Fuzzy
thinking
It would be hilarious if it were not so pathetic -
animal rights activists trying to get a law passed recognizing animals as
persons when we can't even recognize that preborn children are
persons.
This is fuzzy thinking at its worst and a prime example of the
complete lack of logic contained in their belief that "animals are people
too".
At the basis of this illogical outlook is a philosophy based on
Darwinism run amok - that somehow all living beings are essentially the same,
except creatures like dolphins and some primates who are actually more
intelligent than people, but can't communicate with us yet.
An educational system which long ago threw out the study
of logic is one root cause of the ridiculous ideas promoted by minds trained not
to think.
P. Herbert
Racine
Fuzzy
thinking
Or
Does It Sound
Like Something Was Illegal
Or
Does It Sound
Like If You Don't Live The Way The AR Think You Should
Then.......
........the animals were
seized when investigators' recommendations were not
followed.........
Windward Oahu Man Faces 55 Counts
of Animal Cruelty
HONOLULU (AP) -
A Windward Oahu man has been charged with 55 counts of animal cruelty after
64 dogs were removed from his Kahaluu home last Saturday.
Hawaiian Humane Society spokeswoman Jacque Smith says James Montgomery was
charged with animal cruelty for each adult dog seized.
Several newborn puppies were among the dogs seized, and two later died.
No date has been set for the arraignment.
Humane Society officials say they tried to work with Montgomery and his wife
to improve living conditions for the dogs.
Smith says the animals were seized when investigators' recommendations were
not followed.
Montgomery also could face child endangerment charges.
The couple's three children -- ages 9, 12, and 14 -- were removed from the
Mahakea Road home on Tuesday and placed in emergency foster care.
Police say the residence was extremely unsanitary and unhealthy, and was
littered with trash and animal feces.
Source: http://www.khnl.com/Global/story.asp?S=2898686
Could We Call This Fuzzy Thinking From Georgia And
Kansas
Or
Just Plain, I'm Better Than You "Bubba"
Or
Up
With Equality For Animals And Down With "Good Ole Boys"
Or
If PETA Has To Be Asked What They Think, Then No One Is Thinking,
Period
Georgia........
'In this corner, standing one foot, one
inch tall...'
Phil Hudgins, Senior Editor, CNI Newspapers
Picture
this: You're in Norman, Okla., and you're looking for something to do. You've
been to the Lloyd Noble Center to hear the sweet voices of the Fifth Grade
Chorus, but you want some excitement.
You spot a sign on a telephone
pole: "Boxing Tonight." You check out the time and find your way
there.
You buy a ticket and enter the Sam Noble Oklahoma Museum of
Natural History. The fight is about to begin. The boxing ring is a bit small,
you notice, so you ask the guy next to you how old these boxers are. "Oh," he
says, "'bout 6 months old, I expect."
That's when you realize, just as
the fighters enter the ring, that this is no ordinary boxing match. These
fighters are chicken.
Literally. They stand about a foot high, have small heads
like a peacock, the bodies of a double-crested cormorant, deep eyes, long upper
legs, short lower legs, wings neatly wrapped like a shell, and long, strong
necks.
Cockfighting, outlawed in Oklahoma in 2002, has made a
comeback.
None of this is true, of course. But it could be, if State Sen.
Frank Shurden has his way.
Shurden, according to the Associated Press,
wants to bring back chicken fights, but with safety measures. Instead of wearing
razor-like spurs, the roosters would wear tiny boxing gloves on their feet. That
way, the senator says, the chickens could fight without shedding
blood.
Now, lest you think I'm making fun of Oklahoma, let me say that a
push to legalize cockfighting - or dogfighting or canary fighting or possum
fighting - is possible in any state where good old boys live. Where two or more
GOB's are gathered, there some kind of weird activity will be also.
For example, Gainesville, Ga., where I grew up, is a
sanctuary for 20,000 good old boys, give or take a few thousand, and millions of
chickens. Just think what could happen if the GOB's were allowed to develop a
rooster with Mike Tyson's meanness and Barry Bond's steroids. He could beat the
socks off any cocky little rooster from Oklahoma.
But, back to Oklahoma,
where Sen. Shurden says cockfighting with gloves could save the state's gamefowl
industry, which I suppose is something you'd want to save. Removing blood from
the sport, he says, eliminates the main argument animal-rights groups use
against cockfighting.
