.......We ignore the fact that citizens in dictatorships and socialist countries and in family fiefdoms have "more" rights in this regard than Americans under our Constitution........

Gullibility
MORE THAN ONE A MINUTE

Lately I have read a stream of press releases (i.e. news stories) about how quick and responsive the Federal government is when ranchers have wolf "problems" (livestock and/or dogs killed.) This surely reassures everyone who might be having second thoughts about what lies ahead with wolves coming to their backyards. If the Defenders of Wildlife "pays" for livestock losses and the government traps or kills offending wolves, what can be the problem? This is all reinforced by the steady stream of articles about how Jack and Jill take their kids on vacation to listen to wolves, all the while assuring us of how there is no danger and how rich our environment is because of the wolves.

Wolves were forced on five western states by the Endangered Species Act as illegally implemented by the US Fish and Wildlife Service and a coterie of animal rights and environmental extremists. Setting aside the basic illegality of the Act (a large concession) we were told that the Act was "necessary to save species on the brink of extinction." Based on "science" from Universities hungry for funds, we quietly watched as subspecies, races, populations, distinct populations, and even "distinct population segments" were listed. We watched private property "taken" without compensation in amounts amounting to billions for purpose that were not "public" as required in the Constitution. We watched Governors and their state agencies get threatened and then offered aid (the carrot and stick approach) to submit to federal seizure of their Constitutional authorities to manage plants and animals. Most recently we have watched the federal government dictate the forced reintroduction of wolves despite Governors and rural communities and ranchers and dog owners protests. Any defiance of federal dictates protecting wolves from any human intervention, no matter the harm caused by the wolves, evokes draconian penalties and destruction of citizen's lives.

Why do we just watch? Because of a law that is illegal and morally corrupt (placing animal and plant concerns ABOVE human [or citizen] concerns)? Because some professor and animal rights radical says it is "good" for the "environment?" Good for the environment? Decimated elk herds and deer populations? Dead dogs? Abandoned school bus stops? Increasing livestock losses? Ranches where grandchildren can no longer play outside? Open and growing Federal squashing of state and local Constitutional freedoms and jurisdictions? Decreasing hunting and hunting program revenues to state agencies? State agencies that act more and more like Federal agency contractors? Telling us that this is "good" is like Aztec priests assuring the thousands of slaves whose beating hearts they cut out on their pyramids that their sacrifice was "good" for that "noble society."

The Defenders of Wildlife payments to ranchers was never more than a fig leaf on the establishment and spread of wolves. Little of the actual harm from wolves was ever paid for and payments can and will be stopped when the wolves are no longer amenable to eradication. Wolves are and will continue to spread everywhere. There is no standard "wolf behavior" or "wolf habitat" anymore than there is a "wolf diet." Wolves are every bit as adaptable as coyotes. They can and do live everywhere from Cape Cod (where one attacked a little boy in his backyard) to sagebrush flats in Nevada where they kill female antelope (and their young) as they give birth. Wolves are bigger and just as smart. The notion that once the wolves are established in Nebraska and Texas and California and Missouri, etc., the federal government will fly in and remove problem animals is just, well, nuts. Even if they gear up to do it, the cost to all of us from rural victims to Chablis-drinking Bostonians will be a significant reason to raise taxes and further erode state authorities. Why? What possible "good" counterbalances this? The elimination of hunting? More government control of private property? Enactment of wide swaths of people-free (i.e. Wildlands) zones? How can anyone allow all this harm and disruption of a free society because some guy with a stake in it whines about how "important" or "good" wolves are "for the ecosystem."

This absurdity is not alone today. Dog owners ask the federal government to enforce registration, licensing, and inspections of breeders (the dreaded "P" word, no not "please", puppy mills) to run them out of business. Never imagining that the same technique will be use on the "rescue" people and the shelters and the "fancy" (dog shows) people, and then on the AKC itself. All in the name of "humane" treatment and a non-existent pet "over-population." State and city governments join in this pogrom to, like their Federal cousins, get reelected by harming a few Americans to get a bigger bunch of voters to vote for them.

State governments run and advertise bigger and bigger lotteries to take scarce dollars from the poor and middle class. This devastates poor families and their children nationwide. Simultaneously they bar cockfights because they are "inhumane" to chickens that do what they have done since time immemorial. States that would otherwise allow such fights are pressured by proposed Federal legislation to not allow them. When residents ask states for county options to hold such fights, they are blocked by national animal rights lobbying and urban disdain for a tradition that has existed worldwide for centuries. We ignore the fact that citizens in dictatorships and socialist countries and in family fiefdoms have "more" rights in this regard than Americans under our Constitution.

