn last year.
Their justification is that they have no way but violence to make society stop doing what eco-terrorists don't like. This is an argument we wouldn't accept from Saddam Hussein, but it seems to protect the eco-terrorists from serious prosecution in America.
Most of the world's people prefer democracies instead of dictatorships. In a democracy everybody gets to help choose, instead of just a thuggish minority willing to burn and murder to get its way. Since most people are unwilling to commit arson and murder, in a world without rules the thugs win.
The spokesman for U.S. eco-violence is Craig Rosebraugh, who admittedly fronts for the Earth Liberation Front (ELF). Rosebraugh says the horror of seeing the forest behind his boyhood Oregon home cleared for affluent home sites made him admire violence. He thinks the U.S. tanks went into Kuwait in 1991 to get oil, not to reverse Saddam Hussein's invasion of a neighboring country. But he has no answer for this question: "If we went for the oil, why didn't we keep it?'
Rosebraugh claims corporations are committing wholesale murder. But the evidence shows Fascist, Communist and Baath Party dictatorships have murdered more than 100 million of their own citizens. Human Rights Watch credits Saddam with 250,000 deaths.
If Rosebraugh was a resident of Baghdad, he'd have seen his Ultimate Leader sell the country's oil to line his own pockets and then deliberately torch Kuwait's oil wells to cause an environmental disaster when the Allies threw him out.
Rosebraugh says corporate greed has set the stage for the "threatening shortage of natural resources and the massive environmental pollution and destruction present today in the United States.' He seems not to understand that the First World's forests are expanding, its farms are feeding more people from less land, and its air and water quality are rapidly improving.
It's the Third World where millions of domestic animals are starved and beaten by their poverty-ridden owners while endangered wild animals are hunted down for sale as "bushmeat.'
Rosebraugh says, "It is clear that the classic state-sanctioned means of social change are not working. It is time for a dramatic increase in underground direct action.'
Instead of nonviolent demonstrations, he recommends large- scale urban riots, physically "knocking the national TV networks off the air,' personally attacking heads of government and big companies in their homes, and undermining support for the U.S. troops going in harm's way.
Most Americans would defend Rosebraugh's constitutional right to speak such views but the Constitution also denies him the right to inflict his views on the rest of us through violence.
It's time the FBI tracked down law-breaking members of eco- terrorist groups and allowed them to contemplate their anti- democratic values from federal prison cells.
-- Dennis T. Avery is a senior fellow at The Hudson Institute, www.hudsoninstitute.org Readers may write to him at Hudson/DC, 1015 18th Street NW, Suite 300, Washington, D.C. 20036.
Source: http://www.pasadenastarnews.com/Stories/0,1413,206~11851~1307601,00.html
RAINBOW – San Diego Humane Society
investigators have arrested a man here on charges of possessing 64 fighting
gamecocks and materials used in cockfighting.
Joseph Bamoa, 50, was arrested Thursday at a ranch on Rainbow
Creek Road.
The charges are misdemeanors. Bamoa was released pending a court
date. He could not be reached yesterday for comment.
Authorities said they confiscated a large quantity of
cockfighting paraphernalia, including razor-sharp "slashers" and gaffs, which
are ice pick-like devices attached to birds' legs.
Humane Society law enforcement chief Capt. Beau Beauregard said
investigators are following leads that may result in additional arrests.
"Cockfighting is a heinous, barbaric activity," he said. "We are
putting cockfighters, dog fighters, and other animal abusers in San Diego County
on notice."
In cockfighting, birds are placed in a pit to fight to the
death. Even the victor can suffer serious injuries such as punctured lungs,
broken limbs and pierced eyes.
Aficionados bet amounts from $50 to several thousand dollars on
cockfights, which are illegal in 48 states. Louisiana and New Mexico are the
only states that allow cockfighting.
Officials said they euthanized two dozen birds at the Rainbow
residence that Bamoa admitted he owned.
"Unfortunately, there's nothing else that you can do with them,"
said society spokesman Gigi Bacon Theberge.
She said fighting cocks are usually so drugged, distressed,
diseased and violent that they can't be placed with other flocks.
The other birds remain at the Rainbow property because of
concerns about Newcastle disease until their owners attempt to claim them. The
birds will probably be euthanized after a required 13-day waiting period.
"It's a sad situation all around," Theberge said.
'Hunter Girl' ought to shoot with a camera
ONE BLEAK MORNING recently, I picked up The Free Lance-Star and read of the female child who is being taught to hunt in Caroline County ["Hunter Girl," Feb. 23]. It takes quite a bit to turn this old reporter's stomach, but this story made me ill. The sight of a pretty little girl in military-style camouflage, high-powered rifle in tow, chilled me to my bones. For a horrible moment, I thought another child "sniper" had been apprehended.
Instead, this was an incredible two-page spread on "Hunter Girl" and her prize kill--a tiny, pitiful doe that appeared to be about the size of a dog. I find this "sport" impossible to understand.
