.........You'd think that hunters could come up with enough money to counter the people who worship at the altar of animals.........
 
.........animal rights groups, such as the Humane Society of the United States.........
 

 
 
Future could be bleak for hunters
By Gene Mueller
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
 

     As concerns England supporting the United States in its desire to rid the world of Saddam Hussein, God bless England. However, that's the only blessing we'll hand England, because our cousins across the sea are doing all they can to outlaw hunting — all hunting, not just the horse-riding, fox-hunting variety. 
     A bill to also abolish all hare and deer hunting will receive a second reading in Parliament. The most recent vote was 368-155 in favor of taking a closer look at the bill. It means things do not look good for hunters over there.
     But why in the world would Americans want to copy the Brits in their anti-hunting activities?
     According to the Associated Press, Rep. Jim Moran, Virginia Democrat, says he intends to see the baiting of bears outlawed on all federal (hunting) lands although many state wildlife officials say it is needed to help keep bear numbers in check. Even if it sounds distasteful, the baiting of black bears with a bucketful of leftover jellies, meat scraps, fish and old doughnuts anchored in a pile of rocks or logs is so effective that the shooter who waits unseen (and not yet scented) atop a deer stand eventually will get a bruin.
     Moran apparently reflects the feelings of the majority of Northern Virginians, many of them relative newcomers from other states. In the 1950s and the years before that, when most of the residents were native Virginians, the voters of his district would have unceremoniously kicked Moran out on his ear for such anti-hunting feelings. It's a sign of the times we live in that people like Moran can safely assume constituents will be OK with his idea of slapping the hunters.
     Of course, Moran has the support of animal rights groups, such as the Humane Society of the United States. A little over six years ago, the HSUS tried to get bear baiting banned in Michigan and Idaho but was rebuked by voters in those states. They now appear to have gained a friend in the House.
     If Moran's bill fails, that doesn't mean the anti-hunters won't try again. And again. And again.
     And what about Illinois Senate Bill 2431, which would have handed the right to hunt (or not to hunt) to the American Veterinary Medical Association? The way the bill was worded, it would have allowed the AVMA to set standards for the euthanasia of wildlife.
      Pretty clever, isn't it? Imagine giving the puppy and kitty doctors the power to set wildlife euthanasia standards. Animal rights lawyers could easily have argued that such a bill, had it passed, would have applied to the dispatch of any wildlife species, including ducks, deer, doves, squirrels, geese — you name it. In other words, hunting would have come to a screeching halt. Not only that, such an euthanasia bill might have applied to all the fish and ended all sport angling.
     Happily, the Illinois Senate thought it best to leave wildlife management in the capable hands of the state's Division of Wildlife Resources.
     What the animal rights groups proved, however, is that they will travel any road, no matter how silly it might seem at the time, to take a chunk out of our American hunting heritage.
     Meanwhile, one must wonder how animal rightists can ever gain any ground. In the money department, the hunting community is the 800-pound gorilla in a pen full of squirrel monkeys.
     The Animal Use Issues Committee of the International Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies (IAFWA) not long ago released a report that showed how much money hunters spend to pursue their recreational activity. The report shows that hunting in America is big business, generating more than $67 billion in economic output, not to mention generating 1 million jobs.
     On average, every U.S. hunter spends more than $1,850 per year to pursue his passion. Multiply that by the low number of 13 million individuals that hunt, and pretty soon you're talking about some serious money. Actually, the number of hunters in the United States is variously pegged at between 13 and 16.5 million.
     You'd think that hunters could come up with enough money to counter the people who worship at the altar of animals. In fact, hunters have enough money to expose their lies and emotional rhetoric for all to see.
     Yet, time and the hunters' apathy has been on the animal religionists' side. 

     • Look for Gene Mueller's Outdoors column every Sunday and Wednesday, and his Fishing Report every Thursday, only in The Washington Times. E-mail: gmueller@washingtontimes.com.