Fishermen and hunters acquiesce to government appeals for "Invasive Species" jihads run by Federal bureaucrats. Despite the fact that this will (along with Endangered Species) eliminate most hunting and fishing, they listen to the hollow assurances of their state agencies and their national organizations that showing concern and support is "progressive" and will help to make friends with those who have vowed to eliminate them. All the while the state agencies and the organizations plot and scheme to get "their" piece of the pie when legislation is passed. Ah, Pogo, where are you when we need you?

Over the past thirty years we have seen states and particularly the Federal government entertain withdrawing all societal protection for the aged, the infirm, the unborn, and even the disabled. We have seen cohabitation and gay unions given parity with marriage and children being raised in ever more callous homes. Likewise public schools have degenerated to abysmal levels of producing educated graduates. Meanwhile these same governments have elevated endangered species (and all their subdivisions) to levels of government protection and nurture beyond those given to citizens today. These same governments expand their interference into our daily lives and onto our property while claiming to not be responsible for the wolves they introduce or the plants and animals they say now dictate what you can or cannot do with YOUR property. Then they chant with the professors and the radicals how all this is "good" and "necessary" and "justified."

P. T. Barnum was wrong. There isn't a "sucker born every minute." There are thousands born every minute in today's world.

Jim Beers
29 January 2004

This article and other recent articles by Jim Beers can be found at
http://www.allianceforamerica.org/bb/viewforum.php?f=91

Jim Beers is available for consulting or to speak. Contact:
JimBeers7@earthlink.net

Source http://www.allianceforamerica.org/bb/viewtopic.php?t=1496&sid=807dd9fe931b54dfd225a3aae4566612


A Letter to a State

Dear Mississippi;

I am a Virginian but I have long been a fan of Mississippi. It isn't just because of William Faulkner or your famous duck hunting. It is mainly from all of your sons I had the privilege to work with over the years. They were all rural guys with bedrock American values and a love for their home. The fact that you don't have a big city to steer your state in goofy directions like most other states is probably a big factor in your ability to maintain the values and freedoms that the Federal government is slowly absorbing from the other states.

This nation is involved in a struggle to determine whether our future will be one of individual rights and freedoms like you know in Mississippi or whether it will be the future envisioned by the environmental and animal rights radicals who are growing the Federal bureaucracy to enforce laws meant to make people like you forfeit your way of life. They aim to do away with the Mississippi way of life and replace it everywhere with Brooklyns run by Federal bureaucrats and environmental and animal rights activists. Restrictions on hunting and fishing, endangered species taking peoples property, state agencies acting more like units of Federal agencies, restrictions on dog breeding and dog ownership, forced introduction of deadly predators, closures of public lands, restrictions on public land use, devastation of rural communities, and restrictions on circuses, cockfighting, and rodeos are but a few of the things growing worse each year.

I mention this because as we look for ways to preserve our American values and freedoms, a state like Mississippi may hold the key. The key for all of us may be a state with rural and traditional values and no big city to overshadow it to show the way for the rest of us.

If your state and local politicians can stand up to the environmental and animal rights radical organizations that are steadily stopping all domestic and wild animal use maybe, just maybe, other state and local politicians can take heart and follow your lead. If your US Representatives and your US Senators can be advocates for citizen rights to use the environment and public lands we will all benefit. If they can also stand tall for the use of wild (public property held in trust) and domestic (private property) animals, your influence on the United States may never be greater or more needed.

America's past reflects a society where Catholics and Protestants, blacks and whites, and rural societies like Mississippi and urban communities like New York recognized their differences and agreed to live and work together for the benefit of each other. Today the environmental and animal rights extremists want to divide us, depopulate the rural places like Mississippi, make us all vegetarians, remove most of the rural population into urban centers, and place us under an all powerful central government.

Mississippians, it may very well be that you are the best hope for America's future. While we struggle to keep our pets and our duck blinds we can only ask a fair state like yours to use your unique strengths to preserve the freedoms that have made America and Mississippi great.

Thanks.

