$Account.OrganizationName
The Gamefowl News
August 16, 2006

Greetings Gamefowl News Members!

GFN welcomes writers and submissions of news you want to see in GFN. If you are submitting an article from a news source you must provide the URL link. Please submit to GFN@nethere.com Also, we cannot and will not open attachments unless you contact us first and tell us you are sending one.

Our government... teaches the whole people by its example. If the government becomes the lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy Louis D. Brandeis

.

Make sure you have your seat belts on and lets proceed.

In this issue
  • Statement From The Staff At GFN
  • H5N1 Avian Flu, A Natural Occurrence Or Is It Out Of A Test Tube?
  • USDA Cooperative Research and Development Agreements
  • USSA Files Complaint with Postal Service Regarding Anti-Dove Hunting Stamps
  • Action You Can Take
  • The Granny Warriors
  • Disclaimer
  • Title 17 U.S.C. section 107

  • Statement From The Staff At GFN

    Dear GFN Members,

    We at GFN consider our Members to be some of the most informed and well rounded individuals in their specific area of expertise. We also appreciate your kind, and sometimes not so kind, letters to us. It is clear, to the staff of GFN, that you 'get it' in what we do. Our mission is get out the truth to our Members in a manner which you can understand and digest. Sometimes you have to take a step back and say to yourselves "could this be true?". We assure you it is. The ARA's/ART's are trying to take your rights and property from you. This is not just happening in America, it's going on all over the world. Maybe that's why we have members from "all over the world". Our member list grows daily and we are excited that others are starting to "get it". In this issue of GFN you will see some of what we are up against.


    H5N1 Avian Flu, A Natural Occurrence Or Is It Out Of A Test Tube?

    Writen by GFN Staff Writer JIMDEM:

    In the 1940's and later I had the grand opportunity to spend most of my time with my maternal grandfather. Armand Ortego was a very short man who made his living as a share cropper and had no formal education. His French language was colorful but he could not write a word of it.

    Armand was very vigilant of the changes in weather as he had to interpret things for himself because there were no weather men to keep him informed. He could explain heredity factors in chickens and cattle that years later I again learned in a Collage class on Animal Husbandry. Observation was his tool and an accurate interpretation of this information was his defense.

    We have observed the domestication of animals and have watched the physical changes to animals as we selective breed for special utility. Short snout pigs waste less feed. Long backs on cattle give us more stakes, Wool less sheep can be raised in hotter climates and the list goes on. But we let these special breed animals return to the wild and our pigs soon grow longer snouts for rooting, cattle become shorter and carry less flesh and our sheep move to higher cooler climates and grow longer wool. So what does this have to do with the H5n1 Avian Flu?

    Observation is what this has to do with H5n1. As the disease progresses in time it has become less and less transmitted to birds and fewer humans are infected. Telling observers that it is going from a specialized state back to a natural state. Or what we would call this process in animals, returning to a feral state. Am I accusing someone in manufacturing this disease to be a special influence in poultry?? Yes!

    Now why would someone want to do such a horrid thing? Let us look at animal rights groups for a second. What could they gain. Ahhh let me count the ways. How about some of those Vegan whack jobs who are also animal rights cultist, let us OBSERVE some of their comments about people who use animals for food or recreation. How about those animal right/vegan cultist who are in University research who would like to see animals removed from the vivisection tests? Could one of these zealots manufacture and spread this Dr. Jeckel brew for the purpose of keeping man form eating chickens and wild fowl. Yeaaaa buddy,,,, I think so...

    And why would you think such a thing about your fellow man sir.?? Observation, we look at the past history of the ALF/ELF and read of the lab raids on Universities and Pharmaceutical Companies. We read stories by like minded wealthy academia's with influence to spread and it is no big mental jump to the possibility that H5N1 is not willingly spread by Mother Natures nor is it from her oven.

    What makes you think Mother Nature is not a willing participant?? We have had several changes of season since the beginning of this outbreak and we have multiple international flyways that could deliver this disease to our front door, but, look it isn't there, it isn't here, it isn't in any area that has a Animal Rights, Vegan or ALF/ELF influence. Why would you want to spread something you could catch and have it kill you. Observe.

    Time tells all stories hidden by man and mother nature. Observe.


    USDA Cooperative Research and Development Agreements

    We at GFN are confidant our Members can read between the lines of what is being said in this USDA publication. This shows some of the power that the USDA has in getting partnerships with corporations for income/power for both while regulating the average citizen out of the way and into a captive consumer world wide.

    The Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) program is the primary tool linking government and industry researchers. This program, authorized under the Federal Technology Transfer Act of 1986, allows federal laboratories and businesses to form commercial partnerships that help move new technologies into the marketplace. ARS scientists and companies work together to develop a research plan that is consistent with the agency’s mission. Under a CRADA, ARS scientists collaborate with private firms to help commercialize the technologies developed. A CRADA allows the company the first right to negotiate an exclusive license to any inventions that emerge under the agreement.

