|
Greetings Gamefowl News Members!
GFN welcomes writers and submissions of news you
want to see in GFN. If you are submitting an article
from a news source you must provide the URL link.
Please submit to
GFN@nethere.com Also, we cannot and will not
open attachments unless you contact us first and tell
us you are sending one.
Patriotism is easy to understand in America. It
means looking out for yourself by looking out for your
country.
Calvin Coolidge
Make sure you have your seat belts on and lets
proceed.
| Rodney Coronado Was Sentenced To Eight Months |
 |
|
From the The Arizona Daily Star
Animal activist Rodney Coronado was sentenced to
eight months in prison and three years supervised
probation this morning for his role in the disruption of
a 2004 mountain lion hunt in Sabino Canyon.
Coronado, a Tucsonan, was convicted in December of
conspiracy to impede or injure an officer of the
United States, a felony, and misdemeanor counts of
interfering with a forest officer and depredation of
government property. He was also ordered to pay
$100 restitution.
|
| For All Hunters, Read This |
 |
|
PETA's Secret Brick
Anti-hunting message finds its way past unsuspecting
committee at Hunters' Memorial Park.
You will find that statement on PeTA's website By Clicking Here.
Just scroll down to the bottom and you'll find it in the
middle of the page, that is if they have not already
removed it. But hey, that's OK, we have a screen
shot of it, just in case.
Many moons ago GFN reported about how the ART's
(Animal Rights Terrorists) were jumping with glee over
the senseless murder of the hunters PeTA refers to in
this piece of theirs. If you don't already know, PeTA
wants you DEAD.
|
| Letter To The Editor |
 |
|
This comes in from one of our GFN Members...
My Final Letter To The Feds. August 2, 2006 Sent by
Carol Murphy
To;
- FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
- J. EDGAR HOOVER BUILDING
- Attn: HON: ROBERT S. MUELLER III.,
DIRECTOR
- 935 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE N.W.
- WASHINGTON, D.C. 20535
- DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
- Attn: HON. MICHAEL CHERTOFF. SECRETARY
- NEBRASKA AVENUE COMPLEX
- WASHINGTON, D.C. 20528
- UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
- Attn: HON. ALBERTO R. GONZALES, ATTORNEY
GENERAL OF THE U.S.
- OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
- 950. PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, N.W.
- WASHINGTON, D.C. 20530
- OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY
- DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
- Attn: HON. CLAUDIA J. FLYNN, DIRECTOR
- ADVISORY OFFICE
- SUITE 3529
- 950 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE
- WASHINGTON, D.C. 20528
Subject:
- (a) Treason
- (b) Overthrow of the U.S. Government
- (c) Racketeering (FBI did not investigate)
- (d) Domestic Terrorism (FBI and Homeland
Security did not investigate)
- (e) Demand for a Federal Grand Jury to
Investigate and Bring Charges
Dear Sir/Madame:THIS LETTER IS A FORMAL
COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR INVESTIGATION
Approximately 1-1/2 years ago, I wrote to you and
the Maine Field Office in Boston, Massachusetts
asking for an investigation into the above topics in
the State of Maine. I received no response though
my information was delivered to you because it was
sent via UPS who tracked it.
In May 2006, a Notice of Intent to File a Class Action
Law Suit was sent to you in Washington, D.C. for
non-performance of your job and damages as a result
of that non-performance. Again, we have heard
nothing.
You have 30 days to respond to this formal Complaint
and Demand for Investigation. If there is again no
word, or your offices refuse to investigate, the Class
Action Law Suit will be filed in the U.S. District Court
and media will be alerted.
1. In Maine, U.S. District Court, Bangor, Maine judges
(Margaret Kravchuk and John Woodcock) have
changed Federal Rules and laws in Civil cases being
heard in their court. The illegal judicial acts were
done at the behest of the Maine Attorney General G.
Steven Rowe and Maine Assistant Attorney General
Christopher Taub. These four are legal experts chose
to solicit or commit illegal judicial acts that violated
their Oaths of Office constituting treason against the
U.S. Constitution and the U.S. Government. In
addition, these people denied citizen’s right to due
process and equal protection under the law by
refusing to allow citizen’s response to the State of
Maine’s solicitation of illegal judicial acts designed to
obstruct justice on behalf of State of Maine and all
defendants they represent (approximately 55).
Again, this broke their Oath of Office and constitutes
criminal acts against a citizen of the United
States.2. State of Maine routinely steals property
from citizens under Color of Law in direct violation of
the U.S. Constitution and Federal laws written by
Congress by breaking and entering into locked houses
and barns; conducting unconstitutional searches
without benefit of a warrant and without permission.
On occasion a blank warrant is used. It does not list
the date, things to be taken, no name or address of
the place to be searched, and no signature of a
judge, yet private property on private land is
destroyed or stolen. There are generally NO charges
against the owners but if there are charges, they are
Civil. As you know, Civil charges cannot give rise to
probable cause and the U.S. Constitution requires
probable cause in order to get a warrant. 3.
