.....I don't believe the good citizens of New Mexico wish to bestow their rights to property ownership or their pursuit of happiness on a "sandwich meat.".......

 

Don't kill cockfighting

I was very saddened by a column I recently read, "Making a bird fight your battle? What're you, chicken?" (by Dan Shingler, Tribune, Feb. 26).

The column asks, "Who's to say cockfighting is better than drugs anyway? Who says abusing your own body is worse than forcing animals to abuse theirs?"

Does this writer really value the well-being of a chicken over that of his fellow man? Is this also the general opinion of The Tribune's staff?

I don't believe the good citizens of New Mexico wish to bestow their rights to property ownership or their pursuit of happiness on a "sandwich meat."

The writer of this animal-rights propaganda is not only misinformed but also is very defaming in his tone regarding many peoples' cultural heritage. . . . Apparently it is in fashion and politically correct to crusade for a chicken and trample the rights of those embracing a few-thousand-years-old tradition. If our culture offends you, you don't have to participate. We embrace and celebrate our culture but don't force it on anyone else.

We certainly don't have the money or media influence that the animal rights' groups have. . . . We are simply average, God-fearing New Mexicans who wish to be allowed to keep our traditions, and we do not like to be compared to Christian-killing Romans or slave-traders. Were those Christians no better than a chicken? Were those slaves animals?

Today, these animal-rights' extremists are trying to outlaw cockfighting. Tomorrow it will be rodeo and on and on, until the animals have rights and the people have none. Please don't fall for this hype. The issue is not "animal abuse," the issue is animal use.

Supporting a ban on cockfighting in New Mexico is the same as giving away your freedom to embrace your own culture. Please support the rights of the people of New Mexico. Lend your fellow man a hand, and let's work on fixing the real problems of this state. Do it for your children and your children's children. Let's leave them at least one state where they can have the same choices concerning their culture that we have had.

The proud tradition of cockfighting was not invented by this generation. Please do not destroy what you do not understand.

-- Charles VanHoozen, Las Cruces

 

Source: http://www.abqtrib.com/albq/op_commentaries/article/0,2565,ALBQ_19866_3601404,00.html

 
 


 
 
......He made animals into little people with fur.......
 

Cockfighting bill could alter a way of life




Knight Ridder

Cradling the big black and white rooster in his arms, Joshua Brock, 15, stroked its feathers, then set it on the ground next to a similar bird tied to a 6-foot nylon cord.

Instantly, the two birds glared malevolently at each other. The neck feathers flared, and in a flash, they became a tangled blur of flailing wings, beaks and feet, battling in the air.

"You don't have to make 'em; they'll just keep going," Joshua said, pulling his rooster away after a few seconds.

Joshua and his dad make no pretense about why buyers across the United States purchase the gamecocks they breed behind their home in the Blue Ridge foothills of rural Oconee County, 135 miles west of Charlotte, N.C.

"They're good fighting chickens," said Ronnie Brock, 50, an affable, soft-spoken man who was wearing a "Property of My Grandkids" T-shirt the day a reporter came visiting.

Cockfighting, where birds are fitted with 2-inch long needlelike steel "gaffs" and fight to the death as spectators bet on their fates, is illegal in South Carolina. But it's not illegal for Brock and an estimated 2,500 other breeders to raise and sell gamecocks in the state.

The S.C. law against cockfighting is one of the nation's weakest.

Animal rights activists and some top state officials and lawmakers want to change that.

A bill, introduced by House Speaker David Wilkins, R-Greenville, would make all aspects of cockfighting - from raising the birds for fighting purposes to staging the fights themselves - a felony punishable by up to five years in prison. Currently, it is a misdemeanor with a maximum fine of $100, less than some traffic violations.

In North Carolina, cockfighting is a misdemeanor on first conviction. The law allows a maximum fine of up to $1,000, and repeat offenses are felonies.

Still, the practice continues. Authorities in Union County, N.C., cited dozens of men attending a cockfight about 35 miles south of Charlotte in Union County.

