
Yet for the last five years Mrs Hudson, a 67-year-old widow, has attracted the attention of an international animal rights campaign. Her name, address and phone number are posted on a Florida-based activists' website, identifying her as a legitimate target in the fight to close a controversial guinea pig farm owned by the Hall family in Newchurch, Staffordshire.
Mrs Hudson is no vivisector, animal farmer or laboratory technician. She is simply the Hall family's cleaning lady. But in the highly charged atmosphere that has pervaded the campaign to shut Darley Oaks Farm since the Animal Liberation Front filmed guinea pigs in overcrowded conditions there six years ago, she is seen by some as a collaborator.
Bricks have been thrown through her windows, incendiary devices left outside her house, and a lifesize rag doll, with a noose round its neck, a knife in its chest and a note on its body saying: "This is me next," has been deposited at her front door.
It is only in the last few days that Mrs Hudson has finally succumbed to the pressure and left her job after activists turned their attention to her children and grandchildren. Three vehicles owned by her children were sprayed with paint stripper, causing thousands of pounds of damage. Her daughter Jayne also received a letter which warned: "If your mother doesn't quit within one week we can't be responsible for what is going to happen to you - so can you please display these yellow cards in the bedroom where your children sleep."
So Mrs Hudson resigned from her £100 a week job last week. At first she contemplated remaining silent, but after her first seven days of unemployment, she said she was filled with anger about what had happened.
"I have always stuck it out, I always just thought: 'I am not going to bow down to you'," she told the Guardian.
Farmhouse
"I have never even been in the guinea pig huts, I just clean the farmhouse. But then it started happening to my family, and each time a car is done it costs £3,000 to respray. They can't afford that, so I felt I had to leave. But I keep thinking; 'Why should I have to lose my job?' It got me out of the house since my husband died and it gave me a bit of pocket money. I liked it."
Across the fields to the west and east of Mrs Hudson's house, others have been through similar experiences in what has become a war pitching animal rights extremists against a family who breed guinea pigs for medical research, and anyone in the wider community who dares to associate with them.
Two pubs have barred the Halls after they were targeted and the greens at the Branston Golf and Country Club, where John Hall was a member, were dug up and daubed with the letters ALF.
Next week Mr Justice Owen, in the high court, will rule whether the intimidation requires an injunction barring named activists from a 27- square mile zone around seven parishes. Members of Save the Newchurch Guinea Pig campaign, who are already restricted by an injunction to protesting once a week, say this a draconian step too far.
Melanie Abbott, 27, said no one in her organisation condoned direct action of the type suffered by Mrs Hudson. "The main effects on the wider community are being caused by the illegal activities of people who are nothing to do with our campaign," she said.
For Mrs Hudson, whatever happens in the high court next week is too late. With plenty of time on her hands, she can only dwell on what she has been through.
"The first time they came with bricks, it was the early hours of the morning. My husband was very ill with cancer and was sleeping in our room alone. I was in the spare room and I heard this almighty crash. I ran into him and the whole window had been smashed, the brick landed on his pillow, just inches from his head, there was glass all over the pillow. If he had moved his neck an inch he would have been stabbed with glass."
Two weeks later the visitors returned, hurling more bricks through her glass front door and windows, one into the basket where her dog Ellie was sleeping.
"Two months after my husband died they came back. The brick came through the window and hit me on the shoulder. I had an almighty bruise," she said. "Even now I still lie in bed sometimes wondering: 'Are they going to come tonight'."
More recently, Staffordshire police, who routinely intercept mail across the whole community, received a letter warning Mrs Hudson that her late husband's body would be dug up unless she abandoned her cleaning job. "The police asked if I wanted to see the letter, but I said no, it would upset me too much. I just think it's a wicked thing to do."
The threat was taken more seriously because it came in the months after the body of Christopher Hall's mother in law was stolen from a graveyard in nearby Yoxhall. "We were all still coming to terms with my dad's death and then we have the stress of this," said Jayne Birtles, Mrs Hudson's daughter. "We have a camera over my dad's grave now. Can you believe it?"