Official oppression and Extortion (threats that
Criminal charges will be brought or business licenses
will be cancelled) are used by officials to force
owners to sign over their property to the State of
Maine which is done under Color or Law. If the owner
refuses, Criminal charges ARE initiated or business
licenses ARE cancelled even though the owner has
committed no offense. 4. District Attorneys and
Assistant District Attorneys have violated their Oaths
of Office. They routinely tamper with evidence,
manufacture photographs, tamper with witnesses,
secure perjured testimony and use it in court against
the citizens despite this being illegal under the laws
and U.S. Constitution. Perjured testimony is
knowingly used by District Attorneys against citizens
(and Yes, I can prove it). 5. Maine Supreme
Judicial Court Justices already named in law suits
brought by citizens in the U.S. District Courts are
allowed to be on panels that decide citizens’
appeals. This deprives the citizen of unbiased,
unprejudiced assessment of their appeal, i.e., due
process and equal treatment under the law do not
exist. 6. Threats of jailing citizens for not
being able to pay unconstitutional fines and
extending probation indefinitely are used despite U.S.
Supreme Court rulings that such tactics are
unconstitutional and despite the fact that a lower
court cannot overturn U.S. Supreme Court decisions.
Again, Maine courts are making up their own rules
and enforcing their own laws in violation of the U.S.
Constitution. Maine has already overthrown the U.S.
Constitution. They have violated their Oath of Office
which constitutes criminal acts and
treason. 7. Property stolen by the State
without a warrant is then laundered through non-
profit organizations under contract to the State and
sold thus avoiding the payment of IRS
taxes. 8. Stolen property is transported
within and outside of the State. 9. Judges
deny citizens a jury trial even though the property
stolen is worth thousands or hundreds of thousands
of dollars. 10. There is no Just Compensation
for property stolen from citizens and no Due Process;
again in direct violation of the United States
Constitution. 11. Chief Justice Leigh Saufley,
Maine Judicial Supreme Court, plus judges, law
enforcement and others have received training by
domestic terrorist organizations in how to steal
citizens’ property under Color of Law. The domestic
terrorists have rewritten their “First Strike” program
to make it palatable to adults. 12. A large
number of the citizens targeted for these
unconstitutional activities are elderly. Once the
State steals their businesses these people have no
income so they have no means of fighting back – and
certainly your offices have failed to protect them
even though you were begged to do your jobs and
investigate. 13. Lawyers engaged by citizens
are bribed or threatened that if the citizen wins the
case, the lawyers will never win another case in that
state. The lawyers, themselves under official
oppression and extortion, sell out their
clients. 14. Once a citizen’s property is stolen
by State of Maine, the domestic terrorists start a
letter writing, telephone, email campaign to officials
to put pressure on them to violate citizens’ rights
further by demanding psychological examinations,
criminal charges and more. The crooked courts give
the domestic terrorists everything they want because
the courts are being paid by the domestic terrorists.
In some cases the domestic terrorists put up a web
site naming the owner and using libel and slander to
get unsuspecting citizens to contact authorities and
demand illegal charges against the victims of
theft. 14. Once a citizen’s property is stolen
by State of Maine, the domestic terrorists start a
letter writing, telephone, email campaign to officials
to put pressure on them to violate citizens’ rights
further by demanding psychological examinations,
criminal charges and more. The crooked courts give
the domestic terrorists everything they want because
the courts are being paid by the domestic terrorists.
In some cases the domestic terrorists put up a web
site naming the owner and using libel and slander to
get unsuspecting citizens to contact authorities and
demand illegal charges against the victims of
theft. 15. In actual fact, in the State of
Maine, the U.S. government and U.S. Constitution
have already been overthrown. Courts as set up by
and under the laws of the U.S. Constitution and Bill of
Rights do not exist. Citizens are already living in a
police state with no recourse when Gestapo-type
Storm Troopers steal what they have worked their
entire lives to have. Indeed newer unconstitutional
warrants often list “money” as an item these
domestic terrorist trained puppets can steal from
citizens. 16. There is much more, but the
bottom line to these activities is nothing noble. The
bottom line is the selling of stolen property to further
the activities of the domestic terrorist organizations.
By your refusal to do your job, you are aiding these
domestic terrorists in their expansion and overthrow
of the U.S. Government and the U.S.
Constitution.
You already know all of the above and more. You
knew it before this letter reached you because your
own Counter Terrorism unit has repeatedly testified
to the validity of what is in this letter but you have
chosen to do nothing. You have allowed U.S.
citizens to be unconstitutionally arrested and thrown
into jail or put under house arrest for indefinite
periods of time. You have allowed the courts to
commit treason and work to overthrow the U.S.
Government and the U.S. Constitution.
