$Account.OrganizationName
The Gamefowl News
February 09, 2006

Greetings Gamefowl News Members!

GFN welcomes writers and submissions of news you want to see in GFN. If you are submitting an article from a news source you must provide the URL link. Please submit to GFN@nethere.com

Let these truths be indelibly impressed on our minds, that we cannot be happy without being free, that we cannot be free without being secure in our property, that we cannot be secure in our property if without our consent others may as by right take it away. John Dickenson

Make sure you have your seat belts on and lets proceed.

In this issue
  • Featured Article
  • J.P. Goodwin/HSUS Is Aligned With And Has Been A Member Of ALF
  • Side Bar Note To Mr. Roger A. Kindler/HSUS Chief Legal Officer
  • Disclaimer
  • Title 17 U.S.C. section 107

  • J.P. Goodwin/HSUS Is Aligned With And Has Been A Member Of ALF

    As our GFN members know the HSUS has threatened GFN with a lawsuit. One point of contention with them, in certified mail, was the denial that JP Goodwin "is not and never has been a member of ALF". GFN has tried to be fair about all of this by telling the truth. JP Goodwin is and 'has' been a member of the ALF. Take us to court HSUS, please please please do it.

    JP Goodwin is a convicted criminal and when the public finds out the truth about him, and HSUS, their donations will plummet, just like they did to the Texas SPCA after we busted Frank David Garcia.

    Please take the time to read through the article from The Dallas Morning News, Date: February 15, 1998...

    Guerrillas say they fight to help liberate animals. FBI considers group's members domestic terrorists.

    Author: Doug J. Swanson Date: February 15, 1998 Section: NEWS Page: 1A

    They torched a slaughterhouse in Oregon, and they burned a mink feed plant in Utah. In a number of states including Texas, they raided ranches to set chinchillas and chickens free. Last year was a busy one for the shadowy commandos of the Animal Liberation Front. This year is expected to be busier.

    The FBI considers them domestic terrorists, while they present themselves as modern-day abolitionists. Instead of freeing slaves, they open cages at fur farms or clog the plumbing at fast-food restaurants.

    In publications and at Internet Web sites, animal liberators are encouraged to pursue a broad range of actions, from peaceful protests to arson.

    The future may bring less peace and more fires. Watchers on both sides -- police and supporters -- predict that 1998 will be more damaging to ALF targets.

    "I see a greater trend toward actions that do more destruction," said Rodney Coronado, a former ALF operative now in federal prison.

    Agreement comes from Barry Clausen, a Seattle-area investigator who monitors front activity. "It will continue to get worse," he said. "Nobody thinks it won't. " The underground group, operating in secret cells, has no formal structure, and law enforcement officials provide no estimates of ALF membership. Foes and observers gauge the front's strength by the frequency and force of its tactics.

    By that measure, it has enjoyed a recent boom. "There's been a tremendous upsurge of activity," said J.P. Goodwin of Dallas, who describes himself as a former member.

    To ALF allies, taking milk from cows is the equivalent of rape, and aquariums are "fish prisons. " Collecting honey from bees is cruel exploitation.

    "A lot of times they smoke the bees out of their hives," Mr. Goodwin said,"and that hurts them. " Labs in which animals such as rats are used for experiments -- including those involved in research on lifesaving medications -- are seen as concentration camps.

    "Rats feel pain," said Mr. Goodwin's companion, Lydia Nichols. "They feel fear. They love. " ALF traces its beginnings to England in the 1960s and the Hunt Saboteurs Association. That small group laid false scents and blew horns to send fox hunting hounds in the wrong direction.

    In the next decade, members began burning seal hunters' boats and pharmaceutical labs. Those activities generated more support, and ALF was formed in 1976.

    The ALF is an easy club to join for those not averse to damaging property. "If you went to a fur store on Central and threw a rock through the window," said Mr. Goodwin, "you could say you were a member of the ALF. " Mr. Goodwin, 25, came to Dallas in 1996 after pleading guilty and serving probation for vandalizing fur stores in Memphis, Tenn.

