S.382
Title: A bill to amend title 18, United States Code, to strengthen prohibitions against animal fighting, and for other purposes.
Sponsor: Sen Ensign, John [NV] (introduced 2/15/2005)      Cosponsors (18)
Latest Major Action: 2/15/2005 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
 
COSPONSORS(18), BY DATE [order is left to right]:    

Sen Specter, Arlen [PA] - 2/15/2005 Sen Cantwell, Maria [WA] - 2/15/2005
Sen Feinstein, Dianne [CA] - 2/15/2005 Sen DeWine, Mike [OH] - 2/15/2005
Sen Kennedy, Edward M. [MA] - 2/15/2005 Sen Kyl, Jon [AZ] - 2/15/2005
Sen Kohl, Herb [WI] - 2/15/2005 Sen Lugar, Richard G. [IN] - 2/15/2005
Sen Vitter, David [LA] - 2/15/2005 Sen Leahy, Patrick J. [VT] - 2/15/2005
Sen Santorum, Rick [PA] - 2/15/2005 Sen Durbin, Richard [IL] - 2/17/2005
Sen Collins, Susan M. [ME] - 2/17/2005 Sen Johnson, Tim [SD] - 2/28/2005
Sen Lautenberg, Frank R. [NJ] - 2/28/2005 Sen Hagel, Chuck [NE] - 3/1/2005
Sen Dayton, Mark [MN] - 3/1/2005 Sen Feingold, Russell D. [WI] - 3/2/2005

 
H.R.817
Title: To amend title 18, United States Code, to strengthen prohibitions against animal fighting, and for other purposes.
Sponsor: Rep Green, Mark [WI-8] (introduced 2/15/2005)      Cosponsors (37)
Latest Major Action: 2/15/2005 Referred to House committee. Status: Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
 
COSPONSORS(37), BY DATE [order is left to right]:    

Rep Bartlett, Roscoe G. [MD-6] - 2/15/2005 Rep Chabot, Steve [OH-1] - 2/15/2005
Rep Chocola, Chris [IN-2] - 2/15/2005 Rep Gallegly, Elton [CA-24] - 2/15/2005
Rep Blumenauer, Earl [OR-3] - 2/15/2005 Rep Andrews, Robert E. [NJ-1] - 2/15/2005
Rep Conyers, John, Jr. [MI-14] - 2/15/2005 Rep Scott, Robert C. [VA-3] - 2/15/2005
Rep Peterson, Collin C. [MN-7] - 2/15/2005 Rep Kolbe, Jim [AZ-8] - 2/15/2005
Rep Moran, James P. [VA-8] - 2/15/2005 Rep Bass, Charles F. [NH-2] - 2/15/2005
Rep Sanders, Bernard [VT] - 2/15/2005 Rep Kelly, Sue W. [NY-19] - 2/15/2005
Rep Owens, Major R. [NY-11] - 2/15/2005 Rep Platts, Todd Russell [PA-19] - 2/15/2005
Rep McNulty, Michael R. [NY-21] - 2/15/2005 Rep Johnson, Nancy L. [CT-5] - 2/15/2005
Rep Sabo, Martin Olav [MN-5] - 2/15/2005 Rep Payne, Donald M. [NJ-10] - 2/15/2005
Rep Honda, Michael M. [CA-15] - 2/15/2005 Rep Berman, Howard L. [CA-28] - 2/15/2005
Rep McDermott, Jim [WA-7] - 2/15/2005 Rep Harman, Jane [CA-36] - 2/15/2005
Rep Slaughter, Louise McIntosh [NY-28] - 2/15/2005 Rep Van Hollen, Chris [MD-8] - 2/15/2005
Rep Woolsey, Lynn C. [CA-6] - 2/15/2005 Rep Petri, Thomas E. [WI-6] - 2/17/2005
Rep Clay, Wm. Lacy [MO-1] - 2/17/2005 Rep DeGette, Diana [CO-1] - 3/2/2005
Rep Inslee, Jay [WA-1] - 3/2/2005 Rep Crowley, Joseph [NY-7] - 3/2/2005
Rep Rothman, Steven R. [NJ-9] - 3/2/2005 Rep Frelinghuysen, Rodney P. [NJ-11] - 3/2/2005
Rep Pascrell, Bill, Jr. [NJ-8] - 3/2/2005 Rep Moore, Dennis [KS-3] - 3/2/2005
Rep Nadler, Jerrold [NY-8] - 3/2/2005

Source: http://thomas.loc.gov/
 
 

Could We Call This One Stike For Humans? 

