Don't try to vaccinate against END

----- Original Message -----
Subject: Question: How does vaccinating your bird kill them?
A vaccine has not been developed for Exotic Newcastle Disease (END).  There are a number of strains of Newcastle disease, END is the most deadly.  The disease is not native to the United States, being introduced to California in late 2002.  You may hear of people using vaccines to prevent Newcastle disease.  These vaccines are only effective at preventing the less deadly strains of Newcastle disease.  Commercial poultry farms often vaccinate their birds to protect them from dying from the less powerful strains of Newcastle disease, not END.

 
Let’s say that you go ahead and vaccinate your birds against Newcastle Disease.  Your birds can still get infected and die if they get exposed to the END virus.  However, they may shed less END virus before they die.  An infected, vaccinated bird may appear fine until it gets stressed; like from fighting, running from predators or bad weather.  In the mean time, it has infected many other birds with the END virus.  The best way to protect your birds is to avoid contact with other birds until exotic Newcastle disease is eradicated.
 
Please contact me if you have any questions.  We need your help.
 
Tom Biebighauser
Information Officer
Exotic Newcastle Disease Task Force



 

While The HSUS Touts "Organized Criminal Network " And PETA Touts "'Got Beer?"

How Many Tax Dollars, Legal Livelihoods And Innocent Lives Will The AR Cause To Be Spent To Promote Their Political And Religious Agenda?

 

'Got Beer?' State Urged To Adopt Official Drink

Animal Rights Group Makes Suggestion

Forget about "Got Milk?"

How about "Got Beer?"
 
An animal rights group wants Wisconsin Gov. Jim Doyle to change the state's official beverage from milk to beer. 
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals says milk is harmful to humans -- and is really meant for calves.

The group says beer is healthier for humans than cow's milk.

PETA first came up with the beer-for-milk campaign two years ago. It ended the push after being criticized by Mothers Against Drunk Driving and other groups. But PETA restarted the campaign last year.
 
Source: http://www.nbc5i.com/news/2004662/detail.html
 

.......Larry Cooper, a state Department of Food and Agriculture spokesman, said last week that about 35 percent of the backyard birds euthanized during the outbreak thus far have been fighting birds.........

 
Victory over poultry killer proves elusive
 
Virus has infected 5 ranches in county

By Elizabeth Fitzsimons
UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER

February 26, 2003

Six months ago, when a fatal avian disease was discovered in fighting cocks in Compton in Los Angeles County, state and federal officials began an aggressive campaign to stop what was thought to be an isolated outbreak.

Infected birds – and any possibly exposed to the virus – would be quickly destroyed and buried in landfills.

But cases kept appearing, some of them hundreds of miles apart. So far, 3 million birds have been ordered destroyed at 17 chicken ranches in Southern California, Arizona and Nevada in an effort that has cost more than $35 million.

Containment of exotic Newcastle disease, ominously known as END, seems no closer now than it did six months ago, with announcements of newly infected poultry ranches at times coming one day after another. Despite intensive protection efforts, the virus has infected five of 38 commercial poultry ranches in San Diego County – four in Valley Center and one in Ramona.

The spread of the disease, which is harmless to humans, has some grasping for explanations. Was the outbreak far more widespread than initially suspected? Or could exotic Newcastle be spreading by some elusive means, such as by illegal cockfighting or by wild birds?

Leticia Rico, a spokeswoman for the state Department of Food and Agriculture, suspects the disease had a foothold before it was discovered.

"The disease has been out there. I don't know for how long," Rico said. "The more we looked, the more we found."

Some residents in San Bernardino County have told officials they saw birds dying weeks before exotic Newcastle was detected there. So far, nothing seems to have worked in stopping it.

A case of exotic Newcastle is found about once a year in San Diego County, typically in birds smuggled in from other countries as pets. It had not infected commercial flocks in California for 30 years.

After early finds among backyard birds in October 2002, task force members went door to door in Riverside and San Bernardino counties seeking new cases.

Commercial egg ranches across Southern California locked down their properties, barring all but necessary visitors and practicing careful bio-security measures. They urged their employees not to attend cockfights, or even to visit homes where birds were kept. They sprayed trucks and visitors' shoes with disinfectant.

August Fluegge Jr., who with his father owns ranches in Escondido and Valley Center, divided his egg-processing facility into three areas: dirty, common and clean. Each area has its own color.

The dirty area, marked with black paint, is where racks of unprocessed eggs are assembled. If the racks must be rolled through the common area, painted orange, that area is disinfected. But the racks can never come into the clean area, which is painted white.