    Now heading a group known as the Coalition Against the Fur Trade, he receives "communiques" by phone and mail from ALF guerrillas detailing their activities.

    In the realm of animal rights activists, ALF is far more extreme than more well known groups such as the Humane Society and People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals.

    PETA has assisted the Animal Liberation Front financially -- it paid for Mr. Coronado's attorney -- but the two groups seem to be drifting apart. "We are considered a bit fuddy- duddy now by them," said PETA president Ingrid Newkirk.

    While PETA has organized protests around appearances of the Oscar Mayer Wienermobile, ALF has been engaging in such actions as the burning of the Oregon slaughterhouse. The horse-rendering plant, in Redmond, was destroyed in September by a fire started with flammable jelly.

    That and other arsons are depicted by the front as skirmishes in an ethical war. "In this age of insanity you may be branded a terrorist," says an ALF guide posted on the Internet, "but you will one day be remembered as a selfless warrior who dared fight for what is right. " Richard Huber, director of the Pacific Coast Tissue Bank in Los Angeles, has a hard time accepting such declarations. Horse tissue provided for free by the Oregon slaughterhouse was being used for regenerative surgery on.

    The slaughterhouse fire left the bank without the tissue it needed for months.

    "I wish they [the arsonists] had to make the phone calls from their high moral ground saying, `Sorry, but your deformed child is not going to be operated on this week or this month or maybe this year,"' Mr. Huber said.. "The moral compass of these people is no longer operating. It's almost a joke - if they weren't doing so much harm. " Much of what they are doing is cataloged in a diary on the Internet at a Web site that also gives explicit instructions for committing arson. The 1997 diary cites more than 200 North American incidents of varying degrees of severity.

    Dozens of fur stores, several in Dallas among them, were vandalized with broken windows and glued locks. Arsonists torched a hunt-supply store in Washington, a slaughterhouse truck near San Francisco, a fur retailer in Minnesota and a laboratory at the University of California at Davis.

    In November, ALF members released 500 wild horses and 40 burros from a U.S. Bureau of Land Management corral in Oregon. Pens and chutes were burned.

    The action came after newspaper reports that some wild horses rounded up by the government had been sold for slaughter.

    Afterward, the front released an Internet proclamation: "Genocide against the horse nation will not go unchallenged! " This salvation impulse does not extend only to mammals. In Seattle last March, nighttime raiders trashed a poultry plant.

    "Three chickens [were] liberated," the ALF diary notes, "and placed in a loving home. " Fast food restaurants have been frequent targets as well, because front members believe they are the moneymaking operations of mass murderers. McDonald's was the most popular, with ALF claiming 19 attacks last year. Most incidents involved petty vandalism, such as stopping up toilets and painting "McDeath" graffiti.

    But the stakes may be raised. Last fall an ALF-sympathetic magazine known as Undergound urged its readers to "directly attack the equipment they use to fry dead animals. " The magazine ran instructions for disabling, from the roof, the electrical systems of McDonald's outlets.

    Representatives from McDonald's corporate headquarters in Illinois did not respond to three requests by The Dallas Morning News for comment.

    ALF partisans also have stepped up their raids on fur farms in the last two years, with at least 15 occurring in 1997. Only two were claimed in 1995.

    Typically, the liberators slip onto ranches after dark and unlatch the cages of minks and foxes that are being raised for their pelts.

    The releases do not always go as planned. Domestically bred animals often are not equipped to survive in the wild.

    In May about 8,000 minks were set free from an Oregon farm. The owner later said several thousand of them died from starvation or exposure. ALF backers acknowledge animal deaths in such raids, but add that the minks were slated to be killed anyway.

    "Yes, some of them could get hit by cars," said Sandra Lewis, New York director for Friends of Animals. "But you know what? A few will escape.

    `If you were in a prison camp and you knew you were going to be tortured, which would you choose? " she said. "Certain torture and death, or the chance of escape? " Nearly all of the fur farms struck by ALF raiders last year were listed -- address included -- in a directory published by Friends of Animals. The group is not affiliated with ALF but backs some of its actions.