The bill's supporters say they have no easy task. Cockfighting is woven into South Carolina's culture. The University of South Carolina's athletic teams call themselves "The Fighting Gamecocks."

Attorney General Henry McMaster, who is helping push the bill, said, "There are people who think that cockfighting is perfectly OK; it's been going on for a long time in this state, and they don't see any harm in it. There will be organized resistance."

Sen. Harvey Peeler, R-Cherokee, said although he doesn't object to tougher penalties for cockfighting, he will fight attempts to make it illegal to raise gamecocks for sale out of state. "Grit and Steel," the leading national cockfighting magazine, is published in Peeler's hometown of Gaffney.

"It's a big industry up our way," Peeler said.

The catalyst for Wilkins' bill was the indictment and arrest in July of Charles Sharpe, the S.C. Commissioner of Agriculture, on federal charges of taking $15,000 in payoffs to protect a cockfighting ring in Aiken County. In a plea agreement last month, Sharpe pleaded guilty to two of the 12 counts and is awaiting sentencing.

On a hillside behind Ronnie Brock's home, 300 chickens live in rows of cages.

They strut, preen and crow in a spectacular variety of breeds and colors from the deep garnet of the Kelso Reds to the iridescent blue tails of the McLean Hatches.

Brock admits to watching cockfights in Tennessee and elsewhere - he's vague about the locale. But he objects to portrayals by some that he and other cockfighters are lowlifes.

"They can't just classify us as trash and the scum of the earth just because we love chicken fighting," said Brock, a father of five whose full-time job is doing maintenance for the town of Seneca's parks department. "It's just this plain little Joe who goes to work every day, and he's got a little hobby with his chickens," he said. "In my case, it's a livelihood. If I want to fight them, I don't think it's nobody's business. I don't think it's cruel; this is just like a chicken that you're selling to eat."

So far this year, Brock said, he has sold 40 chickens, shipping them to points as far away as New Mexico, one of only two states - the other is Louisiana - where cockfighting remains legal.

Purebred adult gamecocks start at $100; a breeding trio of a rooster and two hens goes for $300 to $400.

Clifton Bryant, a professor of rural sociology at Virginia Tech University, said many of the people involved in cockfighting are country folk who continue to see animals in the same light that most Americans did several generations ago. Cockfighting was illegal in most places then, too; the current S.C. law dates from 1877. But, Bryant said, it was for a different reason than now.

"Cockfighting was condemned simply because you wasted time that you should have been working, doing something productive," he said.

Before the 1930s, Bryant said, most Americans lived on farms and saw animals as devices.

Walt Disney changed that, Bryant said.

"He made animals into little people with fur. And as we became more citified, we changed the way we looked at animals, and in the way we looked at pursuits like hunting and cockfighting," Bryant said.

Most societies have some way of dealing with what might be a basic need to observe violence, Bryant said. Brock said if cockfighting is completely banned, "They're just taking a sport away that they don't really understand. To me, it's like playing a ballgame; it's just that this bird is part of the sport," he said.

 
Source: http://www.myrtlebeachonline.com/mld/myrtlebeachonline/news/local/11070635.htm
 
 

 
From: Responsible Pet Owners Alliance
Subject: 2nd TX Action Alert! Animal Cruelty Bills

From Responsible Pet Owners Alliance, the reasonable voice regarding animal issues.
Responsible Pet Owners Alliance is an animal welfare organization, not "animal rights" and, yes, there is a difference.
Permission granted to crosspost.

TX:  Action Alert!
Opposition to Animal Cruelty Bills
Permission to crosspost.

Time is of the essence!  Have you made your phone calls opposing these bills?  We must stop these bills from passing out of committee!  Please call ALL committe members.   Legislators' offices are recording "For" and "Against" phone calls.  Register your opposition.  Legislators are receiving 100 calls per day from "animal rights" extremists.

WIth HB 326, Texas Humane Legislation Network (THLN) is trying to eliminate "intent" from our existing state animal cruelty law.  If charged, the burden of proof that an act was NOT "reckless" will be upon you.  Keep existing law.

