From The HSUS Comes.........
| Federal |
Status: Pending |
 |
Animal
Fighting Prohibition Enforcement ActBill
Number: S. 382 & H.R. 817HSUS Position: Support
To upgrade
current penalties by authorizing felony-level jail time for violations
of the federal animal fighting law, and to prohibit interstate and
foreign commerce of cockfighting weapons.
Animal Fighting Prohibition Enforcement
Act of 2005 (Introduced in Senate)
S 382 IS
109th CONGRESS
1st Session
S. 382
To amend title 18, United States Code, to strengthen prohibitions
against animal fighting, and for other purposes.
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
February 15, 2005
Mr. ENSIGN (for himself, Mr. SPECTER, Ms. CANTWELL, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr.
DEWINE, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. KYL, Mr. KOHL, Mr. LUGAR, Mr. VITTER, Mr. LEAHY, and
Mr. SANTORUM) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred
to the Committee on the Judiciary
A BILL
To amend title 18, United States Code, to strengthen prohibitions
against animal fighting, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United
States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `Animal Fighting Prohibition Enforcement Act
of 2005'.
SEC. 2. ENFORCEMENT OF ANIMAL FIGHTING
PROHIBITIONS.
(a) In General- Chapter 3 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by
adding at the end the following:
`Sec. 49. Animal fighting prohibition
`(a) Sponsoring or Exhibiting an Animal in an Animal Fighting Venture-
`(1) IN GENERAL- Except as provided in paragraph (2), it shall be
unlawful for any person to knowingly sponsor or exhibit an animal in an
animal fighting venture, if any animal in the venture was moved in
interstate or foreign commerce.
`(2) SPECIAL RULE FOR CERTAIN STATES- With respect to fighting ventures
involving live birds in a State where it would not be in violation of the
law, it shall be unlawful under this subsection for a person to sponsor or
exhibit a bird in the fighting venture only if the person knew that any bird
in the fighting venture was knowingly bought, sold, delivered, transported,
or received in interstate or foreign commerce for the purpose of
participation in the fighting venture.
`(b) Buying, Selling, Delivering, or Transporting Animals for
Participation in Animal Fighting Venture- It shall be unlawful for any person
to knowingly sell, buy, transport, or deliver, or receive for purposes of
transportation, in interstate or foreign commerce, any dog or other animal for
purposes of having the dog or other animal participate in an animal fighting
venture.
`(c) Use of Postal Service or Other Interstate Instrumentality for
Promoting Animal Fighting Venture- It shall be unlawful for any person to
knowingly use the mail service of the United States Postal Service or any
instrumentality of interstate commerce for commercial speech promoting an
animal fighting venture except as performed outside the limits of the States
of the United States.
`(d) Violation of State Law- Notwithstanding subsection (c), the
activities prohibited by such subsection shall be unlawful with respect to
fighting ventures involving live birds only if the fight is to take place in a
State where it would be in violation of the laws thereof.
`(e) Sharp Instruments- It shall be unlawful for any person to knowingly
sell, buy, transport, or deliver in interstate or foreign commerce a knife, a
gaff, or any other sharp instrument attached, or designed or intended to be
attached, to the leg of a bird for use in an animal fighting venture.
`(f) Penalties- Any person who violates subsection (a), (b), (c), or (e)
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than 2 years, or
both, for each such violation.
`(g) Definitions- For purposes of this section--
`(1) the term `animal fighting venture' means any event which involves a
fight between at least two animals and is conducted for purposes of sport,
wagering, or entertainment except that the term `animal fighting venture'
shall not be deemed to include any activity the primary purpose of which
involves the use of one or more animals in hunting another animal or
animals, such as waterfowl, bird, raccoon, or fox hunting;
`(2) the term `instrumentality of interstate commerce' means any
written, wire, radio, television or other form of communication in, or using
a facility of, interstate commerce;
`(3) the term `State' means any State of the United States, the District
of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and any territory or
possession of the United States; and
`(4) the term `animal' means any live bird, or any live dog or other
mammal, except man.
`(h) Conflict With State Law- The provisions of this section do not
supersede or otherwise invalidate any such State, local, or municipal
legislation or ordinance relating to animal fighting ventures except in case
of a direct and irreconcilable conflict between any requirements thereunder
and this section or any rule, regulation, or standard hereunder.'.
