|
Greetings GameFowl News Members!
GFN welcomes writers and submissions of news you
want to see in GFN. If you are submitting an article
from a news source you must provide the URL link.
Please submit to
GFN@nethere.com Also, we cannot and will not
open attachments unless you contact us first and tell
us you are sending one.
“The Humane Society should be worried about
protecting animals from cruelty. It’s not doing
that. The place is all about power and money.”
HSUS consultant and former HSUS Chief Investigator
Robert Baker, in U.S. News & World Report (October
2, 1995)
Make sure you have your seat belts on and lets
proceed.
| Folks, You Need To Hear This... |
 |
|
Shelton Walden is the host, producer and creator of
Walden's Pond. Please click on the URL link below,
turn on your speakers, and scroll to !0/!7/06 on the
left hand side. Then click on that date, it's free
you cheap skates. Let it down load and listen.
|
| Humane Society Holds Microchip ID Clinic for Pets |
 |
|
The Humane Society of Central Oregon is holding a
microchip identification clinic on Friday, October
27th and Saturday, October 28th from 10:00 am to
3:00 pm. The purpose of the clinic is to highlight
the importance of identification on family pets.
Microchip implants, including registration will be
provided for only $10 at the Bend animal shelter.
|
| Letters To The Editor |
 |
|
MARCH ON WASHINGTON
Ok people, I'll lay it on the line. I work at
Wal-Mart. I don't have a car that runs or even a
driver's license at the present time. I've never
been arrested, or even close. I've never smoked
anything including a peace pipe. I've never done
drugs of any kind, and never will. I don't judge
people that have done any of this. I live paycheck
to paycheck and have for years. I walk everywhere I
go. I have a week's vacation to burn before March,
and if we could organize a march on Washington, I'll
damned well use it. (If I could get a ride.
Washington's a long walk from Oklahoma.) It doesn't
matter when it would take place, if I can get a
ride, I'll be there. How many other people would be
willing to give up one vacation, one week of their
life, to save our sport? No more bitching about what
we SHOULD DO. Did you know that they're even trying
to stop people from selling or buying cockfighting
books or paraphernalia on Ebay? Isn't anyone else as
sick as I am about the BS that people like Hulk
Hogan and others are throwing out there? And now
they want the FBI involved in hunting us down?
Aren't you sick and tired of being trampled under
the HSUS's hoofs?
WE ARE AMERICANS!!!!! I'm tired of being
called a criminal, lowlife, deviant, and a hundred
other names that the HSUS and those who side with
them use. Is anyone else as tired of it as I am?
Does anybody out there know any Capitol Hill
lobbyists or Senators we could get to help organize
a march on Washington? Does anybody out there know
anything about organizing this sort of thing? Does
anybody out there know anybody in the entertainment
or filmmaking fields that would help? Do we have
enough people who would take part and make our
voices heard once and for all? Everyone who
subscribes to any magazine dealing with Fishing,
Hunting, Cockfighting, and any other sport involving
animals should be as sick of this as I am. I don't
want to lose this sport because there weren't enough
people with the balls to stand with me. I can't do
it alone. We owe it to our children and all our
descendants to save our sport before it's too late.