The definition of "Animal" has been changed to "domestic or wild" in HB 590 and to a "nonhuman animal, bird, or captive amphibian or reptile" in HB 326. Existing law excludes wild animals.  This is of special concern.  Keep existing law.

THLN is a coalition of "animal rights" activists and seeks to remove the exemption for fishing, hunting, and trapping in existing law.  HB 590 drops this proposed wording in an attempt to lessen opposition to the bills from sportsmen.  Don't be fooled.  Texas already has a very stringent Animal Cruelty Act.  Keep the existing law.

Please contact ALL of the legislators below and "Just Say No" to these Animal Rights Bills.

Copies of the Bills can be found at:  http://www.capitol.state.tx.us
Type in the bill number.
HB 326
HB 590
SB 172

The two House bills are in the Agriculture & Livestock Committee:

Agriculture & Livestock Committee:
Clerk:  Shannon Sneary, Phone (512) 463-0762

HB 326
Author:  Representative Toby Goodman
Toby.Goodman@house.state.tx.us
Phone:  (512) 463-0562
Fax:  (512) 475-1178
1)  Adds "or recklessly" which eliminates "intent."
2)  Changes "Animal" to a nonhuman animal, mammal, bird, or captive amphibian or reptile.
3)  Adds "trains or conditions" a dog for fighting.
4)  Removes existing exemption for fishing, hunting or trapping, making it a defense to prosecution instead.  This means a defendant would have to hire an attorney and go to court to defend themself.

HB 590
Author:  Fred Brown
fred.brown@house.state.tx.us
Phone:  (512) 463-0698
Fax:  (512) 463-5109
1)  Adds "or recklessly" which eliminates "intent."
2)  Changes "Animal" to a domesticated or wild living creature.
3)  Leaves intact the existing exception for fishing, hunting or trapping.

Mailing Address for all House Committee members:
The Honorable ________
PO Box 2910
Austin, TX 78768

Chair:  Representative Rick Hardcastle
Rick.hardcastle@house.state.tx.us
Ph:  (512) 463-0526
Fax:  (512) 463-6003

Vice-Chair:  Representative Charles "Doc" Anderson
doc.anderson@house.state.tx.us
(512) 463-0135
Fax:  (512) 463-0642

Representative Betty Brown
Betty.brown@house.state.tx.us
Ph:  (512) 463-0458
Fax:  (512) 463-2040

Representative Lon Burnam
Lon.burnam@house.state.tx.us
Ph:  (512) 463-0740
Fax:  (512) 463-1075

Representative Jessica Farrar
Jessica.farrar@house.state.tx.us
Ph:  (512) 463-0620
Fax:  (512) 463-0894

Representative Abel Herrero
Abel.herrero@house.state.tx.us
Ph:  (512) 463-0462
Fax:  (512) 463-1705

Representative Dora Olivo
Dora.olivo@house.state.tx.us
Ph:  (512) 463-0494
Fax:  (512) 463-1403


SENATE COMPANION BILL
(identical to HB 326)
SB 172 is in the Criminal Justice Committee
Author:  Senator Chris Harris
Chris.harris@senate.state.tx.us
Ph:  (512) 463-0109
Fax:  (512) 463-7003

Mailing address for all Senate Committee members:
PO Box 12068
Capitol Station
Austin, TX 78711

Clerk:  Carley Rose, Ph: (512) 463-0345

(Senate)  Criminal Justice Committee members:
Chair:  Senator John Whitmire
John.whitmire@senate.state.tx.us
Ph:  (512) 463-0115
Fax:  (512) 475-3737

Vice-Chair:  Senator Kel Seliger
Kel.seliger@senate.state.tx.us
Ph:  (512) 463-0131
Fax:  (512) 475-3733

Senator John Carona
John.carona@senate.state.tx.us
Ph:  (512) 463-0116
Fax:  (512) 463-3135

Senator Rodney Ellis
Rodney.ellis@senate.state.tx.us
Ph:  (512) 463-0113
Fax:  (512) 463-0006