Source: http://www.washtimes.com/sports/20030216-3153992.htm

 

Long Island University Brooklyn Campus
Voice of the people
 

Animal abuse
Norfolk, Va.: Re your Feb. 13 article "Roy anything but chicken": Roy Jones Jr. should retire his roosters and stick to boxing. Cockfighting is so cruel that it's illegal in all but two states, New Mexico and Louisiana. The owners of the fighting roosters pump them full of stimulants and drugs and attach razor-sharp spurs to their feet. The birds suffer broken wings and legs, punctured lungs, severed spinal cords and gouged-out eyes. Instead of looking for opportunities to "beat someone up," Jones should take steps to reduce violence and bloodshed by abandoning cockfighting.

Heather Moore, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals

You can e-mail the Daily News editors at
voicers@edit.nydailynews.com
Please include your full name, address and phone number. The Daily News reserves the right to edit letters. The shorter the letter, the better the chance it will be used.

Source: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/ideas_opinions/story/60238p-56355c.html

Courtesy: Marc R.


.........Some experts believe the outbreak began with illegal fighting cocks used for gambling........
 
 
More Poultry Disease Found in California
USAgNet Editors - 02/17/2003

Four more commercial poultry farms in California have been found with birds infected with exotic Newcastle disease. Exotic Newcastle disease, which is harmless to humans and does not affect the safety of poultry meat or eggs, has infected flocks in California, Nevada and Arizona. Some experts believe the outbreak began with illegal fighting cocks used for gambling or as part of backyard flocks kept for food.

Exotic Newcastle is easily spread by vehicles and wild birds and is tough to eradicate because many birds die without showing signs of infection. California, the 9th largest U.S. poultry producer with sales of $3 billion annually, has been hit the hardest by the outbreak

Source: http://www.wisconsinagconnection.com/story-national.cfm?Id=197&yr=2003


.........Some poultry ranchers breeding and improperly transporting game cocks for illegal fighting are getting bypassed while uninfected pet birds are being destroyed without adequate avenues for appeal........

Newcastle enforcers accused of bungled job
By L.C. GREENE, STAFF WRITER

PEDLEY -- Angry fowl owners and breeders charged the Exotic Newcastle Disease Task Force Friday with applying its rules haphazardly, at times eradicating the wrong flocks, and in general failing to provide adequate information to bird and poultry breeders.

Those owners leveled the criticism during a three-hour task force information meeting sponsored by the Mira Loma Chamber of Commerce that attracted more than 60 people to the Jurupa Valley Community Center in Pedley.

"You may have rules, but you don't go by them," Susan Swallow of Norco said of the task force's methods.

Some poultry ranchers breeding and improperly transporting game cocks for illegal fighting are getting bypassed while uninfected pet birds are being destroyed without adequate avenues for appeal, she said.

The poultry-killing exotic Newcastle disease was first detected in California in October of last year. The disease task force, consisting of state and federal agencies, has established quarantines in all seven Southern California counties and is systematically testing commercial and backyard flocks.

Infected or potentially infected flocks are targeted for destruction.

Though some of the harsh assessments Friday night might spring from misperceptions or false rumors, the task force is making every effort to listen to bird owners and correct problems, said task force member and California Department of Food and Agriculture veterinarian David Castellan.

"If it's broke, we want to fix it," he said.

Castellan agreed the task force's toll free information line effort has experienced problems with callers complaining they can't reach the right people.

"We need to make that 800 system work better," Castellan said.

The task force is also attempting to speed up its appeals process for ranchers whose birds are slated for destruction, he said.

A slow and unresponsive appeals process failed to save her flock of mostly pet geese, ducks, and chickens, said Susan Henry of Muscoy.

"I've lost every bird I owned," she said, noting that her birds were not tested for the disease.

Castellan agreed to look into the complaints lodged by Henry and other bird growers.

Flocks selected for destruction either have tested positive for exotic Newcastle disease or have come into contact with infected flocks, he noted.