We need powerful people behind us. When I think of a
future without gamefowl, where you can't hunt, fish
or even take pictures of wildlife because it
violates the animal's privacy, it's a sad and empty
place. When I think of the possibility that our
sport will die, that we will be felons just for
raising our beautiful fowl, or having our Gamecocks,
Grit and Steels, Feathered Warriors, Field and
Streams, Outdoor Life's, or National Geographic's in
our homes, not to mention gaffs, slashers, fishing
hooks, any firearm at all, or any bowhunting
memorabilia, I choke up. This is what staying
"underground" has earned cockfighters and gamefowl
lovers. The terrorists won't stop there. The day is
coming when eating chicken or any animal will be
frowned upon if these fanatic terrorists like the
HSUS aren't stopped. There's no mistake about it
people, this is quickly becoming something from
"1984". Big Brother is definitely watching! This
nation is becoming a police state and it's only
going to get worse if we let it. It's like a
prizefighter that won't fight back, but just covers
up, hoping to outlast his opponent. The only problem
is, that his opponent is constantly hammering him,
and when the dummy sees an opening, he may be too
battered to score effectively. Is that us? Have we
lost the will or strength to fight back? The courage
to fight back? Animal rights will one day, not far
away, translate into no pets at all, no scientific
experiments on animals, no zoos, no aquariums,
safari parks, and the list goes on and on. Hunters
and fishermen will be the next major targets when
and if cockfighting and all things related are
outlawed once and for all. Then, a lot of them will
wish that they'd done more to help cockfighters when
we needed their support.
Just off the tops of your heads, how many kennel
clubs or horse stables do you think exist in this
country? How many people raise and sell registered
dogs or horses, or any other animal? These people
all think that they are safe and unassailable now.
That won't be the situation forever. Not even for
another decade. The public MUST BE EDUCATED!!! The
HSUS, PETA and all other animal rights fanatics must
be exposed for the twisted terrorists that they are.
It must happen NOW. Religious groups especially,
need to step forward and denounce the wrongdoing of
these terrorist groups. If they claim to be
Christian, then endorsing animal rights makes them
true hypocrites'. It is spelled out in Genesis.
Consult your Bible.
TO BE CONTINUED Doug U.
Dear Doug,
It has been the long standing position of GFN that
the "ART's" (Animal Rights Terrorists) have an
agenda. They first went after the Cockfighters, easy
prey. However and moreover, now they will stop at
nothing. You Hunters and Fisherman need to take your
heads out of your Gluteus Maximums. The ART's are
coming for you next.
|
| Abduction or assistance? PETA Members Are In Trouble, Accused of Stealing a Dog. |
 |
|
Southampton County detectives are investigating a
dognapping. They say PETA members abducted a Walker
Hound Wednesday at about 10 in the morning.
The hounds are popular for tracking foxes and deer.
And in Southampton County, hunters often let these
dogs roam free for hours to sniff out the prey.
|
| Editors Note: How Illegal Search and Seizure Became Legal. |
 |
|
From The Editors Desk:GFN never makes
mistakes. We publish the truth, "whether you like it
or not". The truth is, well, your "editor" of GFN
should be fired. The idiot, "editor", screwed up.
The wanker allowed the pic (photo) to supersede the
text of the first few lines, of text, in this
article below. So, we at 'Team GFN' have tied up the
"editor" and locked him in the broom
closet. The real "powers that be" behind the
scenes' are the staff of GFN and we're taking over,
until the "editor" breaks lose from his current
involuntary confinement. In this issue of GFN
we have decided to do a second run of the article
below by Sue Beaulieu. The reason for this is
because the "EDITOR" screwed up in the last issue,
that's why he's bound and gagged back in the "Broom
Closet". Enjoy this issue of GFN...
by Sue
Beaulieu -
GameFowl News Staff Writer
The First Step: Creating an Animal Cruelty
Case
A Federal Agency and/or Animal Control/Humane
Society/SPCA will often “create” cruelty charges that
do not exist. Is there a need for genuine animal
welfare? Of Course! Should some animals be taken
from unhealthy or abusive situations? Yes!
However, in our less than ideal world, sometimes
other factors motivate law enforcement to take
unnecessary actions. In many cases, misconceptions
occur based on hearsay or unreliable and vengeful
complaints which often remain anonymous. Ulterior
motives, jealousy and the opportunity to receive
another person’s animals for free do happen.
Unscrupulous people use animal law enforcement
officers to achieve these goals.
Whenever animal cruelty charges are alleged,
cross reporting often follows. Many states have
cross
reporting laws that link animal cruelty, child abuse
and elder neglect. Animal control officers are
taught
over and over again that if a person abuses animals,
they will most likely abuse children and the elderly.