Few in the villages to the west of Burton upon Trent will talk so openly when the subject of the Newchurch guinea pigs is raised. "People are just too scared to say anything in case they are next," said Gordon Sealey, the vicar of Hoar Cross. "There seem to be two groups, the ones that demonstrate peacefully outside the farm and others who come at night. The question is, who is actually fronting this thing?"
Violence
Of the 17 names of individuals and groups mentioned in the high court application, some are known activists.
They include John Curtin, a veteran protester, who endorses violent direct action and was jailed for digging up the grave of the Duke of Beaufort, and Mel Broughton, another committed anti vivisectionist, who was sentenced to four years for conspiracy to cause explosions.
Janet Tomlinson, 62, is accused of "stalking" the Halls with the frequency of her protests. Born and bred in Burton, Ms Tomlinson has much in common with Mrs Hudson. In her 60s, she also lives alone and has been touched by cancer, having been diagnosed with a malignant breast tumour last year.
But Ms Tomlinson said she had no sympathy for the cleaning lady. Although she denied any involvement in direct action, she blamed the police and Tony Blair for forcing legitimate protesters to adopt more extreme tactics. "The police have prevented lawful protest and forced people to take other actions. It's like the suffragettes when they used to lobby MPs at the Commons and then follow them home and smash their windows. It's like any pressure group - first you are ignored, then you are ridiculed, then you are bullied and then you win."
With her fellow protesters she pledges to be outside Darley Oaks farm tomorrow and every week until the day it closes down. Mrs Hudson will be at home, scanning the pages of the local press looking for a new job.
Six years of threats and fear
1999
September
Animal Liberation Front raids huts at Darley Oaks farm,
Newchurch, and "liberates" 600 animals. ALF video purports to show dead and
dying animals
November
Save the Newchurch Guinea Pigs group forms, calling on
the public to "help us close down the death camp"
2000
August
Michael Fabricant, local MP, calls for extra police
protection for the farm's joint owner Christopher Hall and his family after they
receive death threats
2003
April
Two overhead power cables sawn down causing £4,500 damage
June
Animal rights protesters invade Branston golf and country
club, where John Hall, joint owner of Darley Oaks, is a member
August
Campaign spreads to subcontractors and suppliers of the
farm. Dove Fuels in Staffordshire visited by protesters
October
A hoax incendiary device is left outside the Halls' farm
2004
February
Electricity cables sawn through in Newchurch
September
Shotgun cartridges spelling his name left outside the
home of Simon Turner, a delivery driver for the Halls
October
The body of Christopher Hall's mother in law is stolen
from its grave at Yoxhall parish church
December
Temporary injunction bans protesters from going within
100 metres of the farm for the purpose of limited peaceful protests
2005
January
May Hudson, the Halls' cleaner, resigns after harassment.
Lawyers for the Halls apply for a 27 square mile exclusion zone around seven
parishes
· What did you think of this article?
Mail your responses to life@guardian.co.uk and include your name and
address
Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/life/news/story/0,12976,1396346,00.html
ANIMAL RIGHTS FANATICS TARGET MINISTERS' HOMES
|
Jan 22 2005 | |
|
Police alert on net 'hate call' | |
|
By Jeff Edwards Chief Crime Correspondent Exclusive | |
A HATE-campaign against Government ministers is being whipped up by animal rights extremists.
Home Secretary Charles Clarke and Trade Secretary Patricia Hewitt are among those whose houses and families may be at risk.
Special Branch is investigating an internet website, believed to be the work of the Animal Liberation Front, which has published home addresses of the two Cabinet figures and 11 junior ministers. The site - under the name of Badgers Unknown Anarchist Ventures - urges followers: "Never do anything to an animal abuser they wouldn't do to an animal."
Police warn of windows being stoned, graffiti daubing, acid sprayed on cars and large fireworks thrown in gutters and gardens.
A senior Scotland Yard source said: "We think it could become vicious."