    The objective of the CRADA is to expedite federal research activities to the private sector to enhance global and domestic competitiveness.

    ARS has seven-geographically based Technology Transfer Coordinators that negotiate CRADA agreements. For more information about CRADAs contact one of our Technology Transfer Coordinators.

    Material Transfer Agreements

    Scientists use Material Transfer Agreements (MTAs) when they want to provide material to someone outside of ARS, but also want to maintain control over the material, and avoid public disclosure.

    MTAs are also used to bring in material to ARS from outside parties for research purposes. This agreement states specifically what the material is, what it can be used for, restricts giving it to a third party without permission, and prohibits commercial use of the material. All MTAs should be review by an ARS Technology Transfer Coordinator (TTC).

    A generic MTA form can be obtained from a TTC, or can be downloaded from this site (located on the left-hand side of this page under Generic Forms).

    Confidentiality Agreements

    In many cases it is necessary for ARS to share certain confidential information with a company to determine if there is sufficient mutual interest to proceed with either a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) and/or a patent license. A Confidentiality Agreement is used to ensure that a company will not disclose confidential information to anyone else or use the information for any other purposes than determining if sufficient mutual interest exists to proceed with the development of CRADA or patent license.

    In most cases, a Confidentiality Agreement with a company can be entered into by the ARS scientist and the respective company official. In other cases, it may be necessary for the ARS Technology Transfer Coordinator or Patent Licensing official to enter into a confidentiality agreement. A Confidentiality Agreement between ARS and the private sector remains in effect for two years, unless it is superseded by the confidentiality terms found in a CRADA and/or Patent License.

    A Confidentiality Agreement can be obtained from an ARS Technology Transfer Coordinator. Specific terms of Confidentiality Agreements are detailed in several generic forms.

    Memorandums of Understanding

    In some cases, it may be more advantageous for a company to enter a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with ARS. MOU’s are broad agreements that require a mutual interest in objectives by both parties. These agreements do not require mutual contributions of personal or financial resources by either party. An MOU is essentially an agreement to coordinate activities and to outline mutually acceptable goals and procedures, leading to mutual decisions. Transfer of resources (money, people etc.) is NOT done with an MOU.

    There are five types of MOUs that can be exercised in ARS to fit a specific need.

    1. A Master MOU is an agreement between ARS and another party or parties covering a broad area of cooperative work. A Master MOU may be entered into with any responsible party. It is used to set forth general principles of coordination, describe mutual needs in broad language, identify resource contributions and state responsibilities.
    2. A Supplement to the Master MOU is an agreement among the parties to the Master MOU describing in detail a particular program or project. The program or project must be within the scope of the Master MOU.
    3. An Individual MOU is an agreement between ARS and another party or parties describing a cooperative program or project. It can be used with an individual, public or private organization, Federal Agency, or other single or multiple parties. It is typically used when there is not a Master MOU to supplement.
    4. A Standard MOU is an agreement between ARS and another party similar to an Individual MOU, but different in that the agreement is reduced to an approved format with blanks to be filled.
    5. A Cooperative Research and Development MOU is an agreement between ARS and another party to conduct cooperative technology transfer activities pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 3710A.

    To find out what type of MOU will fit your situation, contact the Technology Transfer Coordinator responsible for the ARS laboratory location of your interest.

    Trust Fund and Reimbursable Cooperative Agreements

    In some cases it may be advantageous for companies to take advantage of Trust Fund or Reimbursable Cooperative Agreements with ARS to directly support an ARS project or program.

    In general, a Trust Fund Cooperative Agreement involves cooperative research between ARS and another party where ARS is paid in advance to conduct research. This agreement may also seek the private sector partner to share in the cost of a research project conducted by ARS. The agreement can also be used the allow private sector partners the use of laboratory facilities, which in some cases may require a formal lease.

    A Reimbursable Cooperative Agreement is similar to a Trust Fund in arrears. The difference, however, requires the private sector partner to pay ARS. In each agreement, representatives from the private sector partner and ARS should be actively engaged in the cooperative effort and mutually contribute resources to the research effort. Mutual interest in the agreement’s objectives should also be specifically stated.

    The following criteria is used to determine when to use a trust fund or reimbursable cooperative agreement:

    Trust Fund Cooperative Agreement

    • The relationship is with an individual or for-profit organization
    • ARS will hire a post-doc or temporary/term employee(s) or purchase major equipment or supplies necessary to conduct the research work. Under these circumstances, ARS requires all funds up front to pay salary costs before making a commitment to hire personnel or prior to incurring costs for purchasing equipment or supplies.
    • ARS requires payment in advance for work to be performed. An annual advance payment schedule should be included in the agreement.