(b) Clerical Amendment- The table of contents for chapter 3 of title 18,
is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 48 the
following:
`49. Animal fighting prohibition'.
(c) Repeal of Criminal Penalty in the Animal Welfare Act- Section 26 of
the Animal Welfare Act (7 U.S.C. 2156) is amended by striking subsection
(e).
COSPONSORS(15),
| Sen
Cantwell, Maria [WA] - 2/15/2005 |
Sen
Collins, Susan M. [ME] - 2/17/2005 |
| Sen
DeWine, Mike [OH] - 2/15/2005 |
Sen
Durbin, Richard [IL] - 2/17/2005 |
| Sen
Feinstein, Dianne [CA] - 2/15/2005 |
Sen
Johnson, Tim [SD] - 2/28/2005 |
| Sen
Kennedy, Edward M. [MA] - 2/15/2005 |
Sen
Kohl, Herb [WI] - 2/15/2005 |
| Sen
Kyl, Jon [AZ] - 2/15/2005 |
Sen
Lautenberg, Frank R. [NJ] - 2/28/2005 |
| Sen
Leahy, Patrick J. [VT] - 2/15/2005 |
Sen
Lugar, Richard G. [IN] - 2/15/2005 |
| Sen
Santorum, Rick [PA] - 2/15/2005 |
Sen
Specter, Arlen [PA] - 2/15/2005 |
| Sen
Vitter, David [LA] - 2/15/2005 |
Animal Fighting Prohibition Enforcement
Act of 2005 (Introduced in House)
HR 817 IH
109th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 817
To amend title 18, United States Code, to
strengthen prohibitions against animal fighting, and for other
purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
February 15, 2005
Mr. GREEN of Wisconsin (for himself, Mr. BARTLETT of
Maryland, Mr. CHABOT, Mr. CHOCOLA, Mr. GALLEGLY, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. ANDREWS,
Mr. CONYERS, Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, Mr. PETERSON of Minnesota, Mr. KOLBE, Mr.
MORAN of Virginia, Mr. BASS, Mr. SANDERS, Mrs. KELLY, Mr. OWENS, Mr. PLATTS, Mr.
MCNULTY, Mrs. JOHNSON of Connecticut, Mr. SABO, Mr. PAYNE, Mr. HONDA, Mr.
BERMAN, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Ms. HARMAN, Ms. SLAUGHTER, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, and Ms.
WOOLSEY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on
the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to
be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of
such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned
A BILL
To amend title 18, United States Code, to
strengthen prohibitions against animal fighting, and for other
purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United
States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `Animal Fighting Prohibition Enforcement Act
of 2005'.
SEC. 2. ENFORCEMENT OF ANIMAL FIGHTING
PROHIBITIONS.
(a) In General- Chapter 3 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by
adding at the end the following:
`Sec. 49. Animal fighting prohibition
`(a) Sponsoring or Exhibiting an Animal in an Animal Fighting Venture-
`(1) IN GENERAL- Except as provided in paragraph (2), it shall be
unlawful for any person to knowingly sponsor or exhibit an animal in an
animal fighting venture, if any animal in the venture was moved in
interstate or foreign commerce.
`(2) SPECIAL RULE FOR CERTAIN STATES- With respect to fighting ventures
involving live birds in a State where it would not be in violation of the
law, it shall be unlawful under this subsection for a person to sponsor or
exhibit a bird in the fighting venture only if the person knew that any bird
in the fighting venture was knowingly bought, sold, delivered, transported,
or received in interstate or foreign commerce for the purpose of
participation in the fighting venture.
`(b) Buying, Selling, Delivering, or Transporting Animals for
Participation in Animal Fighting Venture- It shall be unlawful for any person
to knowingly sell, buy, transport, or deliver, or receive for purposes of
transportation, in interstate or foreign commerce, any dog or other animal for
purposes of having the dog or other animal participate in an animal fighting
venture.
`(c) Use of Postal Service or Other Interstate Instrumentality for
Promoting Animal Fighting Venture- It shall be unlawful for any person to
knowingly use the mail service of the United States Postal Service or any
instrumentality of interstate commerce for commercial speech promoting an
animal fighting venture except as performed outside the limits of the States
of the United States.
`(d) Violation of State Law- Notwithstanding subsection (c), the
activities prohibited by such subsection shall be unlawful with respect to
fighting ventures involving live birds only if the fight is to take place in a
State where it would be in violation of the laws thereof.