The list also has details of Oxford University Chancellor Chris Patten, its High Steward and nearly 40 academics.
An £18million animal research base planned at Oxford has triggered the anger, police believe
It was originally going to be at Cambridge but plans were abandoned after extremist threats.
LEADING animal rights activist Heather Nicholson has vowed not to give up her fight, despite being banned from going near research centres in Cambridgeshire.
Nicholson was given a five- year anti-social behaviour order (ASBO) preventing her from going within 500m of Phytopharm in Godmanchester and Huntingdon Life Sciences in Alconbury.
Peterborough Magistrates' Court handed down the order after Nicholson, who also uses the surnames Avery, Barwick and James, was convicted of common assault and aggravated trespass relating to an incident at Phytopharm in West Street, Godmanchester.
<snip>
Source: http://w3.cambridge-news.co.uk/news/regional/story.asp?StoryID=67982
Huntingdon animal activists face
terrorism charges in US
ANIMAL rights activists face trial on terrorism charges in America next month for their campaign against a British research centre.
The seven members of Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty (Shac) are all from America, but at least one trained as an activist in Britain.
They were arrested in FBI raids across four states over their alleged activities against Huntingdon Life Sciences. The company’s headquarters are in Cambridgeshire, but it has a laboratory in New Jersey.
The seven, who face trial in New Jersey, are charged with conspiring to commit animal enterprise terrorism. If convicted they face heavy fines and up to three years each in jail.
Their alleged activities are little different from those undertaken by some British extremists. They are accused of posting terror tactics on the internet, inciting others to commit vandalism and physical assaults, to send threatening letters, make abusive phone calls, e-mail “bombs” to crash computers and invade homes.
They allegedly organised regular protests outside the HLS laboratory, one of which led to violent clashes with police. The indictment lists recent action taken against Huntingdon’s American staff, clients and associated companies. This included smoke-bomb attacks, the overturning of an employee’s car, the carving of the words “puppy killer” into a golf course where an executive played, and publishing on the internet the personal contact details of staff.
The defendants are not accused of committing the crimes but of using the internet to incite others.
Federal prosecutors described their activities as “thuggery and intimidation” and said that they “crossed the line from civil demonstration to domestic terrorism”. American police say that there has been “a surge in crimes by militant activists fighting to stop product testing on animals”.
The seven have been named as Darius Fullmer, 27, a paramedic, and John McGee, 25, both from New Jersey; Kevin Kjonaas, 26, Lauren Gazzola, 25, and Jacob Conroy, 28, all from Pinole, California; Joshua Harper, 29, from Seattle; and Andrew Stepanian, 25, from New York.
Mr Kjonaas, the president of ShacUSA, lived in Britain for two years, taking command of the British arm of Shac while its founders served jail sentences in 2002. In an interview with an internet magazine, “Kevin Jonas” said: “I spent a year in England working full-time on animal rights campaigns and there really cut my teeth on some ‘true grit’ activism. I helped to shut down two of London’s last few fur stores (including the furrier to the Queen), plus saw the closure of Shamrock Monkey Farm and Regal Rabbits. It was a ‘smashing’ time to be there.” Shac, which formed in 1999 with the aim of closing down Britain’s biggest animal-testing laboratory, has branches in the United States, Germany, Italy, Portugal and Switzerland.
Source: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-1450619,00.html
| Press Release | Source: Center for Consumer Freedom |
PETA President to Get a Taste of Her Own
Medicine
Friday January 21, 4:27 pm
ET
Consumer Group Protests Ingrid Newkirk's Washington Book-Signing, Blames PETA for Bankrolling "Unkind" Arsonists
Date: Monday, January 24
Time: 6:00 pm
Place: Borders Bookstore
1801 K Street, NW
A CCF spokesperson will be on-hand with leaflets detailing PETA's shameful history and tactics, and a list of Ingrid Newkirk's most controversial quotables. Meanwhile, other CCF advocates will appear dressed in the all-black garb of the PETA-funded Earth Liberation Front (ELF), a group of arsonists and violent saboteurs describes by the FBI as a "domestic terror organization." In 2001 PETA made a large cash contribution to the ELF, the only such donation ever publicly acknowledged.
