Check this out, they are trying to make it illegal for you and I to talk about anything that would help one another raise our animals better. This is the cutting edge, the first line of thought police laws coming of age.The animal rights movement is not about animals, it's about forwarding a global Utilitarian agenda and Utilitarian management of the world. So far they've not been slowed down a bit and keep gaining speed.If it is ok to make a law about talking about animal health issues among ourselves, as we are not qualified, it is no stretch at all to make it against the law to speak of government, medicine, law, or anything else you don't have a degree and license to speak about.John
Friends I am back with this again........ I do not see any info so far from the net on any complaints from the Museum about protest on the showing of Round and Round. This movie is the Animal Rights Uncle Tom's Cabin. If we do not protest a fiction being shown as a prelude to reality then we deserve what we get. You need to fight this in Oklahoma. E-Mail the Museum and Call The Senators and Reps. in the Pro cocking counties and ask for their support. Remember THE MUSEUM IS STATE FUNDED!!!!!! GO GET UM... I sent my protest. snomnh@ou.edu is the E-Mail address. The Museum is located at the University of Oklahoma.
JIMDEM
A Register-Guard Editorial
IT'S ILLEGAL IN Oregon to strap razors to
roosters' legs, place them in a pit and force them to fight, often to the death,
for the amusement of spectators. Raising game birds for cockfighting, however,
is still allowed in Oregon. This loophole ensures a ready supply of fighting
birds for an inhumane "sport" that is illicit but widespread. The state
Legislature should close the loophole by approving House Bill 2086.
HB 2086 would elevate the crime of cockfighting, currently a misdemeanor, to a Class C felony, the same as dogfighting. More important, it would prohibit the breeding, raising and possession of gamecocks. Currently, gamecock breeders are able to claim that their birds will be sold in Mexico, the Philippines and other countries where cockfighting is legal. In fact, many of them are destined for bloody contests in places like Junction City and Coos Bay.
The Oregon House approved legislation similar to HB 2086 two years ago, but the bill died in the Senate. Opponents. led by Sen. Roger Beyer, R-Molalla, worried that anti-cockfighting legislation might somehow interfere with legitimate poultry businesses, such as raising birds for plumage used in fly-tying. Yet HB 2086 defines fighting birds narrowly. Before the state could obtain a conviction under the law, it would have to prove that a defendant intended that gamecocks be used for fighting purposes.
In the 2001 legislative session, gamecock breeders could claim that they were raising birds for sale in Louisiana, New Mexico and a few other states where cockfighting is legal. But federal legislation sponsored by Oregon Sens. Gordon Smith and Ron Wyden has outlawed interstate commerce in fighting fowl. Oregon should not aspire to be the supplier of gamecocks to the rest of the world, and it certainly should not make it easier for illegal cockfights to continue to flourish at home.
Some opponents also see HB 2086 and its predecessors as part of a larger agenda of animal rights groups that will eventually turn their attention to deer hunting or trout fishing. It's true that animal rights organizations are working to build support for the legislation.
But HB 2086 is also supported by the Oregon Association of Chiefs of Police, the Oregon State Sheriff's Association and other law-enforcement groups. Police officers know from experience that their efforts to crack down on illegal cockfighting are hindered by the absence of a law against the possession of fighting birds. They also have found that cockfighting is often associated with other criminal activity.
There's nothing sporting about cockfighting - it's cruel and barbaric. To prohibit cockfighting without banning the possession of fighting birds is like outlawing burglary, but not the possession of stolen merchandise. The Legislature can take a stand against cockfighting in Oregon and elsewhere by approving HB 2086.
Source: http://www.registerguard.com/news/2003/02/11/ed.edit.cockfighting.0211.html
The Animal Rights 'Industry' Gets
Teeth
Posted On February 11, 2003
The animal rights dogma seems to be gaining ground everywhere
you look -- even in state legislatures and governors' mansions. In Colorado,
lawmakers are set to debate a bill that would elevate the legal status of cats and
dogs, allowing their owners (among other things) to sue
veterinarians for "loss of companionship." San Francisco has already begun to toy with this
sort of dangerous precedent.
What few observers have recognized is that
such a new law could easily be reinterpreted to suggest new "rights" for all
sorts of animals, including lab rats and dairy cows. One need only look at the
animal rights organization Farm Sanctuary, which is pushing "sentient beings" city council declarations for cows, pigs, and
chickens. The group already argues, as does PETA, that livestock have the "right" to not be
eaten.
Elsewhere, New Jersey Governor James McGreevey has just unveiled
a new "animal welfare task force" that's causing a stir in the Garden State. The panel, says today's New Jersey
Star-Ledger, is "dominated by animal-rights activists," including representatives from the Humane Society of the United States (not
your local Humane Society -- think PETA with a 9-figure bank account) and a host
of other animal agriculture opponents.
But New Jersey's capitulation to
animal rights extremists was already underway before the governor weighed in.
Farm Sanctuary has been pushing since 2001 for a
vote in the state legislature that would ban veal production in New Jersey
(the bill could be passed as early as next month).
And just like their ill-advised effort to add pigs to Florida's constitution, the New
Jersey veal measure will undoubtedly be used for leverage in other states.
Farm Sanctuary, you may recall, paid a $50,000 fine in November for illegally
funneling $465,000 into Florida during the 2002 election cycle. And one of its
program managers is currently facing burglary charges in connection with a theft
from a New York farm (a category of crime that is
definitely on the upswing). On Friday, Farm Sanctuary's Gene Bauston told the
Ithaca (NY) Journal that over 1,500 animal rights activists have already
written prosecutors to demand that the charges be dropped. "It's all over the industry," Bauston brags,
acknowledging at last that animal rights is no longer just a weekend
pastime.
Source: http://www.consumerfreedom.com/headline_detail.cfm?HEADLINE_ID=1780
By SARAH COOKE
Associated Press Writer
.........On a 23-7 vote, the Senate also passed a bill that would make it a felony to kill an animal or abuse one to the point it must be euthanized. A similar animal cruelty measure was killed in the House last week.
Offenders could be sentenced to no more than two years in prison and $5,000 in fines under Senate File 125. The offense currently is a misdemeanor..............
Source: http://www.trib.com/AP/wire_detail.php?wire_num=101486