    "These people obviously are trying to incite others to do violence," said Marsha Kelly, spokeswoman for the Fur Commission USA, an industry association.

    Ms. Lewis said Friends of Animals printed the locations of fur farms "in case people wanted to take a tour. " Whatever the intent, the directory and the raids have produced suspicion and fear among breeders. Most of those contacted by The News, including the owner of a northeast Texas chinchilla ranch, refused to talk about ALF.

    An exception was Ryan Holt, co-owner of a South Jordan, Utah, mink farm. In 1996 four men jumped the fence at the Holt farm and released 3,000 minks. They also drained the oil from a pickup truck, Mr. Holt said.

    "They were saving the world," he said. "There goes your groundwater, but, hey ... " One 21-year-old man has been convicted for his role in the raid, and another is awaiting trial. Most of the animals were recovered, but years of breeding records were destroyed.

    "You work at something for 35 years," Mr. Holt said, "and a couple of kids who think they're in the right can come in and ruin it in a few hours. " ALF backers depict fur farms as bastions of depravity, with neurotic animals engaging in self-mutilation. Being in a cage, Mr. Goodwin said "drives them insane. " Mr. Holt said mink ranches are "as humane an operation as you'll find in any animal industry. " Veterinarians help set treatment standards, a Fur Commission publication says, and death by carbon monoxide is "without stress or pain. " Both sides have turned the fight into a propaganda war. The anti-fur forces produce videotapes that show mink breeders blithely breaking the necks of the animals. Pamphlets carry pictures of anal electrocution devices used on foxes.

    The Fur Commission prints brochures with photos of farmers gently handling healthy animals. It also links itself to issues with more appeal than mink coats, running print ads that put it on the side of "sick kids. " One shows a drawing of a child in a hospital bed, flanked by protesters carrying signs .with slogans such as, "Save the lab rats! " ALF activists have attacked at least a dozen university labs over the past 11 years, attempting to free animals and destroy research.

    "It has a big chilling effect on the research community as a whole," said Mishka McCowan, spokesman for Americans for Medical Progress.

    The group, partially funded by pharmaceutical companies, says that experiments on animals have been . to the development of drugs to prevent or treat a variety of diseases, including polio and cancer.

    "Animal research is the absolute bedrock of medical science," Mr. McCowan said.

    ALF supporters say using animals :n labs for human benefit falsely presumes that man has the moral right to exploit animals.

    "There isn't a hierarchy of life," Mr. Coronado said, "but one in which all life is equal. " Now 31, Mr. Coronado is serving a 7-month federal sentence in Tucson, Ariz., for aiding and abetting the burning of a Michigan State University laboratory.

    He said his animal rights beliefs are consistent with his Yaqui Indian heritage,"motivated by compassion and love and respect for life. " But as with many ALF actions, the acts for which Mr. Coronado was convicted cannot be easily presented as a case of good vs. evil. The 1992 fire did destroy some findings that could have been useful to the fur industry. It also demolished the work of an assistant professor whose research could have led to reduced use of animals in labs.

    Moreover, "they could have killed people here," said Michigan State spokeswoman Sue Nichols. "There were people in the building when they set fire to it. " Mr. Coronado may be released from prison in a year. He renounced ALF at his 1994 sentencing -- "a strategy," he said last month, "to get as light a sentence as possible. " Now he hopes to become the group's spokesman.

    "If ALF was to get an above-ground voice, a political lobby, that is the next challenge," he said.

    While the front contemplates a public face, law enforcement has accelerated its anti-ALF efforts. "This is something the FBI and the Department of Justice know we need to step up, and we need to pay close attention to," said Ron Van Vranken, an FBI special agent.

    In Utah, police have made a series of arrests of suspected ALF arsonists linked to the "Straight Edge" movement, which forbids use of tobacco, drugs and alcohol.

    There, individuals with suspected ALF connections have been convicted of setting fire to a McDonald's, of trying to firebomb a leather store and of burning down a mink breeder's feed cooperative.

    One of ALF's principles has always been that no human or animal should be harmed in its actions. But some ALF-watchers believe the movement could be headed toward increased radicalization, with violent results.