"Ingrid Newkirk would love to rehabilitate her group's image by promoting tofu with a smile on her face," said CCF Director of Research David Martosko. "But PETA's own history shows that its idea of 'kindness' includes arson and other violent crimes."
In a 2002 animal-rights convention speech, Newkirk described PETA's overall goal as "total animal liberation." At the same event one year earlier, PETA vegetarian campaign director Bruce Friedrich endorsed "blowing stuff up and smashing windows" as "a great way to bring about animal liberation." Friedrich added that "it would be great if all the fast-food outlets, slaughterhouses, these laboratories, and the banks who fund them exploded tomorrow ... Hallelujah to the people who are willing to do it."
PETA's own literature includes a leaflet describing the terrorist Animal Liberation Front (ALF) as "An Army of the Kind." The ALF has been responsible for over $100 million in arson damage, including a Michigan State University research laboratory fire in which Newkirk herself was implicated by a federal prosecutor.
"Americans shouldn't be fooled into thinking that PETA is warm and fuzzy," added Martosko. "It's a band of radicals intent on abolishing meat, milk, cheese, circuses, zoos, wool, leather, hunting, fishing, and the very medical research that will bring us a cure for AIDS. Even if you agree with this lunacy, PETA's so-called 'kind' choices shouldn't include bankrolling arsonists."
The Center for Consumer Freedom is a nonprofit coalition supported by restaurants, food companies, and consumers, working together to promote personal responsibility and protect consumer choices.
Source: Center for Consumer Freedom
Source: http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/050121/dcf040_1.html
.......The same folks that brought you the Endangered Species Act, spotted owls, wolves, Wilderness; the ones that manage the hunting and fishing excise taxes; and the ones who are working with UN bureaucrats to bring you Invasive Species and Native Ecosystems and gun control: are now gearing up to bring all the fish and wildlife agencies under the Federal umbrella and direct the shutdown of hunting and fishing from Washington.......
ACCOUNTABILITY & AGENDAS
The most vicious comments I receive come from animal rights and
environmental advocates. The most hateful comments I receive come from
bureaucrats, former bureaucrats, and wildlife professionals working as lobbyists
and staffers for corporations and national conservation organizations. Nothing
so agitates the latter as when I write about the abuse and mismanagement of the
one-half to three-quarters of a Billion dollars in excise taxes collected
annually for State fish and wildlife agencies to restore sport fish and
wildlife. That is the subject of this piece.
Six years ago I helped to
expose the theft of $45 to $60 Million of these excise taxes in a two-year
period by top managers of the US Fish and Wildlife Service from funds due the
State fish and wildlife agencies. The Federal bureaucrats used the funds to
“reintroduce” wolves in the Upper Rockies (something Congress had refused to
fund), to open a California Office to emphasize endangered species (another
thing Congress had refused to fund), and to pay bonuses and awards to
cooperative Federal employees. The State fish and wildlife agencies never
complained about the theft of their funds, the funds were never replaced, and NO
ONE WAS EVER PUNISHED. This demonstration of no accountability was not lost on
the “professional” and still-present top managers of the US Fish and Wildlife
Service. As with a child that goes unpunished for stealing from classmates, soon
enough he graduates to the big time and everyone is asking, “how did he ever
come to do that”?
The recently completed year of 2004 is another step in
the ratcheting up of the increasing magnitude of those scandals concerning the
mismanagement of these funds and the conspiracy to cover it up because of the
hidden agendas that make a wide range of non-bureaucrats into cooperators.
In 2004:
1.) Approximately $70 Million ($40M from arms
manufacturers, $20M from fishing tackle manufacturers, and $10M from archery
manufacturers) due to be paid on the products manufactured was NOT PAID by the
manufacturers.
2.) Approximately $40 Million was “lost” by IRS
bookkeeping due to the small amounts collected individually and the accounting
deficiencies that make tracking difficult.