What "sport" is there in tracking and killing a small, terrified wild animal with dogs and radios and guns? It is a grim and sickening "sport." It is just as disgusting to many as the "sport" of cockfighting. It is a "sport" that has no more place in modern life than a medieval jousting match.
Someday soon, of course, the sheer pressure of encroaching human settlement will end hunting, even in those parts of Virginia that presently still allow it. Will this happen while a few wild creatures remain alive? I predict a dead heat, so to speak, but only time will tell. Future generations of children may never see a deer in the "wild."
Those of us who try to protect our land and its wild inhabitants have encountered hunters who absolutely cannot believe that certain property is off-limits to them. No legal shot has been fired in this part of Stafford County for years, except by the good folks of our law-enforcement department. Yet any walk in the woods around our old family homestead will turn up plenty of evidence of the sneaky blackguards who believe that the law applies only to the other fellow.
Oh, yes, indeed this woodland has been "posted"--so many times I've lost count. These vandals start campfires with the posted signs, then loll about and kill a few beer cans with buckshot. These are not neighbors whose "mamas raised 'em right."
Is an armed guard on one's country property the solution? Yes and no. It's one solution, but why should it be necessary in a decent society?
A Sunday walk with a friend, back before the recent snows, revealed an amazing scene in a back corner of our woods. Mighty hunters had nailed a ladder in a three-pronged oak tree and cleared a "field of fire" around their platform--aimed in the direction of the adjoining subdivision and only yards from the nearest homes. If anyone can tell me a tale of greater stupidity than this, I will eat my hat. One thing is for sure--if I lived down that way, I would not rest easy.
An open field, posted or not, is an invitation to people who have never been taught better, and the illegal hunter will go anywhere he chooses. Back in the fall, another friend caught a band of bow-hunters in our woods. This reprehensible "sport" has never been permitted on our property, and the friend told them so. One of them pointed out that our friend was not the owner of the property. "That's right," the friend replied, "and you'd better be glad the owner didn't catch you."
We often wonder what these hunter-vandals would do if the tables were turned and we chose to pursue our own hobbies on their property--set up our bird-watching scope on their front lawn, perhaps, or spread our picnic on their deck, or pitch our tent in their back yard. You can bet we'd be hauled off to the loony bin. Or maybe they'd just shoot us.
On a recent icy dawn, I stepped outside and heard a note or two of a once familiar birdsong. Could it be a lark, neither seen nor heard in these parts in many a year? I looked hopefully for the singer but spotted only that avian mimic, a passing starling. In quieter, rural days in Garrisonville, there were many larks that sang in the fields. There were bobwhites and whippoorwills, too. Their voices are long silent, the singers departed.
Unless our children learn to value these creatures, they will all be gone someday. The deer is no more immune to extinction than the passenger pigeon whose flocks once darkened the skies, or the bison that moved over the plains in herds of unimaginable size.
"Hunter Girl" ought to try heading for the woods with a camera, instead of a murderous rifle. Perhaps she can return with photographs of living animals. I want to see no more pictures of sad carcasses in your pages.
ANN GALLAHAN RHODES is a local conservationist.
Date published: 4/13/2003
Source: http://www.freelancestar.com/News/FLS/2003/042003/04132003/898983
Probe into Kelantan fire chief’s assault
KOTA BARU: Police have started investigating the case of state Fire and Rescue Services Department director Zamri Ibrahim, who was allegedly assaulted by several people at an Umno meeting in a restaurant near the department’s office here on Wednesday.
State police chief Senior Assistant Comm of Police 1 Datuk Mohd Najib Abdul Aziz said the state Deputy Public Prosecutor had issued an order to the police to investigate the case.
“Police have recorded statements from several witnesses present at the gathering,” he said after closing the 33rd Police Cadet Corps celebration at Pengkalan Chepa yesterday.
He said the police were investigating the case under Section 323 of the Penal Code for causing injury to another person and Section 27A of the Police Act for holding a public gathering without a valid police permit.
SAC 1 Najib said the police were also investigating the case of a police inspector alleged to have threatened two men with a pistol in Rantau Panjang on Friday.
The officer, who led a police team in an operation, had detained the duo in a lorry laden with 13,000kg of rice believed to have been smuggled from a neighbouring country.
“After detaining the suspects, aged 37 and 47, they were brought to the Pasir Mas police station for their statements to be recorded.
“However, the duo lodged a police report against the inspector alleging he had threatened them with a pistol,” said SAC 1 Najib.
Kelantan CID chief Assistant Comm of Police Abdul Rahim Jani said police arrested 31 people including a woman suspected of engaging in illegal cockfighting at Pasir Puteh on Thursday.
He said the suspects, aged between 17 and 45, were arrested after a 60-men police team surrounded the area.
ACP Abdul Rahim said they seized RM14,000 in cash and seven cocks.
He said the suspects would be charged in court under Section 44 (1) of the Animal Ordinance.
Source: http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2003/4/13/nation/ktbcock&sec=nation