Indiana SB 562

Killing domestic animals. Makes murdering a domestic animal a nonsuspendible Class D felony unless the killing was necessary to prevent injury to a person, protect property, or prevent a seriously injured domestic animal from prolonged suffering. As used in this section, "domestic animal" means a member of the:
        (1) bovine;
        (2) equine;
        (3) ovine;
        (4) caprine;
        (5) porcine;
        (6) canine; or
        (7) feline;
species that is not wild.

Link for more info:

http://www.in.gov/apps/lsa/session/billwatch/billinfo?year=2005&session=1&request=getBill&docno=562#latest_info

Courtesy: Marc R.

.......I don’t believe it is up to the legislators to be dictating what goes on in the counties......
 
From Carlsbad Current-Argus

Local News
Majority of local legislators against ban
By Jason P. Montoya/Current-Argus Staff Writer
Mar 3, 2005, 02:48 am

CARLSBAD — If a ban on cockfighting in New Mexico were left up to local state legislators, the ban would fail in a 3-1 vote.

House Bill 878 — which would make participating in cockfighting for monetary gain or entertainment a fourth-degree felony — was passed by the House Tuesday in a 50-15 vote.

Local representatives John Heaton, D-Carlsbad, and Joe Stell, R-Carlsbad, voted on opposite sides of the issue. Heaton voted for the ban, while Stell voted against it.

“I just think it is a brutal sport,” Heaton said. “I think it sends the wrong message to children and society — that we believe it’s OK to pit one animal against another in a fight to the death. It’s a brutal, blood-letting sport. I think it teaches violence, and that’s the wrong thing to teach.”

Stell said he is probably personally opposed to cockfighting but he believes the issue should be left for individual counties to decide.

“I thought that the county — our local people — should have acted first,” he said. “It is within state statute to allow counties to ban the sport. Our county has not made that decision, and they have been aware of cockfighting. There must be reasons why they haven’t acted. I hate for the state to overrule the counties.”

Stell added that he would hate to see people involved in cockfighting turned into criminals because of a ban.

“You’re making a felon out of anyone that fights with those chickens,” he said. “I don’t believe they are criminals and hate to see them made into criminals.”

Neither representative said he believed the bill would make it through the Senate.

The bill now sits in the hands of the Senate Conservation Committee, which tabled a similar Senate bill in a 5-2 vote last week, effectively killing it.

Sen. Vernon Asbill, R-Carlsbad, said he would vote against a ban on cockfighting if the bill reached the Senate floor.

“I really feel this is a local issue,” he said. “I feel if a community doesn’t want it, then they need to go to the city council or county commission. I don’t believe it is up to the legislators to be dictating what goes on in the counties.”

Asbill said he has attended one cockfighting event but doesn’t have a strong personal opinion on the issue.

“I don’t have a big feeling on it one way or another,” he said.

Sen. Carroll Leavell, R-Jal, expressed similar sentiments about the state’s role in banning the sport.

“I have never been to a cockfight and never intend to go, but I support the counties’ right to make the decision, rather than having the state dictate to the counties what they should do,” he said.

“This is something that there is strong support on both sides of the issue. In Lea and Eddy counties, there is probably some of the strongest support for cockfighting in the state, and I am here to represent my constituency,” he said. “As such, I have resisted, and continue to resist, any movement to outlaw the sport.”


Philippines Approves Online Cockfight Betting System

PHILIPPINES – As reported by the Philippine Star: "The state-owned Philippine Amusement and Gaming Corp. (Pagcor) has approved the implementation of the country's first Internet-based cockfight betting system.

"Dubbed TeleSabong, it is the latest online betting game offered by Pagcor and listed Internet gaming company Philweb Corp.

"The implementation of Telesabong, according to Pagcor vice-president Rene Figueroa, is intended to maximize the revenue generating potential of its Internet service operation with Philweb as technical and marketing consultant.

"The online betting formats follow the traditional cockfighting formats such as Singles, Parlays, and Pick the Derby Champion.

"….TeleSabong is an online betting system where the game results are based on an outcome or series of outcome of a four-cock-derby…"

Source: http://www.rgtonline.com/Article.cfm?ArticleId=55191&CategoryName=Gaming%20Life