Cockfighting Bill Passes Out of House Committee
Tuesday February 11, 2003 9:21pm
Oklahoma City (AP) - Legislation that calls for a vote of the people to decide whether to make cockfighting a misdemeanor instead of a felony was approved by a legislative committee today.

The measure by Representative Randall Erwin would reduce the penalty for those who engage in the blood sport, which was outlawed when voters passed State Question 687 in the November fifth general election.

Passage of the statewide referendum made it a felony, punishable by up to ten years in prison, to conduct cockfights, keep equipment or facilities for cockfighting or possess the birds.

Erwin says the penalties are too severe and most voters in his southeastern Oklahoma district opposed the statewide ban.

The bill will now go before the House for action.
Source: http://www.ktul.com/news/stories/0203/73852.html
 

 
----- Original Message -----
From: "ProMED-mail" <promed@promed.isid.harvard.edu>
Subject: PRO/AH> Newcastle disease, game fowl, plty. - USA (CA) (08)
 
NEWCASTLE DISEASE, GAME FOWL, POULTRY - USA (CA) (08)
*****************************************************
A ProMED-mail post
<
http://www.promedmail.org>
ProMED-mail, a program of the
International Society for Infectious Diseases
<
http://www.isid.org>

Date: 11 Feb 2003
From: James Alexander <
James.Alexander@tdh.state.tx.us>

[From ProMED-mail posting "Newcastle disease, game fowl, plty. - USA
(CA) (07) 20030210.0361:]

"Dr. Allen's letter highlights the need for other measures, such as
education of the animal owners, or perhaps trainers and fighters."

and

"Education initiatives that target non-commercial animal owners
represent a significant need nationwide. This is especially important
in  the context of bioterrorism, agricultural security, and emergency
preparedness (Agricultural Security and Emergency Preparedness)"


The above statements reminded me of an incident during an effort to
eradicate Infectious Laryngotracheitis (ILT) from Texas in the
mid-1980s while I was with the Texas Animal Health Commission (TAHC).
A game bird owner/fighter sent some birds to the poultry lab due to
illness and death.  When ILT was diagnosed, TAHC destroyed the
remaining birds, eliminating the man's line of game bird genetics and
an important source of income.  The gist of his final comment was
that he would never make the same mistake again.

Prior to this incident, some commercial egg and broiler producers in
that part of the state were experiencing sporadic outbreaks of ILT,
apparently due to a modified live vaccine strain of the virus.  It is
possible that some of the workers from these farms attended
cockfights and may have even raised the birds.  In addition,
biosecurity was lax.  The potential for the disease to spread from
the commercial flocks to the fighting birds and then to other
commercial farms was great.

Education is important and will most likely increase the odds of a
disease incident being reported by some producers with small
herds/flocks.  However, I believe, based on this and other
experiences, that certain segments of the population, especially
those engaged in an industry that is dependent on an illegal
activity, such as cockfighting, will not comply with disease
reporting because the people do not perceive it to be in their
self-interest.  Only when it enters the commercial portion of a given
industry will the disease be detected by the regulatory agencies.

Because of this, biosecurity and disease surveillance are indispensable.

This is a personal observation, not to be construed as the view of
the Texas Department of Health.

--
James L. Alexander, DVM, MPVM., Dipl. ACVPM
Regional Zoonosis Control Veterinarian
Texas Department of Health
Public Health Region 1
Canyon, TX  79016-0968
<
james.alexander@tdh.state.tx.us>

[Biosecurity is an issue in all animal operations. As much as we want
to protect our animal industry and economy associated with that
industry, it is important to be sensitive as much as possible to the
owner. Therefore, education is the key to communication for
surveillance, control, and biosecurity. - Mod.TG]