`(e) Sharp Instruments- It shall be unlawful for any person to knowingly
sell, buy, transport, or deliver in interstate or foreign commerce a knife, a
gaff, or any other sharp instrument attached, or designed or intended to be
attached, to the leg of a bird for use in an animal fighting venture.
`(f) Penalties- Any person who violates subsection (a), (b), (c), or (e)
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than 2 years, or
both, for each such violation.
`(g) Definitions- For purposes of this section--
`(1) the term `animal fighting venture' means any event which involves a
fight between at least two animals and is conducted for purposes of sport,
wagering, or entertainment except that the term `animal fighting venture'
shall not be deemed to include any activity the primary purpose of which
involves the use of one or more animals in hunting another animal or
animals, such as waterfowl, bird, raccoon, or fox hunting;
`(2) the term `instrumentality of interstate commerce' means any
written, wire, radio, television or other form of communication in, or using
a facility of, interstate commerce;
`(3) the term `State' means any State of the United States, the District
of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and any territory or
possession of the United States; and
`(4) the term `animal' means any live bird, or any live dog or other
mammal, except man.
`(h) Conflict With State Law- The provisions of this section do not
supersede or otherwise invalidate any such State, local, or municipal
legislation or ordinance relating to animal fighting ventures except in case
of a direct and irreconcilable conflict between any requirements thereunder
and this section or any rule, regulation, or standard hereunder.'.
(b) Clerical Amendment- The table of contents for chapter 3 of title 18,
is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 48 the
following:
`49. Animal fighting prohibition.'.
(c) Repeal of Criminal Penalty in the Animal Welfare Act- Section 26 of
the Animal Welfare Act (7 U.S.C. 2156) is amended by striking subsection
(e).
COSPONSORS(29),
| Rep
Andrews, Robert E. [NJ-1] - 2/15/2005 |
Rep
Bartlett, Roscoe G. [MD-6] - 2/15/2005 |
| Rep
Bass, Charles F. [NH-2] - 2/15/2005 |
Rep
Berman, Howard L. [CA-28] - 2/15/2005 |
| Rep
Blumenauer, Earl [OR-3] - 2/15/2005 |
Rep
Chabot, Steve [OH-1] - 2/15/2005 |
| Rep
Chocola, Chris [IN-2] - 2/15/2005 |
Rep
Clay, Wm. Lacy [MO-1] - 2/17/2005 |
| Rep
Conyers, John, Jr. [MI-14] - 2/15/2005 |
Rep
Gallegly, Elton [CA-24] - 2/15/2005 |
| Rep
Harman, Jane [CA-36] - 2/15/2005 |
Rep
Honda, Michael M. [CA-15] - 2/15/2005 |
| Rep
Johnson, Nancy L. [CT-5] - 2/15/2005 |
Rep
Kelly, Sue W. [NY-19] - 2/15/2005 |
| Rep
Kolbe, Jim [AZ-8] - 2/15/2005 |
Rep
McDermott, Jim [WA-7] - 2/15/2005 |
| Rep
McNulty, Michael R. [NY-21] - 2/15/2005 |
Rep
Moran, James P. [VA-8] - 2/15/2005 |
| Rep
Owens, Major R. [NY-11] - 2/15/2005 |
Rep
Payne, Donald M. [NJ-10] - 2/15/2005 |
| Rep
Peterson, Collin C. [MN-7] - 2/15/2005 |
Rep
Petri, Thomas E. [WI-6] - 2/17/2005 |
| Rep
Platts, Todd Russell [PA-19] - 2/15/2005 |
Rep
Sabo, Martin Olav [MN-5] - 2/15/2005 |
| Rep
Sanders, Bernard [VT] - 2/15/2005 |
Rep
Scott, Robert C. [VA-3] - 2/15/2005 |
| Rep
Slaughter, Louise McIntosh [NY-28] - 2/15/2005 |
Rep
Van Hollen, Chris [MD-8] - 2/15/2005 |
| Rep
Woolsey, Lynn C. [CA-6] - 2/15/2005 |
|
SANTA FE A proposed ban on
cockfighting remains alive in the New Mexico Legislature. The House
today voted 50-to-15 for the ban. It now goes to the Senate -- where
its prospects are uncertain.
| |
From The The U.S. Sportsmen's
Alliance.........