The Mira Loma Chamber of Commerce agreed to host a second information meeting in about 45 days.

Though Swallow criticized the task force for unfair enforcement, she appealed to fellow ranchers to support the effort to eradicate the virus.

"They are not the enemy," she said of the task force members. "They have a really hard job."

L.C. Greene can be reached via e-mail atl_greene@dailybulletin.com or by phone at (909) 483-9337.

Source: http://www.dailybulletin.com/Stories/0,1413,203~21481~1183329,00.html
 

 
..........Some experts theorized the outbreak began with illegal fighting cocks used for gambling...........
 
 
Poultry disease infects 4 more Calif. farms-USDA
Reuters, 02.13.03, 11:13 AM ET


By Randy Fabi

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A highly contagious virus infected four more commercial poultry farms in California, the most reported in a single day since the outbreak began more than four months ago, the U.S. Agriculture Department said Thursday.

The Exotic Newcastle disease, which is harmless to humans and does not affect the safety of poultry meat or eggs, has infected flocks in California, Nevada and Arizona.

Some experts theorized the outbreak began with illegal fighting cocks used for gambling, or in small backyard flocks kept for food. Exotic Newcastle is easily spread by vehicles and wild birds and is tough to eradicate because many birds die without showing signs of infection.

California, the 9th largest U.S. poultry producer with sales of $3 billion annually, has been hit the hardest by the outbreak.

With the discovery of the disease in four more flocks, a total of 12 commercial poultry farms in the state have been infected, the USDA said.

The disease was discovered in October in a backyard flock in Southern California. Despite strict quarantines on affected counties, it spread to Nevada in January and was found in Arizona last week.

Agriculture Secretary Ann Veneman has formally declared an "extraordinary emergency" in all three states because of the avian virus.

The disease is a "threat to the U.S. poultry and bird industries," Veneman said in a Federal Register notice. "It constitutes a real danger to the national economy and a potential serious burden on interstate and foreign commerce."

About 1,600 state and federal officials are randomly stopping cars and going door-to-door in search of infected birds in the three states.

In California, most poultry shows at county and local fairs have been canceled for the year. Commercial chicken farms are sanitizing workers and trucks to try to protect their flocks from infection.

The only way to eradicate the disease quickly in commercial poultry is by destroying infected flocks and imposing a strict quarantine. Health officials have killed, double-bagged and buried nearly 2 million exposed or infected chickens.

Industry officials said they were concerned about the continued spread of the disease but remained confident the virus would not cut total U.S. poultry exports. Foreign countries have banned poultry from the infected states.

Of the three affected states, California is the only major poultry producer. However, it is not a major exporter.

Copyright 2003, Reuters News Service

Source: http://www.forbes.com/home_europe/newswire/2003/02/13/rtr879161.html
 
Source: http://www.forbes.com/work/careers/newswire/2003/02/13/rtr879161.html
 
Source: http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-chickens14feb14,1,2459272.story
 

 
..........Pacelle said ALF's tactics give the opposition ammunition and damage the image of other animal protection groups.......
 
If Pacelle Believes That Then Why Would The Humane Society Of The United States Be Aggressively Working To Stop The Texas Domestic Terrorism Bill HB433 For The Protection Of The Public Against Domestic Terrorism?
 
And Why Doesn't The HSUS Condemn ALF Instead Of Just Saying.......
 
.........There's sympathy for the motive but increasing antipathy for the means.......
 
 
 
2 strategies, same goal in activism for animals

By Jon Yates
Tribune staff reporter
Published February 16, 2003

Robin Webb stood in back of a cramped Logan Square storefront last week, his face flush and his fists clenched as he barked out orders to an attentive army.

Break windows, he implored the overflow crowd. Burn cars, stage protests, clog door locks with Super Glue.

"It is a war," said the 59-year-old British spokesman for the Animal Liberation Front, now almost shouting. "It is an all-out bloody war in which all of the victims have been on one side so far."