    Seattle- area investigator Clausen said that he met recently with FBI agents, and that this concern was shared. "The radical rhetoric is eventually going to end up with death," he said. "There's not one person I deal with who doesn't think this."


    Side Bar Note To Mr. Roger A. Kindler/HSUS Chief Legal Officer

    GFN again welcomes a lawsuit from the likes of HSUS.

    Fred Crane


    Disclaimer

    This site does not advocate or endorse any activities that are in violation of Federal, State, or Local laws.


    Title 17 U.S.C. section 107

    In compliance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, GFN is distributed free, without profit or payment, for non- profit research and educational purposes only.


    Featured Article
    We play for keeps

    Government Wants Jurisdiction Over All Farm Animals

    February 1, 2006 NewsWithVie ws.com

    “Farming is not much fun any more,” are the words we hear from agricultural producers across the nation. While organizations such as the Environmental Working Group are working against agriculture and falsely leading the public to believe government subsidies are making farmers rich, farmers are asking “how can we survive and how much more invasive can the government get?” The government is already using space-based satellites to measure the crops on every farm in the country and now the United States Department of Agriculture has plans to give an Orwellian touch to owning any type of farm animal. Are we permitting fear to take away another freedom?

    Whether you are a large commercial producer or your child has a single horse or chicken for a 4-H project, each animal must be registered with the National Animal Identification System (NAIS) and the premise where the animal is kept is to be identified in a national data base, according to the USDA. Read: Animal ID Rolls Ahead With Premises Registration. USDA says that 25 percent of the premises are to be registered by April, 2006, and by July every state is to have an Interstate Certificate of Veterinary Inspection system in place. By January 2008, all premises and all animals are to be registered and by July of 2008 movement of all animals will be tracked. If this is not done by January of 2009, the consequences will be severe.

    Animals that must be identified with a chip or identification mark will be cattle/bison, sheep, goats, swine, horses, poultry & birds, deer/elk, llamas and alpacas. Animal identification and premise registration is voluntary until 2009. After that date there will be a $1,000 per day fine for noncompliance. “The USDA has no legal jurisdiction over your livestock,” G. B. Oliver of the Paragon Foundation told the radio audience on the Derry Brownfield Show. “While producers are thinking how they must comply or face a noncompliance fine of $1,000 per day, they should be questioning the legality of the USDA to impose this animal identification system in the first place.”

    In Henry Lamb’s excellent article The Mark of the Beast, he said, “The stated purpose of the program is to enable government to trace, within 48 hours, the source of a faulty animal food product. The effect of the program is the transfer of the control of private property to the government - while forcing the property owner to pay the cost of the transfer.” These mandates will probably put most small producers totally out of business as the requirements will be far too costly and time-consuming to be profitable. There will be no such thing as having a few chickens, sheep, pigs, horses or any other animal unless you want the headache of compliance. Perhaps that is the real plan behind this extreme proposal. Many producers rotate their livestock to pastures on more than one farm they own or rent. Each farm will be required to have an individual premise number and records will have to be kept on each animal each time it is moved. The cost and time of the record-keeping alone will be impossible for most.

    While dogs and cats are not included in the NAIS mandate, many states are now passing extensive chipping, neutering, spaying and litter laws that are as extreme as the NAIS mandates. If the purpose of all this tracking is to identify diseased animals, how will they handle the identification of deer and elk known to harbor Chronic Wasting Disease? Eating these animals would appear to be far more risky than eating domestically raised animals. In the United States, we have known for quite some time that elk and deer are plagued with Chronic Wasting Disease, a near cousin to Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE or mad cow) in cows and Scrapies in sheep. We are told these diseases, although similar, are contained within their own species. BSE in cows, Scrapies in sheep, CWD in deer and elk, Creutzfeldt- Jakob disease in humans, are all a form of spongiform encephalopathy, which is a disease that destroys the brain and is always fatal.

    Should we be concerned? Of course, we should--and we expect the USDA to inspect meat to be sold for consumption. But we need to be rational about how we address this problem and take into consideration the number of fatalities from this disease and how many cows in the United States have been found to have the mad cow disease before we cry “the sky is falling.”