3.) Approximately $30 Million
was lost because investments of the funds (the responsibility of the US Fish and
Wildlife Service) between receipt of the funds and disbursement to the States
were mismanaged. The previous year $40 Million was so returned from investing,
this year (when the investment outlook was even brighter) only $10 Million was
returned on investments.
4.) The above items total at least $140 Million
lost from State fish and wildlife agencies in one year alone.
5.) The
fishing tackle manufacturers quietly lobbied (and were successful) to have the
excise tax on fishing tackle boxes reduced by more than half. This lost another
$5 Million in annual excise tax collections.
6.) The archery
manufacturers quietly lobbied (and were likewise successful) to take the excise
tax off bows under 30 lbs. pull and certain arrows. This reduced excise tax
collections another $3 to $4 Million.
7.) The manufacturers are seeking
to employ retired IRS auditors and former Congressional tax experts to protect
the current underpayments and protect recent reductions of excise taxes and to
explore further reduction possibilities. Additionally they are working with the
Federal bureaucracies and the State agencies to politically undermine a
Congressional inquiry into the fact that the States have been and are continuing
to go unaudited by the US Fish and Wildlife Service as required by law.
According to law, each State must be audited every five years. It has been over
a decade since a complete audit cycle of the State agencies has been completed
and no audits are currently being conducted. These “professionals”, lobbyists,
and bureaucrats have even openly discussed “finding out” who is “paying” me to
cause so much trouble as in writing this article. (NOTE: Guys, if you find out,
please let me know because “they” haven’t been paying their bills!)
8.)
The US Fish and Wildlife Service manager responsible for investing the excise
taxes, and therefore “accountable” for the +$30 Million dollar loss received
$14,500 in “achievement” awards in this one year alone.
9.) The US Fish
and Wildlife Service employee responsible for finding and pursuing the annual
loss of these Millions was forced to retire this year without any recognition.
Indeed the clear message to all other employees (as with my forced retirement)
was that those who do not cooperate in WHATEVER the top managers want will be
dealt with severely. Already since his departure, tax collectors are losing
interest in pursuing the bookkeeping problems and the manufacturers and
lobbyists are emboldened to silently pursue their own self-interests.
10.) The lobbyists, bureaucrats, and “professionals’ are currently
planning a quiet political campaign to increase the amount of the excise taxes
kept in Washington for “administration” (reducing the amount available to State
fish and wildlife agencies by the same amount). This will both increase the
amount of play money (the current amount kept in Washington for “administration”
is easily twice what any business would spend) available to Federal bureaucrats;
it will also increase the amount available for administrative “grants” awarded
by Washington bureaucrats and lobbyists to favored recipients and themselves.
Why doesn’t anyone pick up on this? Where are our “Unlimiteds” and
“Foundations”? Truth be known, they are supporting the extermination of western
brown and rainbow trout to be replaced by the far less productive fishery for
“endangered” bull trout. They are chirping echoes of wolf “benefits” ground out
by bureaucrats, environmentalists, and animal rights extremists as elk herds and
elk licenses and elk hunting disappear. They are “coming together” to advise
“partnerships” and “cooperation” with the Sierra Club (and all their ilk) – the
very groups committed to eradicating hunting and fishing.
Where are the
outdoor magazines? I appreciate ballistic advice and a good perch recipe as much
as the next guy but what about the lifeblood of our activities? Where are the
Outdoor stores’ “professionals” that festoon their store walls with US Fish and
Wildlife Service decals and Invasive Species like pheasants and chukars and
brown trout yet remain silent as Federal Invasive Species laws are proposed with
State fish and wildlife agency support?
Where are our state fish and
wildlife agencies and their lobbyists? As hunters, fishermen, and State
politicians hear nothing except how the State fish and wildlife agency can’t
afford to do this or that and how much things cost (mostly self-imposed tasks
and roles) and how if they don’t get more money they will go broke; why isn’t
there a peep about losing $140 plus Million last year alone? Why isn’t the
former State fish and wildlife Director that is now US Fish and Wildlife Service
Director excited about more than “listing Colorado butterflies”?
