Worshipping An AR Man-Destroying God?

PETA: Outrageous, perhaps, but also ethical
Thank God for PETA.

Before you madly search your home for tar and feathers, I am not a card-carrying PETA member. Nor do I concur with many of the group's "extremist" views or tactics. PETA's 2003 exhibit comparing factory farm animals to Holocaust victims, for example, was a bad idea.

That said, however, I still thank God for PETA -- short for People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals.

The PETA folks have riled up more than a few ranchers and trappers, infuriated many a meat eater and hunter, and prompted outrage from Bible fundamentalists and game farm proprietors. They have crawled under the skin of those people who feel animals were put on this planet merely for human exploitation.

That's what they want to do. But PETA also does something else that hardly any other group does with any regularity:

It stands up for those that can't speak for themselves. It sticks its neck out. It takes chances. It displays a great deal of mettle for a cause it profoundly believes in.

Whether you mock the PETA people or deplore their methods or view them as hopelessly zealous, they have elevated the discussion of animal rights and animals' place in the world. Amid the paint-splattered fur coats and celebrities-in-the-nude advertisements, the group is prompting many people to re-evaluate their traditional thinking of wildlife and animal issues.

Put it this way: How great would our ignorance of such issues be if PETA did not exist?

Thanks to PETA, we now know much more about the inhumane actions of some traveling circuses, the cruelty of steel-jaw leghold traps and the illegal trade in endangered species.

Thanks to PETA, individual acts of heartlessness have been exposed nationwide, alternatives to laboratory animal testing are now being used, and communities across the country have banned the chaining or tethering of dogs (including Lincoln).

Thanks to PETA, McDonald's, Burger King, KFC and Wendy's have all inaugurated animal welfare research programs. PETA also has been in the trenches in the battles against dogfighting and cockfighting.

In probably its most noble cause, PETA was among the first to expose the many sins of factory farming. For these actions alone we should be thankful, says author Matthew Scully. In his new book, "Dominion -- The Power of Man, the Suffering of Animals, and the Call to Mercy," Scully writes:

"Feared for the truths they might tell, animal rights champions do not deserve our scorn. They deserve our admiration and our gratitude. Sometimes the most courageous thing is to state the obvious, and that is what they are doing when they tell us that to treat animals in such a way is cruel, abhorrent and inexcusable."

Now boasting a worldwide membership of 800,000, PETA continues to make headlines for some of its publicity efforts which, depending on your point of view, are either off-the-wall or bold. The group gained more attention recently when its Super Bowl ad was rejected by CBS, guaranteeing it thousands of hits and views on the Internet.

The commercial was a bit risqué, perhaps, but humorous and fairly tame when compared to the Super Bowl's halftime show and some of the other lackluster commercial spots. The gist of PETA's ad was that eating meat causes impotence. (You can view the 30-second ad at www.peta.org/feat/superbowl/.)

If you check out the commercial, you'll probably find it a bit offensive but quite amusing. That's sort of the way PETA has gone about its work for 24 years now.

Subtly and slowly, but surely and assuredly, PETA is changing the American consciousness. At times, change is imperceptible.

We may view PETA's actions as outrageous and radical, hardly giving them a second thought.

But I can't help but ponder: A decade or two down the road, might we wonder what took us so long to understand?

Pete Letheby is associate editor for The Independent.

Source     http://www.theindependent.com/stories/020604/opi_letheby06.shtml




Federal Lawsuit Filed to Stop Mass Killing Of Double-Crested Cormorants
Thursday February 5, 1:07 pm ET

NEW YORK, Feb. 5 /PRNewswire/ -- Four leading national and state animal protection and conservation organizations and several bird enthusiasts filed a lawsuit today in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, challenging the federal government's plan to kill tens of thousands of double- crested cormorants -- a migratory bird species protected by federal law and international treaty.
<snip>
Entire Article Available At   http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/040205/dcth040_1.html


Veterinary Pet Insurance Celebrates Atlanta's Pets at Pet Fest America

VPI Joins The Humane Society of the United States in Honoring Responsible Pet Ownership at Philips Arena

BREA, Calif., Feb. 5, 2004 (PRIMEZONE) -- Veterinary Pet Insurance (VPI) announced its sponsorship of The Humane Society of the United States' (HSUS) Pet Fest America(tm), a series of events designed to celebrate and honor the joy of pet ownership in a fun and festive atmosphere. The event features the athletic prowess of the IAMS(r) Superdogs, a troupe of family-owned dogs who have become nationally recognized for their ability to run, jump and retrieve at incredible speeds as well as perform a wide range of agility moves. The first event is in Atlanta at Philips Arena, Sunday, February 8, 2004 from noon to 6 p.m., with shows at 1:30 p.m. and 4:30 p.m.