    Could this be more about control of property than concern about disease? The following is what the government is requiring from animal owners: National Animal Identification website.

    Various species' working groups have suggested that certain basic events will trigger the need for reporting animal movements (e.g., change of ownership, interstate movement, multiple owners commingling their animals, etc). Each location will have a Premises Identification Number (PIN), and the responsible party will report the AIN or GIN of all animals that arrive at that premises and the date of their arrival.

    There are essentially four pieces of information required to document an animal movement event. The table below shows the four pieces of information that will be stored in a national animal records repository:

    1. Animal Identification Number, AIN, or Group/Lot Identification Number, GIN
    2. Premises Identification Number, PIN, of the location where the event takes place
    3. Date of the event
    4. Event type (movement in, movement out, sighting of an animal at a location, termination of the animal, etc)

    The following table shows the 12 pieces of information that will be stored in a -national premises system.

    National Premises Information Repository—Data Elements:

    1. Premises ID Number
    2. Name of Entity
    3. Owner or Appropriate Contact Person
    4. Street Address, City, State, Zip/Postal Code
    5. Contact Phone Number
    6. Operation Type (e.g., production unit, exhibition, abattoir, etc.)
    7. Date Activated
    8. Date Retired (e.g., date operation is sold, date operation is no longer maintaining -livestock)
    9. Reason Retired

    An anti-NAIS grassroots group states that “while NAIS’s purported goal of disease containment appears to be beneficial, the requirement for American citizens to register privately-owned property for tracking and monitoring purposes has very serious implications on our privacy rights and freedoms.

    Sources say the Avian flu virus comes from direct contact with the bird and to date it has not mutated from human to human unless it has been done in a laboratory experiment. How many cases have been reported in the United States? Yet the past few months we have seen nothing but hype about the “bird flu” and the need for a vaccine.

    Perhaps we should follow the money trail and we might see why these programs are so attractive. Consider the dollars to the pharmaceutical companies in providing a vaccine for the Avian flu. “The U.S. Senate has already approved a $3.9 billion package to buy vaccines and antiviral medications, and the Administration is also preparing a request for an additional $6 billion to $10 billion," according to a current Business Week and reported by Dr. Len Horowitz.

    Missouri resident Doreen Hannes has been researching the funding for NAIS and found the Bioterrorism Act of 2002 is a major funder for the development of the NAIS plan. She reports the Act gave $380 million to develop the NAIS plan. A USDA veterinarian told Hannes he predicted the plan would cost the taxpayers $33 billion to implement. This would not include the cost of continuation and cost to individuals raising the animals. The states will jump at the $14.3 million in grant money available to them. "WASHINGTON, June 21, 2005-Agriculture Secretary Mike Johanns today announced that USDA will be accepting funding applications from state and tribal governments to continue registering premises for the national animal identification system (NAIS). Approximately $14.3 million will be available to state and tribal cooperators."

    This whole scenario is a reminder of Henny Penny when the acorn fell on her head. "THE SKY IS FALLING! THE SKY IS FALLING!" cries Henny Penny. "I must run and tell the king." Off she runs to tell the king and along the way she picks up her friends. They meet Foxy Loxy. He says: "Where are you going Henny Penny, Cocky Locky, Ducky Lucky, Goosey Loosey and Turkey Lurky?" When Henny Penny tells him where they are going and why, he says: "Ah, but this is not the way to the palace. Follow me. I will show you."

    If we are forced to comply with the USDA mandates of putting an identification such as the RFID chip in each animal and identifying each premise, there will be no Henny Penny, Cocky Locky, Ducky Lucky, Goosey Loosey or Turkey Lurky, as Foxy Loxy will have made certain the farm is no place for them!

    © 2006 Joyce Morrison - All Rights Reserved

    URL Link Here
    Quick Links...

    The Feathered Warrior

    The U.S. Sportsmen's Alliance

    National Rifleman's Association

    National Animal Interest Alliance

    PETA Kills Animals

    Ted Nugent

    Target Of Opportunity

    United Animal Owners Alliance



    Join our mailing list!