The
answer to these questions is a hidden agenda. Outdoor writers, State
bureaucrats, and fish and wildlife “professionals” are convinced hunting and
fishing (their current gravy train) are on their way out. Long story short –
they have all swung behind a 20+ year-old scheme to have the US Congress give
Billions to the US Fish and Wildlife Service who in turn will “give” it to State
fish and wildlife agencies for “conservation”. As you might guess “conservation”
means whatever you want it to mean from introducing wolves, to buying or easing
private property, to propagandizing children, etc. The supporters of this raid
on the Federal Treasury aren’t willing to pay their own way like hunters and
fishermen; no, they strive to use the taxes from all of us to eradicate hunting
and fishing and grow the central government power over all of us in a dramatic
fashion. This scheme began as a tax on wildlife recreation goods (failed) and
then morphed into a “Chickadee checkoff” on tax forms (failed) and then became
CARA (diversion of offshore energy taxes to States that also failed) and most
recently was reconfigured as a Get Outdoors diversion of Billions to States that
also failed. Because the money is to go through US Fish and Wildlife Service to
States “just like the hunting and fishing excise taxes” the outdoors writers,
the States, and all the “professionals” circle the wagons when someone like me
looks under the covers. I assume I do not have to explain why the Federal
bureaucrats and most Federal politicians do not want these abuses of the
management of the excise taxes exposed.
It may however, be too late to
stop the shift of putting State fish and wildlife agencies on REAL Federal
Appropriated funding (and therefore MORE accountable to Federal overseers than
the government and people of their own State). Congress has quietly and with the
cooperation of the bureaucrats and “professionals” initiated two new grant
programs for Congressionally Appropriated funds to be, (“laundered?”) excuse me,
administered through the same office in the US Fish and Wildlife Service that
administers the hunting and fishing excise taxes.
Last year the State
and Tribal Wildlife Grant Program disbursed $76Million for “conservation”. To
say that the funds can be used for every conceivable governmental mischief would
be an understatement. If there were any “real” (beyond budgets and power) need
for such work, States or private groups would come up with it like hunters and
fishermen have done for over half a century. As it is, unlike the requirement in
the hunting and fishing excise taxes, there is not even a simple requirement for
public access to projects funded by our Federal tax dollars.
Also last
year, the Landowner Incentive Program (another new Congressionally Appropriated
funding stream to State agencies through the US Fish and Wildlife Service)
disbursed $30 Million for the same amorphous “conservation” projects that anyone
who has followed fish and wildlife programs of the last decade will instantly
recognize. The simple requirement for public access is likewise conspicuous in
its’ absence.
The camel’s nose is under the tent. In fact what the
environmentalists and animal rights activists and wildlife professionals and
Federal bureaucrats and certain Federal politicians have wanted all along (the
“breaking” of State fish and wildlife programs and the control of all fish,
wildlife, and plant activities from Washington) has begun. The same folks that
brought you the Endangered Species Act, spotted owls, wolves, Wilderness; the
ones that manage the hunting and fishing excise taxes; and the ones who are
working with UN bureaucrats to bring you Invasive Species and Native Ecosystems
and gun control: are now gearing up to bring all the fish and wildlife agencies
under the Federal umbrella and direct the shutdown of hunting and fishing from
Washington.
So all you “professionals” and bureaucrats save your bile
for someone who cares. I already know that you are not going to buy my lunch or
offer me a contract. I simply think it is disgusting what is going on and I hope
someone that reads this can do something about it.
Jim Beers
23
January 2004
If you found this worthwhile, please share it with others.
Thanks.
This article and other recent articles by Jim Beers can be found
at
http://www.allianceforamerica.org/bb/viewforum.php?f=91
Jim Beers is available for consulting or to speak. Contact:
JimBeers7@earthlink.net
Source: http://www.allianceforamerica.org/bb/viewtopic.php?t=2628&sid=87e832393c7009e993592127d71d0633