Despite the Fluegges' elaborate measures to protect their two operations, their Valley Center ranch of about 55,000 birds tested positive last week for exotic Newcastle. Fluegge declined to discuss any outbreak at his ranch, but agreed to talk about protective measures.

The spread of the disease, despite ranchers' best efforts to safeguard themselves, has some thinking that, ultimately, only so much can be done.

"If I go out of business it's not like I'm going to die," said Joe Cebe, owner of Ramona-based Cebe Farms, which breeds and hatches chickens to be sold live at markets in Los Angeles. "I lie awake at night thinking about it. But what can I do? If that disease is going to get me, it's going to get me."

The failure to contain the virus has Cebe and other ranchers asking a lot more questions of visitors about where they've been – from utility workers to catering-company employees. Cebe compares a truck that has visited an infected ranch to sharing a toothbrush with someone who is sick.

But sharing is hard to avoid. "It's a close industry," said Kerry Mahoney, the county veterinarian. "There's a lot of crossover, and crossover of ownership in different properties."

Eric Larson, executive director of the San Diego County Farm Bureau, said shared practices among commercial poultry ranches have been a problem.

"Equipment moves back and forth between farms, feed trucks move back and forth between farms, inspectors move back and forth between farms," Larson said.

"A grower can control vehicles and can control equipment, but if they're going to be successful, they're going to have a large number of workers come onto their farms everyday and that's an element they can't control."

Some believe the initial spread of exotic Newcastle might have been aided by cockfighting, an illegal sport involving thousands of people across the state.

Cockfighters aren't likely to report diseased or dead birds to their county agriculture department, so exotic Newcastle can spread undetected in that underground community.

"They don't raise these birds to stay on their little parcel. They fight the birds in an organized fight circuit, and they sell birds to other cockfighting enthusiasts," said Wayne Pacelle, a senior vice president with the Humane Society of the United States, which has asked for a federal crackdown on the sport.

"This is an organized criminal network of people who are violating state and federal law. At the major derbies you can see people from a dozen or more states."

Larry Cooper, a state Department of Food and Agriculture spokesman, said last week that about 35 percent of the backyard birds euthanized during the outbreak thus far have been fighting birds.

Task force officials have downplayed the role of wild birds, which are not usually carriers of exotic Newcastle. But some ranchers have become concerned about wild birds feeding on partially digested feed found in manure piles at chicken ranches.

"The disease is live in the manure," said Rico of the Department of Food and Agriculture. "It is a risk. That is why when we find infected facilities we do remove the manure as well as the top layer of the soil."

With the outbreak still uncontrolled, the Zoological Society of San Diego has implemented heightened bio-security measures at both the San Diego Zoo and the San Diego Wild Animal Park, spokeswoman Christina Simmons said.

"The reports we're hearing is that the outbreak is getting more widespread in San Diego County, and as it does it becomes more of a concern," she said.

Vendors, suppliers, the media and others doing business at the zoo have been asked not to use the same vehicles that may have visited poultry facilities, particularly those in Valley Center and Ramona.

The tires of their vehicles are now sprayed with a disinfectant solution when they enter the zoo or animal park, and so are those of any other vehicles that go beyond the public parking areas. This does not apply to the general public.

There have been no discussions about restricting public access to the zoo and park, Simmons said. The only measures taken so far were closing the walk-through aviaries at both facilities to the public in early January.

This latest outbreak of exotic Newcastle disease in commercial chicken flocks has not yet reached the level of the last outbreak, in the early 1970s, when 12 million birds were destroyed and $56 million spent before the virus was eradicated. It took three years to stop that outbreak.

Staff writer James Steinberg contributed to this report.

Elizabeth Fitzsimons:
(760) 752-6743; elizabeth.fitzsimons@uniontrib.com

Source: http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/metro/20030226-9999_6m26new.html


 
Poultry outbreak toll hits 3 million




The death tally reached 3 million Tuesday in Southern California, where the poultry industry continues to be ravaged by exotic Newcastle disease.

The Exotic Newcastle Disease Task Force said Tuesday that the virus has infected a flock of 55,000 chickens in San Diego County. It's the fifth commercial flock in the county and the 17th in Southern California to be infected.

Like the others before them, the infected birds will be destroyed, their bodies double-bagged and the remains buried.

All eight Southern California counties are under quarantine, forbidding the movement of live birds or poultry products out of the zone without a permit certifying they are free of the disease.