    Reimbursable Cooperative Agreement

    • ARS has an ongoing, long-term relationship with the cooperator, such as a specific State or non-profit organization.
    • The working relationship provides a pretty good idea that the organization is reliable and support will be forthcoming.
    • To determine if a Trust Fund Cooperative Agreement or Reimbursable Cooperative Agreement will fit your situation, contact the regional Technology Transfer Coordinator.

    Editors Note: We hope you get the full understanding and ramifications of what is going on here. GFN is again confidant you will.


    USSA Files Complaint with Postal Service Regarding Anti-Dove Hunting Stamps

    (Columbus) - The U.S. Sportsmen’s Alliance has filed a complaint with the U.S. Postmaster General in regards to the sale of postage stamps which support and raise money for an initiative to ban dove hunting in Michigan.

    The organization is exploring whether or not is will pursue legal action in the matter.

    The stamps which were available for purchase at www.zazzle.com/JoyceJanicki since March, have been removed from the website.

    Each of the nine stamps featured images of mourning doves and the slogan “Protect Michigan Mourning Doves

    According to a posting that appeared until today on the Zazzle website, “Any profit gained from the sale of these stamps will go towards protecting Michigan's ‘Official Bird of Peace’ the Mourning Dove.” It is not known how much money the sale of the stamps may have raised to support the dove hunting ban.

    In November of this year, Michigan citizens will vote on whether or not to continue dove hunting in their state.

    The Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) is the leading contributor to the Committee to Restore the Dove Shooting Ban, the organization which spearheaded the movement to have the dove hunting ban placed on the November ballot and to which the creator of the offensive stamps belongs.

    Sale of customized postage stamps, which may feature everything from baby photos to advertising, began earlier this year after Congress amended an 1872 law that forbade advertisements on U.S. currency, including postage stamps. The U.S. Postal Service (USPS) began a one year trial program allowing Zazzle and two other companies to sell the customized stamps.

    In April, the U.S. Sportsmen’s Alliance (USSA) alerted sportsmen about this program when it was discovered that the HSUS was profiting from the sale of postage stamps featuring anti-animal use rhetoric.

    The USSA was alerted to the Michigan dove issue stamps by members of the Washington State Bowhunters Association.

    The U.S. Sportsmen’s Alliance protects the rights of hunters, anglers and trappers in the courts, legislatures, at the ballot, in Congress and through public education programs. For more information about the U.S. Sportsmen’s Alliance and its work, call (614) 888-4868 or visit its website, www.ussportsmen.org.

    Contact:

    Dale Miles (614) 888-4868 ext. 226


    Action You Can Take

    On August 23rd in Kansas City Missouri, the NIAA will be having USDA Secretary of Agriculture Mike Johanns giving the keynote address at their 2006 ID EXPO at the Crown Westin Plaza, 1 East Pershing Road, Kansas City, Missouri 64108. Also on that day Dr. Mary Zanoni will be participating in a panel discussion representing those of us opposed to the NAIS. Click Here for the Crown Westin Website.

    There will be a peaceful protest against the NAIS going on outside of the meeting all day on the 23rd. We need people to show up and allow themselves to be viewed by those who would push this system upon us without our consent.

    Already there have millions if not billions of federal dollars (yours!) spent to bring this plan to fruition. The USDA claims that 86 million has been spent on it, but that only covers the amounts given to States to set up databases and begin accepting premises registrations. It fails to include at least 39 pilot projects and grants to businesses providing the technology and trials within such groups as 4H; nor does it cover the amounts paid to employees and representatives of the USDA in promulgating and developing the plan.

    This is a wonderful opportunity to get your voice heard and to show those wishing to bring this about that you are willing to stand strongly against it. Please contact Doreen Hannes via email to confirm your attendance and willingness to participate in this event. We don’t have much time.

    Sue Karber, Oklahoma

    If you put someone down then put them down on your prayer list.

    No to NAIS


    The Granny Warriors

    Please remember to visit GFN's 'quick links'. We are pleased to help support the "Granny Warriors". They are taking action that only Grannys can do. We hope the Members of GFN will show them the same support our staff does.


    Disclaimer

    This site does not advocate or endorse any activities that are in violation of Federal, State, or Local laws.


    Title 17 U.S.C. section 107

    In compliance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, GFN is distributed free, without profit or payment, for non- profit research and educational purposes only.


    Quick Links...

    Jim Beers Common Sense

    The U.S. Sportsmen's Alliance

    National Rifle Association

    National Animal Interest Alliance

    PETA Kills Animals

    Ted Nugent

    The Daily Judge

    The Granny Warriors

    PeTA Sucks

    Target Of Opportunity

    Animal Scam

    The GameFowl News Website

    Donate To GameFowl News



    Join our mailing list!