So, PETA members, what do you think? Would gloves
and muffs take away the cruelty? No beast gets hurt, unless there's a fight in
the bleachers.
It's a stupid idea, isn't it? Sort of like putting huge
pads and spring-loaded rubber bumpers on racing cars.
Forget it, Senator.
Either rehabilitate those roosters or barbecue 'em.
Kansas..........
Not
bettin' on rooster boxin'
By Rebecca Bauman, Staff Writer
My Grandma Nell is a Texan, tried and
true. She doesn't feel that there's much cause for change in the world, and when
I ask her to stop calling the little people who run her local flower shop
"midgets," she'll twitch her nose, sigh and protest: "Well, that's what they
are!"
Grandma doesn't want to modernize; she wants to sustain older and
rather decrepit thoughts and ideas and phrases. When she'd mention the phrase
"cockfighting" I'd always snicker, and that woman would spank me blue for having
a dirty mind.
I doubt, though, that even Grandma Nell could refute that
there's something pretty sick about what's going on in Oklahoma.
The
state's legislature outlawed the "blood sport" of cockfighting back in 2002,
making Oklahoma one of the last states to hop on the pro-rooster bandwagon.
However, in banning the fights, some officials claim that the state has been
deprived of a business that's worth an estimated $100 million.
Thank
heavens, then, for Oklahoma Sen. Frank Shurden. The man has gallantly leapt into
the ring (just in time for the February legislative session) with a solution
that he feels will preserve the livelihood of not only a hearty cluster of his
home state's population, but the dignity and pride a cockerel feels in ripping a
fellow fowl's beak off with his toes.
Shurden is now pushing for a bill
that will allow gamecocks to participate in fights without bloodshed - events in
which sparring roosters will wear "little boxing gloves" as well as lightweight,
chicken-sized vests embroidered with electronic sensors that record hits and
help keep each bird's score.
Shurden says he knows a guy in California
who'll make the vests cheap, allowing his proposed Oklahoma Pari-mutuel Gamecock
Boxing Act to take off like a chicken with a jet engine strapped to its
tukus.
For those of you who aren't familiar with cockfights, allow me to
explain what goes on at these get-togethers:
Normally, two cockerels are
suited with razor blades. The blades are attached to their feet, and the
roosters are then thrown into a ring, agitated and pushed to peck and slash at
each other until one dies. It's a betting game - spectators put money on the
bird that they think will survive.
What Shurden proposes is that fight
promoters nix the razors and, instead, slip tiny boxing gloves over each
rooster's natural spurs.
Now, folks, I'm a vegetarian, but even I would
lay my money down to see a rooster wearing leather mittens. I'd never say that
cockfighting had much class before, and I'd never want to deny some yokel the
right to lose his money on a bird named "The Chubb."
However, I can't
imagine Sen. Shurden being absolutely sincere in his promotion of this idea. As
anyone who's ever seen a cockfight knows, it ain't about the sport - it's about
the blood.
Boxing gloves on sparring cocks will work the day my Uncle
Bernie goes deer hunting with a Nerf bat, the day my cousin Leon goes fishing
with salad tongs, or the day my Grandpa Willard rids his house of mice by
playing a Phil Collins album.
Statesmen used to get what they wanted with
the use of a nice, clean filibuster. Now they suit barnyard animals with hats
and gloves and strings of pearls and say:
"You want compromise? Look how
much better things are when we all comprise!"
Flannel-clad,
pitchfork-carrying farmers across the four-states will weep, and no one wants to
see an old man cry.
Granted, I'm happy that politicians are getting
creative. But it's so-called creativity that could very well be launching the
lot of our Social Security into the spastic world of Wall Street. It's
creativity that got Reaganomics humming through the 80's and it's hard core
creativity that made Ross Perot a viable presidential candidate.
I don't
think that it's best to dress up our birds before we dress down the manipulative
schlock we see in modern American politics. Let me see the preserved green in
Alaska's proposed oil fields before I see the red of a rooster doing his best
Tyson impression. (Which, I have to admit, would probably be dead on.)
I
think Grandma Nell would admit that Sen. Shurden should be tarred and feathered
for wasting our time.
And then he can box with his fellow fowl.