Regions of Nevada and Arizona, where the disease has been discovered in backyard flocks, are under a similar quarantine.

Newcastle does not affect humans, the U.S. Department of Agriculture said, nor does it damage meat or eggs. The exotic strain, however, is fatal to birds.

The disease has not been found in the Central Valley, where Livingston-based Foster Poultry Farms raises many of its birds. Foster Poultry Farms accounts for more than 90 percent of the state's chicken production and is the No. 7 processor in the country, according to industry production figures.

California's poultry industry is worth $3.2 billion annually, according to the Modesto-based California Poultry Federation.

The task force last week announced a program to monitor the valley, Sierra foothills and North Coast for the disease. The program will be based in Modesto and will go door to door, with teams asking about birds and providing information about the disease. The surveys will start in March.

On a related note, Napa County sheriff's deputies raided an alleged cockfighting operation, according to the California Farm Bureau Federation. They confiscated more than 1,000 roosters, as well as fighting equipment.

Government and industry officials are worried that cockfighting -- illegal in California and 47 other states -- could be spreading Newcastle in Southern California and could eventually bring it to the Central Valley.

A statewide outbreak of the disease in the 1970s led officials to destroy nearly 12 million chickens. That outbreak cost $56 million to stop and it was found that illegal cockfighting played a role in the spread of the disease.

The federal government has spent $22 million and the state $13 million battling the latest outbreak, according to the state.

Bee staff writer Richard T. Estrada can be reached at 578-2316 restrada@modbee.com.

Source: http://www.modbee.com/ag/story/6271054p-7216454c.html

 


Oklahoma.........
 
 
House Passes Bill To Reduce Cockfighting Penalty
Tuesday February 25, 2003 6:16pm
 
Oklahoma City (AP) - The state House passed a bill today that would let voters decide whether cockfighting should be a misdemeanor.

The measure would amend a statewide referendum passed by voters in November that made cockfighting a felony.

Opponents of the bill say a lesser punishment would make the cockfighting ban unenforceable.

The bill now goes to the Senate for consideration.

A Senate committee last week approved a similar measure that would reduce the cockfighting penalty to a misdemeanor.

The Senate bill doesn't call for a vote of the people.

Copyright 2003 by The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
 
Source: http://www.ktul.com/news/stories/0203/76040.html
 

California.......
 
 
Landowner denies knowledge of cock fights
More than 1,500 roosters seized in raid Saturday
Tuesday, February 25, 2003

By ROSEANN KEEGAN
Register Staff Writer

Officers seized 1,546 roosters, fighting paraphernalia and made 15 arrests during a two-day bust of an alleged cockfighting operation last weekend, but the property's owner claims he never saw anything illegal at his Foster Road poultry ranch.

Property owner Stephen Camden, a Vallejo attorney, said he's toured the property on at least three occasions -- most recently on Feb. 6 -- but never saw any signs of cockfighting, a direct violation of a provision Camden said he placed in the tenants' lease.

"Every time I was out there, it seems the animals were being very well taken care of," Camden said Monday.

Eight birds were dead when a state-county task force arrived Saturday afternoon, and 12 were later euthanized due to injuries sustained while fighting, according to Capt. Mike Loughran of the county sheriff's department. Several are being treated by local veterinarians.

Officers representing law enforcement agencies from Los Angeles to Galt waded through mud, rooster excrement, trash and dead rats and found the telltale signs of cockfighting: razor-sharp spurs known as "gaffs," steroids and medicines to treat the birds before and after the fights, and syringes to administer the drugs.

Members of the U.S. Department of Agriculture tested sickly birds for Newcastle disease, a deadly avian infection that struck the state's poultry industry in the 1970s and has resurfaced in Southern California. Results are still pending. Eric Sakach of the Humane Society said the disease is thought to have originated from similar cockfighting operations.

"The thing that blew me away when we went to serve these warrants," Loughran said, "was (that) there were kids there, little kids, ranging from (age) 2 to 7."

Thirteen of the individuals arrested were cited and released for charges including misdemeanor possession of fighting cocks and possession of fighting paraphernalia. Two men were taken into custody for the same reason, with the added charge of violating immigration laws. One of those men may be later charged with selling a fighting cock to undercover agents, Loughran said.

"There was one man upset that the country didn't provide information when they immigrated on what's legal and what's not legal," Loughran said.

From his law office in Vallejo, Camden said he was explicit with the tenants -- who rent one of 12 parcels on the land for $200 a month -- that cockfighting is grounds for eviction.

