ANIMAL HUSBANDRY RELEASE
 
March 11th will come and go similar to the other court dates that have been continued in regards to the six felony arrests at Hill Top Cultural Center. At present I don't know when the next date will be set. Our attorneys have prepared a Brief that cites so much case law that it wouldn't surprise me if the DA and the State have to hire outside Counsel to help them in court.
 
The DA is a master at begging for and getting continuances. This will be his last one. Again I have been sworn to secrecy on the case and what it entails. All I will say and I've said it before. The State of Oklahoma is about to open up a huge can of worms that deals with Geo-political Boundaries and Jurisdiction and a court battle they cannot win. I realize there are a lot of you waiting on the outcome. Please be patient. We are laying a lot of groundwork making a solid foundation if we go to Federal Court. As I have stated before. WE WILL WIN. This is the good news.
 
Now for the bad. SB-382 and companion bill HR-817 that was introduced in Washington DC DOES NOT include any language that includes Tribal Lands. If you will recall the legislation that was introduced last session included Tribal Lands. If you will recall I put it in print that as long as the bills last session did include Tribal Lands the bills would not pass. THEY DIDN'T. The animal rights idiots fell right in our trap by reading the Gamefowl News and all the talk about the Kiowa Connection and what it could do for our Industry. This session unfortunately, they are not as stupid. I predict before this session ends SB-382 and its companion bill will pass. The animal rights idiots will have their way getting the felony provisions passed regarding paraphernalia but I have my doubts about the felony for crossing state lines with intent to fight. Only time will tell.
 
Starting 2 1/2 years ago there was someone in 23 States that took the time to form associations that would be able to sign compacts with Mike Turner and the Kiowa Association. This was done so that the State could cite the Grandfather Clause if needed. It's a shame that the other 27 States set on the sidelines and didn't act.
 
 
 
Animal Husbandry Commission
National Director
Bobby Jones
BDJones23@aol.com
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 

Oppose HR 817 and S 382

 
Summary:  HR 817 and S 382 are bills heavily supported and lobbied by the Humane Society of United States (HSUS) which would do the following:

 

      Make it a federal felony instead of a misdemeanor for anyone who transports a game fowl in interstate or foreign commerce for the purposes to exhibit a game fowl in a fighting venture even in a state where the activity is legal (e.g. Louisiana and New Mexico)…

 

HSUS successfully lobbied for passage of a provision which would already make it a misdemeanor for anyone who transports a game fowl in interstate or foreign commerce for the purposes to exhibit a game fowl in a fighting venture.  This legislation was snuck into the 2002 Farm Bill and never received a Congressional Mark-up in either the House or Senate Agriculture Committee.  Now HSUS, the same organization that wants to put an end to animal agriculture, sport hunting, grey hound racing, trophy hunting, and rodeos just to name a few, wants to trample further on states rights by making it a felony for anyone transporting or selling a game fowl in interstate or foreign commerce engaged in a fighting venture, even when that venture is legal in a state or foreign country.

 

Reasons why the UGBA opposes this anti-states’ rights legislation:

 

10th Amendment:  This legislation tramples on state’s rights by denying game fowl breeders the ability to travel to a fighting venture in a legal state like Louisiana and New Mexico.  Because HSUS cannot win at the State level (legislation targeting this industry at the respective states has been defeated in the legislatures), it has now targeted the federal level as a means to end an industry it opposes.  

HSUS destroying the economic livelihood of rural America:  For many of our members, game fowl breeding is a way of life and contributes significantly to their family’s income, i.e. sales of game fowl.  The equipment sales for farms, feed for chickens, and transportation related activities (airlines, car fuel, hotels, etc…) also contribute to the economic fabric of the community.

Health:  By supporting the increase in penalties for the new federal law, you are only forcing more breeders to go underground and thus making it more difficult for associations like the UGBA to monitor gamefowl for good poultry health.