You have helped domestic terrorists attack citizens
and steal their property. You have helped domestic
terrorists launder stolen property through non-profit
organizations and cheat the U.S. Government of their
rightful taxes. All the while, citizens are paying
taxes, citizens are suffering, citizens are the victims
of both the domestic terrorists and the federal
agencies set up to protect them, agencies who have
now defected to the domestic terrorist cause by their
inaction. The overthrow of the U.S. Constitution and
the U.S. Government could not have happened
without your assistance. Either do your jobs NOW, or
come out in the light and stand with your domestic
terrorist buddies before the citizens of the United
States and declare your allegiance.
You have 30 days from the date on this letter to get
back to me with a plan of action to investigate the
above allegations. You already received your Notice
of Intent to sue back in May 2006. If you again
choose to side with domestic terrorists against the
citizens of the United States of America, you will be
prosecuted in a court of law and this story will be
brought into focus for the American people as yet
unaware of what is and has happened. The law suit
will seek upwards of $900 million in damages for the
seven people who initiated it - - more if other
citizens join it.
If you wish to contact me or any of the other people
on the Class Action Law Suit, you can do so via
telephone or mail. If you wish to set up a meeting,
that would be fine BUT, please note that such a
meeting will be at a mutually convenient time and
location and tape recorders, witnesses, and video
cameras will be used to make a record of that
meeting as irrefutable proof of what is said. That
information will be made available to the media should
citizens choose to do so.
Respectfully,
- Carol Murphy
- 248 Lane Road
- New Sharon, ME 04955
- Tel: 207-778-6024
- Email: Stoessel65@yahoo.com
Editors note: This case involves the seizure of
animals (private property). If you wish to join
this "Class Action". Please contact the author listed
above.
|
| The Granny Warriors |
 |
|
Please remember to visit GFN's 'quick links'. We are
pleased to help support the "Granny Warriors". They
are taking action that only Grannys can do. We hope
the Members of GFN will show them the same support
our staff does.
|
| Disclaimer |
 |
|
This site does not advocate or endorse any activities
that are in violation of Federal, State, or Local laws.
|
| Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 |
 |
|
In compliance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, GFN is
distributed free, without profit or payment, for non-
profit research and educational purposes only.
|
|
Featured Article |
|
|
|
There Is Nothing Unclear About The Second
Amendment
The following is a letter to The Gainesville Times. We
thought it appropriate to share with our Members.
The Members of GFN surely own guns and will find
this letter interesting, to say the least...
Mike Freeman could not have been more wrong when
he stated the Second Amendment was "murky" on
gun rights. He also stated that, "Nobody today really
knows what Madison and the First Congress intended
with this amendment."
When the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights
were written, the authors had just finished fighting a
horrible war against an oppressive government. They
wanted to make sure that would never happen again.
They also believed that the individual had the right to
protect person and property.
When James Madison introduced the Bill of Rights in
the House of Representatives, he noted that the
amendments "relate first to private rights." And again
in "The Federalist No. 46," "The Constitution
preserves the advantage of being armed, which
Americans possess over the people of almost every
other nation ... (where the governments are afraid to
trust the people with arms.)"
Samuel Adams said, "The Constitution shall never be
construed to prevent the people of the United states
who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own
arms." Mass. U.S. Constitution Ratification
Convention. (1788).
Alexander Hamilton said, "The best we can hope for
concerning the people at large is that they be
properly armed." The Federalist Papers.
Tench Coxe, a prominent Federalist said, "Who are
the militia? Are they not ourselves? ... Congress have
no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and
every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the
birthright of an American. The unlimited power of the
sword is not in the hands of either the federal or
state governments but, where I trust in God it will
ever remain, in the hands of the people."
The intent and purpose of the Second Amendment
and its authors is very clear, sir. The private
ownership of firearms is a right guaranteed by the
Constitution. You should know that the NRA is the
only organization with enough political power to stand
up to the members of our government that don't like
the private citizen to privately own guns.
Yes, they do have influence and raise money to fight
unreasonable gun-control legislation, and yes they do
think I ought to be allowed to purchase a gun of my
choice. Who is to decide what is too many or too
big? You? Me? The mayor of New York City? The
governor of Georgia?
The Founding Fathers and the framers of the
Constitution already have decided, "The right of the
people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
As to the false sense of security I get from owning
my own guns, you should remember that in the last
century, the Afghan people used their small arms to
kill more than 35,000 Russian troops and sent the
Russian Army home. And if your concern is
the "crazies" and the safety of our children, then
punish the crazies and teach the children. When
someone uses a gun during the commission of a
crime, punish them by taking them out of society.
Period.
Educate the children, don't isolate them. Take
personal responsibility and teach the kids that guns
can be dangerous and must be respected. Teach
children that video games and movies are not real
life. We are ineffective at protecting our children
because we won't put out the effort to educate
them. We won't take responsibility and do what we
must to teach them about gun safety. We would
rather depend on the government to regulate guns.
The Second Amendment is clear. It grants us the
right and gives us the great responsibility of private
ownership of firearms.
- Walter Sippel
- Gainesville
- Originally published Monday, July 31, 2006
Click Here For The URL Link
|
|