[see also:
Newcastle disease, game fowl, plty. - USA (CA) (07) 20030210.0361
Newcastle disease, game birds, poultry - USA (CA) (06) 20030209.0353
Newcastle disease, game birds - USA (AZ): OIE      20030208.0337
Newcastle disease, game fowl, plty. - USA (west)      20030206.0318
Newcastle disease, game fowl, plty. - USA (CA,NV) (02) 20030204.0304
Newcastle disease, poultry - USA (AZ): suspected      20030202.0289
Newcastle disease, game fowl, poultry - USA: control      20030129.0260
Newcastle disease, U.S. poultry ban extended - Mexico      20030127.0247
Newcastle disease, game fowl, poultry - USA (CA, NV)      20030127.0246
Newcastle disease, game birds - USA (NV) (02) 20030126.0237
Newcastle disease, game birds, poultry - USA (CA) (05) 20030117.0145
Newcastle disease, game birds - USA (NV)      20030117.0138
Newcastle disease, game birds, poultry - USA (CA)      20030103.0014
2002
----
Newcastle disease, game birds, poultry - USA (CA)      20021228.6147
Newcastle disease, game birds - USA (CA) (11) 20021221.6104
Newcastle disease, game birds - USA (CA) (02) 20021012.5533
Newcastle disease, game birds - USA (TX): warning      20021006.5482
Newcastle disease, game birds - USA (CA): OIE      20021004.5468]
..........................tg/pg/lm
*##########################################################*
ProMED-mail makes every effort to  verify  the reports  that
are  posted,  but  the  accuracy  and  completeness  of  the
information,   and  of  any  statements  or  opinions  based
thereon, are not guaranteed. The reader assumes all risks in
using information posted or archived by  ProMED-mail.   ISID
and  its  associated  service  providers  shall not be  held
responsible for errors or omissions or  held liable for  any
damages incurred as a result of use or reliance upon  posted
or archived material.
************************************************************
Visit ProMED-mail's web site at <
http://www.promedmail.org>.
Send  all  items  for   posting  to:  
promed@promedmail.org
(NOT to  an  individual moderator).  If you do not give your
full name and  affiliation, it  may  not  be  posted.   Send
commands  to  subscribe/unsubscribe,   get  archives,  help,
etc. to:
majordomo@promedmail.org.    For assistance  from a
human  being  send mail to: 
owner-majordomo@promedmail.org.
############################################################
############################################################

 

 
..........I would welcome any comments on any of these or similar activities, either pro or con...........
 
  COLUMN: Cockfights heartless torture
by Richard "Bugman" Fagerlund

Daily Lobo Columnist


Cockfighting in New Mexico is alive and well.

Cockfighting died in committee so we are stuck with this so-called sport for another year at least unless a miracle happens. Five members of the senate committee decided that animal cruelty in New Mexico is alive and well and we should continue it because it is a "tradition." I am surprised that one of these five so-called "representatives of the people" didn't introduce a bill to legalize dog fighting. Then we could have two species to torture in the name of "tradition." Maybe we can bring bullfighting to the State Fair this year.

If you aren't familiar with cockfighting, two roosters are fitted with three-inch long ice pick-like knives or hooked gaffs. They are put into a pit where they will fight until one or both of them are severely injured or dead. The gaffs inflict deep puncture wounds, eyes are gouged out and legs and wings are often broken. The birds are drugged before the match with stimulants such as strychnine or methamphetamines so they can fight without feeling the pain they are in. If they falter during the fight, the handlers pick them up and blow in their faces to revive them.

According to an investigator for The Humane Society of the United States, "Even if one bird is half dead, the handlers don't stop the fight. The bird may be bleeding, stunned, and wounded, but he will be kept fighting, even if he can only lie there in fear and terror while the other bird keeps attacking him."

The match isn't over until one bird is unable to continue, even with prodding, or is dead. Survivors whose eyes are gouged out, or are slashed or blinded are pitted together in "blinker derbies," where they are forced to continue to fight until only one bird is barely still alive. All the time the spectators are betting on the outcome. At the end of the night, all the losing birds are thrown on a "dead" pile, even though some of them aren't quite dead. One person told me of a handler stomping his rooster to death because he lost the fight (and apparently some of his handler's money).

When I wrote a column about this subject several weeks ago in the Albuquerque Journal, I heard from a number of cockfighters. One told me he didn't like dog fights because they were cruel. When I asked him the difference, he said that dogs were animals, but roosters were just chickens. Apparently, chickens don't feel any pain. Another fellow wrote and told me that they invented chickens a couple of thousand years ago so they could fight. So much for the theory of evolution. And one fellow told me that George Washington was a cockfighter because he attended a cockfight. I went to a football game once, but I guarantee you that I am not a quarterback.