Humane Society dismayed by trap check rules
National group wanted 24-hour check requirements

From Bend.com news sources
Reference Code: AR-13593

February 6 - The Humane Society of the United States (HSUS), the nation's largest animal protection organization with more than 85,000 members and constituents in Oregon, expressed extreme disappointment Friday with the Oregon Fish & Wildlife Commission (OFWC) for its failure to adopt more responsible trapping regulations to protect Oregon's wildlife...........
<snip>

Source: http://www.bend.com/news/ar_view%5E3Far_id%5E3D13593.htm 




Strange? Or Maybe Not So Strange When You Are Dealing With AR?

..........Officers said they had seen Martinez urging them to fight............

Dogfighting case faces stronger bite
 
San Antonio Express-News
 
Web Posted : 02/06/2004 12:00 AM
 
Eighteen-year-old Miguel Angel Martinez is out of jail, but his dogs are still behind bars.

The dogfighting charges filed against him after police said they witnessed him urging two pit bulls to fight will be the first in San Antonio to be prosecuted as a felony under the state's beefed-up dogfighting laws.

"We will be prosecuting aggressively," said Eddie Wright, one of the city's animal control investigators, who is helping police and the district attorney's office put together the case.

Police called animal control workers Wednesday night to remove a male and female pit bull. Officers said they had seen Martinez urging them to fight.

Wright said Martinez and family members tried a switch when animal control workers arrived, bringing out the female and a smaller male. But officers noticed the dog was wearing a different collar, and the third dog also was confiscated.

Martinez was released on $5,000 bond early Thursday morning.

A visit to the Martinez family house, in a Southwest Side neighborhood of chain link fences and crowing roosters, yielded little information. No one answered the door, and neighbors pled ignorance.

The three pit bulls now sit in separate cages at the Animal Care Services division of the San Antonio Metropolitan Health District. The female, a smallish black-and-white, sported cuts on her face. The larger of the two brindle-and-white males began wagging his tail and leaping up as soon as humans came near him.

The dogs' futures are in limbo. Wright this week is to file the paperwork necessary for an administrative hearing that will decide their fates.

A judge who decides that an animal has been treated cruelly generally has three choices: order it to a nonprofit shelter, have it sold at auction (generally done with livestock), or have it put down.

Most shelters will not accept fighting dogs, Wright said, and the dogs can't be handed over to another individual.

Dogfighting is illegal in all 50 states and a felony in 47. It has been a felony offense in Texas since September 2002.

The FBI does not keep statistics on the activity, but authorities believe it is on the rise.

They estimate, from breeder advertisements, Web sites and previous arrests, that at least 40,000 people in the United States breed or own pit bulls for fighting.

Dogs often are mutilated in their attempts to stay alive in the fighting pit. The loser may be nursed back to health, if valuable, or just shot or abandoned.

Dogfighting also is lucrative. A champion may be worth upward of $10,000. Professional underground rings see thousands of dollars waged for a single fight.

It also is a crime that is not prosecuted nearly enough, say officials with the Humane Society of the United States and other shelter organizations.

"I think it goes to the cost," said Nick Braden, a spokesman for the Humane Society of the United States.

"It's expensive to go underground and penetrate these rings."

Some states prosecute more aggressively than others, though, and Braden said those cases do act as deterrents.

"States just need to enforce the laws they already have on the books," Braden said.

Wright said that's exactly what he and the district attorney's office plan to do. With witnesses and police testimony, he said, "We've got a good case."

thamilton@express-news.net

The Associated Press contributed to this report.



Anti-Terrorism Bill Moving Through Committees in Washington

Washington residents are fighting back against the dangerous and destructive attacks of animal rights and eco-terrorists upon law abiding citizens.  Legislation to penalize the criminals involved in such acts has advanced in the Senate and needs continued support.

 After being voted out of the Senate Judiciary Committee, the Senate Ways and Means Committee heard testimony Thursday on Senate Bill 6114.  The bill, sponsored by Sen. Val Stevens, R-Olympia, would help to further identify and prosecute animal rights and ecological terrorists.  It calls for greater penalties for those participating in acts of animal and eco-terrorism.

 Senate Bill 6114 also creates specific penalties for those who finance or assist such acts of terrorism.  Animal rights or eco-terrorist organizations would be defined as any entity or coalition that uses fear, intimidation or coercion with the intent to obstruct a person from participating in lawful activities that involve animals or natural resources.

 During testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee, local farmers, sportsmen and law enforcement officials described the devastation inflicted upon the community as a result of animal rights terrorism.  Witnesses described the Animal Liberation Front’s (ALF) release of 10,000 mink from a farm in Sultan, Washington to protest the fur industry.  Although some of the animals were recovered, many were killed by automobiles and others attacked domestic pets at nearby homes.  This galling act of animal terrorism was one of many that prompted the creation of SB 6114.