Senator Juan Hinojosa
Juan.hinojosa@senate.state.tx.us
Ph:  (512) 463-0120
Fax:  (512) 463-0229

Senator Steve Ogden
Steve.ogden@senate.state.tx.us
Ph:  (512) 463-0105
Fax:  (512) 463-5713

Senator Tommy Williams
Tommy.Williams@senate.state.tx.us
Ph:  (512) 463-0104
Fax:  (512) 463-6373


 
How about this, what will the SPCA or PETA will say about this? Caliente,CA. 4 chimpanzees broke out of their cage at an animal sanctuary ( animal haven ranch) and attacked two visitors. One visitor is in critical condition and the other is in serious condition one of the injured had most of his face chewed off. Two of the chimps were shot and killed by  animal ranch haven employees. the other two were recaptured. I guess this is how you save an animal's life, at the expense of humans? How will SPCA and PETA justify this????? (source the associated press)   
 
Howard W.
 
 
If Left Up To The AR Do You Think,
All Chimps And Gamefowl In Captivity Would Be Rescued To Be Euthanized
Or Liberated To Their Death In The Wild
 
 
 
Mauled man tried to 'reason' with attacking chimps


SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — A man who was severely mauled by two chimpanzees at an animal sanctuary last week was quickly overwhelmed when the apes attacked, his wife said today.

“One was at his head, one was at his foot. But all that time ... he was trying to reason with them,” a sobbing LaDonna Davis told ABC’s “Good Morning America.” “I couldn’t do anything.”

Davis, 64, and her husband, St. James Davis, were visiting Animal Haven Ranch near Bakersfield on Thursday when two male chimps escaped their enclosure and attacked the couple.

“When we made eye contact, the charge was on,” LaDonna Davis said. “There was no stopping anything, and the big chimp came around from behind me and pushed me into my husband. The male came around from behind and chomped off my thumb. ... My husband must have realized we were in deep trouble because he pushed me backward. At that time, they both went for him.”

St. James Davis, 62, lost all the fingers from both hands, an eye, part of his nose, cheek, lips and part of his buttocks in the ferocious attack, his wife said over the weekend on NBC’s “Today Show.” She also said one of his feet was mutilated. A Kern County Sheriff’s commander also said his genitals were mauled.

The Davises were visiting the sanctuary to celebrate the birthday of Moe — a 39-year-old chimpanzee who was taken from their home in West Covina, a Los Angeles suburb, after biting off part of a woman’s finger in 1999.

 
Source: http://www.qctimes.com/internal.php?story_id=1046820&l=1&t=Nation+/+World&c=26,1046820

 

 
OUT OF THE SB-382 FILED BY SEN. ENSIGN ALMOST A THIRD  OF THE CO-SIGNERS ARE MULT-IMILLIONARS. SEN KOHL LEADS THE PACK WITH 300 MEGABUCKS. SEN. FIENSTEIN IS WAY BACK THERE WITH ONLY 50 MIL AND OUR BOY SEN. TED KENNEDY IS CLOSE BEHIND WITH 35MIL. SEN DAYTON HAS 20 MIL AND THE  LAST OF THE  BUNCH SEN. DEWINE ONLY HAS 3.5 MIL.  NOW I KNOW THAT THESE PEOPLE ARE REALLY IN TOUCH WITH THE LOCAL FOLK. AND I GUESS THAT THE REST OF THE CO-SIGNERS ARE JUST WAITING ON THEIR PAC MONEY FROM THE AR? IF THESE SENATORS ARE SO WORRIED ABOUT ANIMAL CRUELTY WHY DON'T THEY GIVE UP A FEW OF THEIR BUCKS!!!!!!!!
 
H. W.
 
 
S.382
Title: A bill to amend title 18, United States Code, to strengthen prohibitions against animal fighting, and for other purposes.
Sponsor: Sen Ensign, John [NV] (introduced 2/15/2005)      Cosponsors (18)
Related Bills: H.R.817
http://thomas.loc.gov/