Webb likens ALF's fight to protect animals to the abolitionists' fight to end slavery. The FBI calls ALF a domestic terrorist group, and many animal welfare groups agree.

"Every freedom fighter has been deemed a terrorist," said Webb, who was in Chicago to speak at the Autonomous Zone, 2129 N. Milwaukee Ave., a social gathering spot that caters to activists. His presentation drew more than 50 people.

"I don't think the great-great-grandchildren of these activists will say `Why did you break the law in pursuit of this goal,'" he said later. "I think they'll say `Why didn't you do more?'"

The ALF, which has no leadership, no membership list and almost no discernible structure, has claimed responsibility for vandalism Feb. 2 at Supreme Lobster and Seafood Co. in Villa Park. Members of the group cut the brake lines and damaged the refrigeration systems on dozens of the company's trucks.

Later that day, the group sent an e-mail to the Tribune claiming it targeted Supreme Lobster because it was "responsible for the deaths of more than 1 billion sea creatures over the past 25 years."

Webb said he did not take part in the vandalism and does not know who did. But he does support it.

The ALF's primary tactic is to target companies that it believes harms animals and cause those companies economic pain, generally through property damage. The goal is to convince people that animals should not be exploited.

Webb and other ALF members say they go to great lengths to ensure no one is harmed in their attacks.

In the Villa Park incident, "ALF--No Brakes" was spray-painted on a bay door of a company building as a warning not to drive the trucks, Webb said. Even if the message was unclear, drivers should have been able to figure out the brakes were inoperable before they got out of the company lot, meaning the risk of injury was minimal, Webb said.

A Supreme Lobster official said the damage was discovered when a driver started a truck, pushed on the brakes and got no response. The truck came to a stop before leaving the parking lot and did not hit anything or anyone, according to officials.

In other cities, members of ALF and a sister group, the Earth Liberation Front, have staged protests, handed out leaflets and picketed. But it's the violent acts that have drawn attention.

The groups have broken into laboratories, blown up cars, burned buildings, spray-painted homes and set animals free. Over the past decade, ALF members have been responsible for millions of dollars in damage.

"No one wants to break the law, but they feel compelled," said Webb, who also has encouraged people to speak at schools and talk to lawmakers.

Webb defends the violent tactics he spelled out to activists.

"I was certainly explaining that that's one way of moving toward animal liberation because, unfortunately, the law has failed," Webb said. "These are tactics that have been used in the past and have been successful."

Others disagree. Wayne Pacelle, senior vice president of the Humane Society of the United States in Washington, D.C., says ALF's message can get lost amid the violence.

"There's sympathy for the motive but increasing antipathy for the means," Pacelle said. "It's clearly counterproductive. We believe you lose your moral authority when you resort to vandalism, threats of violence and other means of illegal conduct."

Pacelle said ALF's tactics give the opposition ammunition and damage the image of other animal protection groups.

Patti Strand agrees. As president of the Portland-based National Animal Interest Alliance, she advocates for animal welfare by working with businesses, research facilities and farmers.

"This movement likes to compare itself to other social welfare movements, but in those movements, like the civil rights movement, you had leaders that condemned violence," Strand said. "That's not the case with this group."

Strand believes ALF hurts the animal welfare cause.

"It just confuses the public about what it is they should be supporting," Strand said.

Webb brushes aside such criticism, saying groups such as the Humane Society and NAIA simply aren't willing to do what needs to be done to protect animals.

At the Autonomous Zone, he talks about how easy it is to throw a rock through a butcher shop window or walk by with a hammer in your hand, then suddenly have a glass-shattering convulsion.

"Violence?" he says. "I utterly condemn extremism and violence."

Then Webb waits a beat.

"I do not condemn the compassionate commandos of the Animal Liberation Front."

Copyright © 2003, Chicago Tribune

Source: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-0302160225feb16,1,1881784.story