 According to the FBI, animal and eco-terrorist groups are one of the largest and fastest growing terror threats in the country.  They are responsible for $60 million in damages in recent years.

 Senate Bill 6114 is modeled after the Animal and Ecological Terrorism Act, a draft bill prepared by the U.S. Sportsmen’s Alliance as a part of a nationwide campaign to end the increasing threat of animal and eco-terrorism. 

 Take Action!  Washington sportsmen should contact members of the Senate Ways and Means Committee and ask for their support on SB 6114. 

 

Senate Ways and Means Committee Members

 

Sen. Joseph Zarelli (chair)                                   360-786-7634

Sen. Mike Hewitt (vice chair)                                360-786-7630

Sen. Linda Evans Parlette (vice chair)                  360-786-7622

Sen. Don Carlson                                                 360-786-7696

Sen. Mark Doumit                                                360-786-7550

Sen. Darlene Fairley                                            360-786-7662

Sen. Karen Fraser                                                360-867-0011

Sen. Pat Hale                                                       360-786-7614

Sen. Jim Honeyford                                             360-786-7684

Sen. Steve Johnson                                             360-786-7692

Sen. Cheryl Pflug                                                 360-786-7608

Sen. Margarita Prentice                                       360-786-7616

Sen. Marilyn Rasmussen                                     360-786-7602

Sen. Debbie Regala                                              360-786-7652

Sen. Pam Roach                                                   360-786-7660

Sen. Larry Sheahan                                             360-786-7620

Sen. Betti Sheldon                                               360-786-7644

Sen. Shirley Winsley                                            360-786-7654


For more information about how you can protect your rights as a sportsman, contact The U.S. Sportsmen's Alliance, 801 Kingsmill Parkway, Columbus, OH 43229. Phone (614) 888-4868. E-Mail us at info@USSPORTSMEN.org

 

 

OGBA ANIMAL SPORTS RALLY RELEASE

"Don't tell me they have the right to come to the voters' box and tell us what is acceptable and what is not acceptable in rural Oklahoma," said Kelly Barger, a Pawnee gamefowl breeder.

"This has never been about chicken fighting or the people who fight chickens. This has been about personal rights, personal freedoms and the liberties we are granted under the Constitution."

As thousands of animal sports supporters gathered at the Capitol Wednesday, this was the thought that echoed down the halls of the Capitol. The blowing snow and rain could not dampen the enthusiasm of these hardy souls from rural Oklahoma. They had gathered to demand their constitutional rights.

These people came from all walks of life and all areas of the nation. Farmers, ranchers, teachers, lawyers, rodeo contestants, greyhound and racehorse breeders, gamefowl owners and many more occupations. All had one thing in common, the love of their sport and the unwavering desire to protect it and their rights.

Much to the dismay of the Humane Society and their sister organization the P.E.T.A , support in Oklahoma has gradually switched over to these animal sports groups. Oklahomans have came to realize that the label of barbaric inbred heathens that the Humane Society has tried to stamp on these people of animal sports is just not true.

A recent poll taken in the Tulsa area showed that 58% of those polled were against the 687 law which banned cockfighting and now sets in the Oklahoma Supreme Court by request of the Oklahoma Attorney Generals Office. This can only be attributed to the fact that Oklahomans, both rural and urban, are more in tune to the facts and are not as easily swayed by animal activist propaganda.

The rally at the Capitol was held mainly to support Senator Shurdens legislation asking for the county's in Oklahoma to decide this issue within the county itself. This bill (SB829) would make it where both rural and urban Oklahomans could decide what is best for their own county's. This bill is a relatively simple bill that could end all this, and at the same time satisfy both rural and urban Oklahomans. Why not take this approach and settle this running feud that will go on for years otherwise and save the people and the state of Oklahomans millions of dollars that is needed elsewhere.

                                              OGBA NEWSPAPER RELEASE

Courtesy:  OGBA News
 


Sabungeros’ warned against avian influenza

By Maricel V. Cruz, Reporter

Cockfight aficionados and breeders should be wary of the deadly avian influenza spreading in several countries in Asia, a lawmaker warned on Friday.

Nationalist People’s Coalition Rep. Generoso Tulagan warned of the danger to this group because migratory birds frequent the breeding farms in the country’s mountainous areas. 

Tulagan, member of the House Committee on Health, based his advisory on reports that some of those who were infected by bird flu in Thailand are sabungeros, or cockfight aficionados.

“It is in the best interest of the sabungeros and breeders [in the country] to take the warning seriously because they could be the next victims of this deadly virus,” he said.