Jim Beers
29 January 2004


Source http://www.allianceforamerica.org/bb/viewtopic.php?t=1497&sid=807dd9fe931b54dfd225a3aae4566612



The Garden City Telegram - Kansas

Culture clash

By SCOTT ALDIS-WILSON
scottaw@gctelegram.com

Michael Hernandez wants to bring back the Friday night fights. The cockfights, that is, and legal ones.

Standing outside his residence off West U.S. Highway 50 on Jan. 19, Hernandez pointed to some of the male chickens he has been raising since 1980. Some of them could be fighters, he said, but if he can't do it in his home county, he might stop raising them.

"Right now, this could be the last time we see this," he said.

Nearly two years after state legislation eliminated any gray legal territory over the sticky subject of cockfighting, Hernandez said, he feels like the law was a strike against his culture and the eliminator of a potential source of state revenue.

Now, he said, he is trying to feel out support to look at changing the law. Since August 2002, he said, he has been trying to contact elected state officials like Gov. Kathleen Sebelius; Rep. Ward Loyd, R-Garden City; and Sen. Steve Morris, R-Hugoton; as well as local groups like the American Legion, to make his case.

In a match, he said, gamecocks are weighed and put into classifications that cannot vary by more than two ounces, then each is fitted with a "boot" on each leg's natural spur with items like a one-inch knife.

The cocks, he said, are put in a ring where they will fight until one either dies or a bird's beak hits the ground twice.

Cockfighting has been around in Finney County since the turn of the century, brought north from Mexico, Hernandez said, and is as much a part of the culture as mariachi music.

In fact, Hernandez said, the practice is comparable with the tradition of pheasant hunting that no one is trying to outlaw.

"How can we be criminals if it was passed down as part of our culture?" he said.

He pointed to a clearing of packed dirt in a shelter outside his home near a couple of roosters in cages.

"To tell you the truth, we used to do it here because there was no law against it," he said.

The recent law, he said, became effective July 2002 and specifically prohibits gamecocks from being set to injure one another.

According to a list compiled in October by The Humane Society of the United States, cockfighting is illegal in all states except New Mexico and Louisiana.

Kansas is one of 18 states where it is a misdemeanor offense. In Kansas, it is legal to own the implements of the practice and the fighting gamecocks, but a misdemeanor to organize or attend a match.

Not that it means it isn't still happening in the area. Hernandez said it is still happening in Finney County, Dodge City, Emporia and Wichita, though he doesn't participate himself.

"Every Friday night, they're having a chicken fight," Hernandez said. "It's a big sport."

Finney County Sheriff Kevin Bascue said the county hasn't had any investigations on cockfighting in recent years.

"That's not to say it isn't happening. Never say never," he said. "I can only speculate that I'm sure it's going. It's just a little more covert."

At least once in recent history a cockfighting operation was broken up by the sheriff's office. In late December 1998, deputies responded to an address in Yucca Drive and seized $2,138, along with spurs, scales and roosters while about 25 people were observed at the fight.

Even before state law changed, both Bascue and Garden City Police Department Capt. Mike Utz said cockfighting can still be interpreted to violate the state's cruelty to animals and gambling statutes.

Glenda Hopkins, president of the Finney County Humane Society, said her group's basic objection would be to the suffering animals undergo during the fights.

"I can't see a positive part to any of the thought of legalization," she said. "Personally, I think it teaches people that animals are worthless throwaway items."

The argument that it is a cultural tradition, she said, doesn't make it right.

"In some other countries, cutting other people's hands off because they're convicted of stealing is part of some cultures," she said.

But aside from being a cultural issue, Hernandez said, he feels cockfighting and the betting it brings in could mean serious money to a state in need of extra revenue. In New Mexico, he said, the events obey tax law and have entry fees, as well as the money brought in by concession sales and tourism.

"It's an honest way for people to make a living who can't get a good job," he said. "I love these birds. I love to take care of them, but I want to bring in some money."

David Sells, a veterinarian with Garden City Veterinary Clinic, said he grew up with cockfighting in Lyons and can remember roosters piercing an opponent's lungs, causing the unlucky one to choke on his own blood. Though one rooster would sometimes quit in matches, he said, most often one ended up dead.

"To me, that's just inhumane," he said. "I don't think it's worth the money."

Right or wrong, the practice is currently illegal.

Loyd said the only way to change the law either would be to convince a legislator to sponsor changes or to drum up the public support to make legislators take notice. Right now, he said, Hernandez would have a better chance with the second option.