"I had heard there had been problems (with cockfighting) in American Canyon," Camden said.

Indeed, most of the tenants are transplants from a similar operation on the outskirts of American Canyon who were evicted when the property was said to be changing hands.

Camden said he has been on top of other problems plaguing 1895 Foster Road since he purchased it in November, including county building code violations for the height and width of poultry pens and the garage doors that fence the property.

Because of the tenants' noncompliance, Camden said he served eviction notices in December. But following the most recent tour of the property with a county official, Camden said the property was cleared of code violations so the evictions were not enforced.

Following the weekend raid, those arrested will now be ordered out.

"(The arrests) are clear evidence for me," Camden said. "That's enough to evict them. I just wish I had known earlier."

Camden is unsure of the future of the property, which is zoned for agriculture.

"I was hoping someday it would be a petting zoo open to the public for free, but it looks like they may have knocked that off the wall," Camden said.

Roseann Keegan can be reached at 256-2220 or rlanglois@napanews.com
Source: http://www.napanews.com/templates/index.cfm?template=story_full&id=13E6D570-C85D-47D9-BC5D-DDFAF931EE34
 
 

Mississippi.......
 

Cockfighting at barn leads to 29 arrests

  • Most of the 21 roosters found had to be destroyed

    By Thyrie Bland
    tbland@clarionledger.com

    Twenty-nine people are free on bond after being arrested over the weekend in Hinds County at a shed deputies say was being used for cockfighting.

    Hinds Sheriff's Department deputies, acting on a tip, raided a barn on Bill Downing Road about 2 p.m. Saturday, said Lt. Pete Luke of the Hinds County Sheriff's Department.

    "The cockfighting was in progress when we arrived on the scene," Luke said.

    Two roosters were already dead when deputies arrived, Luke said.

    Deputies also found hypodermic needles, steroids, B-12 vitamins and steel spurs, which are attached to the roosters' legs when they fight, at the barn, Luke said.

    The steroids and the vitamins were being used to make the animals stronger and more aggressive when they fought, Luke said.

    "It's very cruel and inhumane the way they were treating these animals," Luke said.

    "You don't think about it until you see the end result."

    The Sheriff's Department turned over 21 roosters to the Mississippi Animal Rescue League in Jackson.

    Of 21 roosters, 16 have been euthanized, and two more were scheduled to be put to sleep Tuesday, said Debra Boswell, executive director of the animal rescue league.

    "They are not friendly toward people," Boswell said.

    "They are agitated. They are not your average barnyard chicken."

    The rescue league will try to find homes for the remaining roosters, which are not as aggressive as the others, Boswell said.

  • Source: http://www.clarionledger.com/news/0302/26/m15.html


    Florida........
     
     
    Deputies bust sophisticated cockfighting ring
     
    NBC2 News
     
     
     COLLIER COUNTY, Feb. 26, 2003 — Collier deputies say they’ve shut down a large cockfighting operation, confiscating more than 500 roosters trained and groomed to fight. It’s the largest such bust in county history.

    The birds, allegedly owned by Victor Valdez, Jr., are now in the custody of Collier’s animal control.

    Authorities say it was a sophisticated ring. They say Valdez was selling drugs from his house on Lafayette Lane in Golden Gate Estates, and ran the cockfights on the side. They say the bloodsport is a big money maker.

    The roosters are worth so much money that they are under tight security at animal control. The babies will reportedly be sent to a farm, but the 434 grown roosters are a bigger problem – due to their training, they can’t be integrated with other animals.

    Valdez faces five drug charges, including cocaine trafficking and marijuana possession, and investigators say animal cruelty charges are pending.

    Source: http://www.nbc-2.com/News/stories/022603-cockfighting.shtml


    Hawaii.........

    Bill toughens law on animal cruelty

    By James Gonser
    Advertiser Staff Writer

    A bill to toughen the state's animal cruelty laws by allowing felony charges to be filed against anyone who intentionally kills a domesticated animal, or who is a repeat animal cruelty offender, was debated before a packed House Judiciary Committee at the State Capitol yesterday.

    Police, prosecutors and the Hawaiian Humane Society spoke in support of the bill while the public defender's office and the Animal Care Foundation testified in opposition.

    After hearing testimony, the committee voted to send House Bill 976 H.D. 2 to the House floor.

    Deputy Prosecutor Lori Nishimura said her office believes that animal killers and repeat offenders should be "treated more harshly and are deserving of an enhanced grade of offense."