Finally, another fellow told me they put knives and gaffs on the roosters because it is more humane. He said that if they fight with their natural spurs they could get an infection. He was serious.

There is the contention that cockfighting is conducive to gambling and drug use. I am not of the illusion that eliminating cockfighting will eliminate drug use or gambling. If we eliminate all activities where drugs are used or illegal gambling takes place, there wouldn't be anything to do. Football, baseball, basketball, boxing and almost all other sports have their share of gambling and drug use. My focus on eliminating cockfighting is based solely on the cruelty to the birds.

Almost all of the reasons I heard for keeping cockfighting legal are as completely and totally vacuous as the ones I mentioned. Apparently Manny Aragon and his cohorts in the senate committee bought that nonsense. So much for representing the 81 percent of the people who abhor this activity.

Only in New Mexico (and Louisiana) can animal cruelty and sport be synonymous.

I am working on a book about cockfighting, dog fighting, fox hunting, clubbing baby seals, rattlesnake roundups and some of our other so-called sports and activities. I will be writing about some of these other fun things people do to animals in future columns. I would welcome any comments on any of these or similar activities, either pro or con.



Richard Fagerlund can be reached at fagerlun@unm.edu.
 
Source: http://www.dailylobo.com/news/367308.html


Jones the 'Hunter' in Heavyweight Debut


ASSOCIATED PRESS

PENSACOLA, Fla. (AP) - Mounted on the walls of the game room at boxer Roy Jones' 80-acre ranch are an eight-foot alligator caught in a pond behind his house, a deer, a large bass and a wild boar.

The trophies make Jones think of his upcoming heavyweight debut against John Ruiz.

"I'm the hunter," Jones said Wednesday. "I'm coming to get him. My life may be on the line. I have to kill or be killed."

Ruiz enjoys a 35-pound weight advantage and went a total of 36 rounds with Evander Holyfield in three fights, winning one, losing one and earning a draw in the other. So Jones considers himself an underdog, even though oddsmakers regard the light heavyweight champion as the favorite in the March 1 fight in Las Vegas.

"People want to see this big guy pounding on me," Jones said. "They want to know can I take it. They say, 'We haven't seen you take a real punch.'

"He might knock me down 100 times, but I'll get up 101 times."

Jones, who said he weighs less than 190 pounds, is trying to join Michael Spinks as the only reigning light heavyweight champions to win the heavyweight title. He also hopes to become the first former middleweight champion to earn the heavyweight crown since the 1890s.

"Everybody wants to do what hasn't been done," Jones said. "That's what life's about. That's what sports is all about. That's why I'm doing it."

The Ruiz bout is motivating Jones to rededicate himself to his training. He gets up at 5 a.m. each day to run instead of playing pickup basketball games late at night. He's working out in New Orleans, yet said he doesn't even know where Bourbon Street is.

Jones regards making the U.S. Olympic boxing team in 1988 as his greatest achievement. He said he doesn't want to dwell on how much beating Ruiz would mean to him.

"I'm not thinking about that, or I might pass out before I do it," he said as his cockfighting roosters crowed in the background.

Jones said he hopes the bout will silence critics who contend he has avoided tough fights and can't take a punch.

"If I get a 12-round decision, that's not spectacular," Jones said. "But if I knock him out..."

Jones, accustomed to fighting in a 175-pound division, has called his move up to heavyweight a one-shot deal. But on Wednesday he declined to rule out anything beyond the bout with Ruiz.

"I wake up just thinking about getting into a fight," he said. "That's how much I like fighting. There's something about me. I don't like to leave any stone unturned."

Might that include a fight against 6-foot-5, 250-pound Lennox Lewis?

"He's got no stones in my neighborhood," Jones said, laughing. "I ain't crazy. But I'll not say, 'I will not do it.'"

--

Source: http://www.lasvegassun.com/sunbin/stories/boxing/2003/feb/12/021208500.html