Federalizing Animal Rights:  By supporting the animal rights groups’ (HSUS and PETA) federal attempts to legislate the industry, you could be helping them open the door to criminalizing other lawful activities involving interaction with animals such as hunting, fishing, trapping, rodeos and horse racing.  Wayne Pacelle, HSUS CEO, has stated in the past that “our goal is to get sport hunting in the same category as cockfighting and dogfighting.  Our opponents say that hunting is a tradition.  We say traditions can change (Bozeman Daily Chronicle, Oct. 8, 1991).

Court Challenge: This public law has been legally challenged by the United Gamefowl Breeders Association (UGBA) in the U.S. Western District of Louisiana.  The Judge has ruled in favor of the UGBA by finding that they have standing to go to trial.  The UGBA believes since the federal courts have found that the UGBA has standing to go to trial, we should at least allow the courts to now decide what Congress has already acted on in P.L. 107-171.

For these reasons, we respectfully ask for your opposition to HR 817 and S 382!

---

The United Gamefowl Breeders Association (UGBA) was founded in 1975 to represent the interest of gamefowl breeders across the nation.  The UGBA currently represents over 100,000 gamefowl breeders in America and 15,000 dues-paying members in 33 states.  The UGBA’s primary mission is to exchange better methods and ideas toward the perpetuation and improvement of the various breeds of gamefowl, to improve marketing methods, to cooperate with Universities and other agencies in poultry disease control, and to further develop and enhance the general good health of gamefowl.

ugba@dixie-net.com
 
 

 
New Mexico.....
 
No clue as to how Luna County reps will vote on Cockfighting Bill
By Desma Montellano
Mar 10, 2005,

It was a mix of for and against comments by constituents that led Luna County's state representative to abstain from voting on it - a bill prohibiting cockfighting that soon Sen. John Arthur Smith will face.
State Rep. Dona Irwin, D-Luna County, chose not to vote on House Bill 878, the "prohibit cockfighting" bill currently in the Senate Conservation Committee. The bill passed the House with a 50-15 vote, early last week.
Irwin said her reasoning for not placing a vote, a choice which was a first for her as representative, was to be true to her constituents.
"I didn't vote, and the reason why is because I had as many calls and notes for it, as I had against it," Irwin said. "It wasn't that I was in favor of it or not... I listened to what everybody said to me.
"If it had been real one-sided, if everybody had contacted me for it, I could have voted, but it wasn't that way. It was a split, and that made it a real tough decision for me," she said.
Smith said he is not aware of when the bill will cross the Senate floor. He has recently been working with appropriation bills in the Finance Committee, and education-retirement legislation.
"If it ever gets out of the Conservation Committee, it will fly on the (Senate) floor just like it did on the House side," Smith said. "I haven't heard a word from my constituents. I probably won't know how I'll vote until I see it, and listen to the debate on the floor.
"That's when I'll make my decision (after debate)," he said.
Currently, fighting roosters is legal in New Mexico, although counties can choose to make restrictions. House Bill 878 would make cockfighting a fourth-degree felony, which carries up to 18 months jail-time, a $5,000-fine or both.
Someone guilty of "extreme cruelty" would be charged with the fourth-degree felony if he causes, sponsors, arranges, holds or participates in a fight between dogs or cocks (adult male of domestic fowl), for monetary gain or entertainment. Participation in a fight means an adult knowingly:
• being present at the fight without attempting to interfere or stop the contest
• owning or equipping one of the participating animals with knowledge of the contest.
"Cruelty to animals" would mean negligently mistreating, injuring, killing (without lawful justification), or tormenting an animal, and abandoning or failing to provide necessary sustenance to an animal under the person's custody or control.
 
Source: http://www.demingheadlight.com/artman/publish/article_3934.shtml
 


Sacramento -- On a Texas ranch, exotic sheep and antelope roam about, offering paying hunters an opportunity to bag some big game. But when the prey wanders into view, the gun can be fired by someone half a world away with the simple click of a computer mouse.

Animal activists made diners at JENNIFER LOPEZ's Pasadena, California, restaurant a little uneasy today (10MAR05) as they showed them images of animals skinned alive over lunch.

PETA launch anti-Lopez website
BreakingNews.ie Thu, 10 Mar 2005
Animal rights charity People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) have taken their hatred of Jennifer Lopez to the next level - by launching an anti-J.Lo website.