    If the bill is passed, killing an animal would become a Class C felony punishable by up to five years in prison and a $10,000 fine. The misdemeanor charge under present law is punishable by up to one year in prison and a $2,000 fine.

    State public defender Jack Tonaki told the committee that the present cruelty-to-animals law provides sufficient punishment. He said a person charged with several counts could serve extended jail time.

    "The authorities currently have the ability to severely punish the perpetrator," he said in written testimony.

    Tonaki also said the bill should be limited to domesticated animals because hunters or scientists who use animals for experimentation could be prosecuted under the law.

    Pamela Burns, president of the Hawaiian Humane Society, requested that the bill also require counseling for animal abusers. She also asked that bill be amended to toughen the penalties for cockfighting, making it a felony rather an a misdemeanor.

    "While there has been debate about this form of cruelty and how it's a part of culture, let's make sure we see cockfighting clearly," Burns said. "Cockfighting is where people kill animals for sport, entertainment and monetary gain."

    Frank De Giacomo, vice president of the Animal Care Foundation, testified that the bill should not be passed because the laws are not enforced anyway and also because groups of animal rescuers could be targeted for unfair prosecution.

    The committee also approved House Bill 49 H.D. 2, which would restrict the use of cellular phones while driving, allowing hands-free devices only. Proponents say the bill would make driving safer but opponents say there is no conclusive proof that use of a cell phone causes accidents.

    Source: http://the.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/2003/Feb/26/ln/ln20a.html


     
     
    ...........when protesters do not "obtain" property, they cannot be punished under federal extortion laws..........
     
     
    Court rules for abortion protesters

    WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that federal racketeering and extortion laws were improperly used to punish aggressive anti-abortion protesters, lifting a nationwide injunction that barred people from interfering with clinic business.

    The court's 8-1 ruling applies to protests of all sorts, not just at abortion clinics.

    Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist, writing for the majority, said that when protesters do not "obtain" property, they cannot be punished under federal extortion laws.

    The court's ruling is a victory for Operation Rescue, anti-abortion leader Joseph Scheidler and others who were ordered to pay damages to abortion clinics and were barred from interfering with their businesses for 10 years. The ruling ends that injunction.

    Rehnquist said their protest activity did not qualify as extortion.

    That outcome had been sought by activists like actor Martin Sheen, animal rights groups and even some organizations that support abortion rights. They argued that protesters of all types could face harsher penalties for demonstrating, if the court ruled otherwise.

    The demonstrators had been sued in 1986 by abortion clinics in Delaware and Wisconsin and the National Organization for Women, which contended that racketeering and extortion laws should protect businesses from violent protests that drive away clients.

    They accused the groups of blocking clinic entrances, menacing doctors, patients and clinic staff, and destroying equipment during a 15-year campaign to limit abortions. The demonstrators were ordered to pay about $258,000 in damages.

    Rehnquist said there is no dispute that abortion protesters interfered with clinic operations and in some cases committed crimes.

    "But even when their acts of interference and disruption achieved their ultimate goal of 'shutting down' a clinic that performed abortions, such acts did not constitute extortion," he wrote.

    The punishments were meted out under provisions of the 1970 Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, known as RICO, and the Hobbs Act, a 1946 law aimed at crushing organized crime. The Hobbs Act makes it a crime to take property from another with force.

    Justice John Paul Stevens filed the only dissent. He said the court was limiting the scope of the Hobbs Act and limiting protection of property owners in its "murky opinion."

    The Supreme Court has previously said that the Hobbs Act should be read broadly, he said.

    "The principal beneficiaries of the court's dramatic retreat from the position that federal prosecutors and federal courts have maintained throughout the history of this important statute will certainly be the class of professional criminals whose conduct persuaded Congress that the public needed federal protection from extortion," Stevens wrote.

    Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote separately to say that the court was "rightly reluctant" to extend the reach of the RICO law, which allows prosecutors and private groups to seek hefty penalties.

    The issue dates back to the 1980s when large groups of anti-abortion demonstrators used aggressive tactics to disrupt clinics. In 1998, a jury in Illinois found demonstrators guilty of dozens of violations, including four acts involving physical violence or threats of violence.

    The court did not address a related issue in the case over whether the racketeering law gives individuals the right to ask a federal judge to stop a disputed activity. The law is most often used by federal prosecutors to go after organized crime figures, alleged conspirators and other criminals.

    The cases are Scheidler vs. National Organization for Women, 01-1118, and Operation Rescue vs. National Organization for Women, 01-1119.

    Copyright 2003 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.