"I haven't heard any discussion about it from a legislative standpoint," he said. "As I indicated to Mr. Hernandez, I do not perceive there is support."

Source http://www.gctelegram.com/news/2004/january/30/story1.html



East Naples man sent to prison on drug-related charges

By CHRIS W. COLBY, cwcolby@naplesnews.com

An East Naples man whose cockfighting case sparked a feud between prominent Naples defense attorneys was sentenced Friday to prison.

Victor A. Valdes received concurrent terms of 10 years in prison on two drug-related charges and five years in the cockfighting case. The drug counts are unrelated to the cockfighting charge, which is a felony.

Valdes, 42, was represented by Mike Carr, an attorney well-known for his opposition to animal cruelty. He has lobbied state lawmakers for stiffer sentences for those convicted of animal cruelty and performed free legal work for several animal rights groups and people involved in such cases.

Carr's representation of Valdes drew criticism last year from Donald Day, who accused Carr of hypocrisy by representing a client who's charged with crimes that Carr has vocally, actively opposed.

Carr defended himself, saying Valdes is a family friend. The drug charges were much more serious than the animal cruelty, otherwise he likely wouldn't have taken the case, Carr said.

Valdes was arrested Feb. 14, 2002, and charged with running a cockfighting operation out of his Lafayette Lane home. Investigators found about 300 fighting roosters in cages on Valdes' property, according to the arrest report. Also inside were a ring used for fighting, ledgers showing results from previous fights and spurs for the roosters' feet to inflict damage on their opponent.

In addition to the one count of cockfighting, he was also charged with two counts of trafficking in cocaine, two counts of drug sale and one felony count of drug possession.

Collier Circuit Judge Lauren Miller sentenced Valdes, who pleaded no contest to all six charges, to concurrent sentences of five and 10 years, the latter of which was for the trafficking counts.

Valdes also received a $100,000 fine, according to court records.

Source http://www.naplesnews.com/npdn/news/article/0,2071,NPDN_14940_2618705,00.html


.......We ignore the fact that citizens in dictatorships and socialist countries and in family fiefdoms have "more" rights in this regard than Americans under our Constitution........



Spinning A Confiscation Of Personal Property And A California Killing Because They Were?
..........believed to be bred for cockfighting........



Officials confiscate, kill 150 birds in Chino

CHINO - More than 150 birds believed to be bred for cockfighting were confiscated and later destroyed when authorities raided a house Thursday in Chino, humane society officials said.

Investigators also found training equipment, performance-enhancing drugs and knives, which are often attached to roosters' feet during fights, at the home in the 12800 block of Wright Avenue, said Allie Jalbert, cruelty investigator with the Inland Valley Humane Society & SPCA.

Following an investigation that began in November 2003, authorities descended on the half-acre lot belonging to Rafael and Lilia Cueva, who were not arrested and voluntarily gave up the fowl, which included both roosters and hens.

Many of the birds showed evidence of previous injuries, including one with a missing eye. All were euthanized because of their aggressiveness and lingering fears over the spread of exotic Newcastle disease.

"They're fighting cocks," Jalbert said "and aren't really adoptable animals."

The Chino Police Department and Chino code enforcement assisted the humane society in its investigation.

- Jannise Johnson, (909) 483-9318

Source http://www.dailybulletin.com/Stories/0,1413,203~21481~1926396,00.html





100 years young, and still dancing

By Mel Orpilla

What does a 100-year-old Filipino do to keep himself young? Go dancing every chance he gets. That's the secret to staying young and reaching the century mark for the oldest Manong (Filipino old-timer) in Vallejo. Manong Frank Fabillaran celebrated his 100th birthday on Thursday. Manong Frank is one of a handful of Manongs still alive in Vallejo, who arrived in America in the 1920s.

Manong Frank was born in Vigan, Ilocos Sur, on Jan. 29, 1904. His parents had a small farm where they raised corn, rice and peanuts. "My job on the farm was to plow the fields," said Manong Frank. During his youthful years on the farm, Manong Frank's favorite pasttime was cockfighting. "Every Sunday I'd go to the cockfights," smiled Manong Frank.
<snip>

Source http://timesheraldonline.com/articles/2004/01/31/opinion/todays_column/column.txt




Sponsored By:
Mr. A's
DOG & POULTRY TONIC
For Poultry and All Livestock
Ask For Mr. A's At Your Local Store
http://lapcrl.com/Mr.A's/