Tulagan also urged the Arroyo administration to impose a temporary ban on the importation of game fowls. He said there is also a need to strictly monitor the birds being sold in pet shops.

“We have to take all the necessary precautions to prevent a bird-flu outbreak in the country.”

Sanitary inspectors must regularly check cock-breeding farms nationwide, particularly those situated in the mountainous areas.

Health authorities had warned fighting cocks could acquire the deadly bird flu through migratory birds, which flock to the country during winter.

The Department of Agriculture has already banned the importation of poultry from countries affected with bird flu to prevent the virus from entering the country.

Chicken, being the most marketable poultry product, is believed to be an effective carrier of the bird-flu virus. Other birds affected by the disease are quails, ducks and pet birds such as pigeons.





The Terror of 'Animal Rights'
By Alex Epstein
CNSNews.com Commentary
February 06, 2004

The "animal rights" movement is celebrating its latest victory: an earlier, more painful death for future victims of Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and Huntington's disease.

Thanks to intimidation by animal rights terrorists, Cambridge University has dropped plans to build a laboratory that would have conducted cutting-edge brain research on primates. According to The Times of London, animal-rights groups "had threatened to target the centre with violent protests ... and Cambridge decided that it could not afford the costs or danger to staff that this would involve."

The university had good reason to be afraid. At a nearby animal-testing company, Huntingdon Life Sciences, "protestors" have for several years attempted to shut down the company by threatening employees and associates, damaging their homes, firebombing their cars, even beating them severely.

Many commentators and medical professionals in Britain have condemned the animal-rights terrorists and their violent tactics. Unfortunately, most have cast the terrorists as "extremists" who take "too far" the allegedly benevolent cause of animal rights. This is a deadly mistake. The terrorists' inhuman tactics are an embodiment of the movement's inhuman cause.

While most animal-rights activists do not inflict beatings on animal testers, they do share the terrorists' goal of ending animal research -- including the vital research the Cambridge lab would have conducted.

There is no question that animal research is absolutely necessary for the development of life-saving drugs, medical procedures, and biotech treatments. According to Nobel Laureate Joseph Murray, M.D.: "Animal experimentation has been essential to the development of all cardiac surgery, transplantation surgery, joint replacements, and all vaccinations."

Explains former American Medical Association president Daniel Johnson, M.D.: "Animal research -- followed by human clinical study -- is absolutely necessary to find the causes and cures for so many deadly threats, from AIDS to cancer."

Millions of humans would suffer and die unnecessarily if animal testing were prohibited. Animal rights activists know this, but are unmoved. Chris DeRose, founder of the group Last Chance for Animals, writes: "If the death of one rat cured all diseases, it wouldn't make any difference to me."

The goal of the animal-rights movement is not to stop sadistic animal torturers; it is to sacrifice and subjugate man to animals. This goal is inherent in the very notion of "animal rights."

According to People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, the basic principle of "animal rights" is: "animals are not ours to eat, wear, experiment on, or use for entertainment" -- they "deserve consideration of their own best interests regardless of whether they are useful to humans."

This is in exact contradiction to the requirements of human survival and progress, which demand that we kill animals when they endanger us, eat them when we need food, run tests on them to fight disease. The death and destruction that would result from any serious attempt to respect "animal rights" would be catastrophic -- for humans -- a prospect the movement's most consistent members embrace.

"We need a drastic decrease in human population if we ever hope to create a just and equitable world for animals," proclaims Freeman Wicklund of Compassionate Action for Animals.

To ascribe rights to animals is to contradict the purpose and justification of rights -- to protect the interests of humans. Rights are moral principles necessary for men to survive as human beings -- to coexist peacefully, to produce and trade, to provide for their own lives, and to pursue their own happiness, all by the guidance of their rational minds.

To attribute rights to nonrational, amoral creatures who can neither grasp nor live by them is to turn rights from a tool of human preservation to a tool of human extermination.

It should be no surprise that many in the animal-rights movement use violence to pursue their man-destroying goals. While these terrorists should be condemned and imprisoned, that is not enough. We must wage a principled, intellectual war against the very notion of "animal rights"; we must condemn it as logically false and morally repugnant.

( Alex Epstein is a writer for the Ayn Rand Institute in Irvine, Calif. The Institute promotes the philosophy of Ayn Rand, author of Atlas Shrugged and The Fountainhead.)


Copyright 2004, Ayn Rand Institute


Source: http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewCommentary.asp?Page=/Commentary/archive/200402/COM20040206a.html



Sponsored By:
Mr. A's
DOG & POULTRY TONIC
For Poultry and All Livestock
Ask For Mr. A's At Your Local Store
http://lapcrl.com/Mr.A's/