Be wary when you read accounts of animals that
were seized and children that were taken to child
protective services. There is usually much more to
the story. The media jumps on these sensationalized
stories. Like unreliable gossip, bad news sells papers
and travels fast.
Animals can be seized – with or without a search
warrant, depending on the circumstances. Probable cause has been
broadened over the past two
decades and can include nearly anything.
Once seized, the animals are taken to the
local “holding facility” [I first typed hoarding
facility
by accident, but perhaps that is a good term for
them after all.] The animals may be adopted for a
fee, or farmed out to rescues, sanctuaries or zoos.
Some may be euthanized and many die due to
substandard care by individuals who are unqualified
to keep them.
Forfeiture hearings nearly always occur
before
formal
criminal charges are filed. In the meantime, the
animals languish in unfamiliar surroundings. They
have suffered undue stress and radical changes in
diet. Generally, the veterinarians are overworked and
most are not exotic specialists. Animals get sick,
pick up diseases and germs from the shelter and
sometimes die.
The holding facility charges a daily boarding fee
for
each animal. They bill for as many vet visits and
tests as possible, whether they are necessary or
not. These charges add up and someone must pay.
Sometimes the city, which contracts with the official
shelter, is held responsible for the exorbitant
fees. If
the original owner is fortunate enough to win back
custody of their own animals, they will be charged for
boarding, vet bills and food.
How would you feel if someone came into
your
house
while you were gone and took your children and
animals from you for no reason and held them for
ransom? This is a good analogy of how the
system works. People must pay the “legal
thieves” to get
back what should have never been taken from them
to begin with. People have to go through the court
system to try and get their children and animals
back. Attorney’s fees are high and add up quickly.
The accused are considered guilty until they prove
themselves innocent and at a great financial and
emotional cost, I might add.
Most attorneys for the defendants know very
little
about animal cruelty law, how this system operates
or what
motivates it. They do not realize the full force and
effect it has on people’s lives or how devastating the
experience is. Generally, these issues are not given
the serious consideration they deserve.
Victims of the “animal cruelty control” system are
forced to plea bargain because they have already
paid thousands of dollars in lawyers fees and cannot
afford additional boarding and vet fees which have
accrued. The animals are declared forfeit, and
adopted for a fee, euthanized or farmed out to other
rescues and shelters. The defendants just want the
entire episode over with.
The official shelter profits from the boarding fees
and
fines. This creates an incentive to encourage
animal
cruelty cases. Of course, this is a conflict of
interest
and it is frightening to all animal owners, because
what could happen to one person could happen to
any of us.
To add insult to injury, the laws, statutes and
ordinances that set up this very system were
introduced by the animal control/shelter network that
has most to gain from the laws. Seldom is there
input from the animal owner who will be affected by
these laws. They are busy caring for their animals
and families. On the other hand, the HSUS, SPCA
and other animal rights organizations are very
politically active in all levels of our government.
They
have the time and infrastructure in place to slowly
but surely bring an end to all animal ownership in this
country.
The prosecution’s failure to bring timely formal
charges is part of the strategy. Law enforcement,
animal control or local humane agencies do not want
their cozy little scam exposed. They count on their
victims’ confusion and emotional reactions. They
count on the fact that many attorneys in the past
have not taken these cases seriously. They drag out
the procedure as long as possible, while daily charges
and fees add up. They expect defendants to buckle
under the financial and emotional pressure.
Ironically, the animals often endure
genuine “animal
cruelty” from the hands of those who claim to be
their saviors. The
shelters, rescues and sanctuaries should be governed
by the same laws they impose on others. Not all
shelters are improperly administered –
but far too many are. Sometimes problems are
exposed and investigated and have resulted in
improvements. Sometimes not. In the meantime, it
is a win-win situation for the prosecution. If the
animals remain healthy, they take credit. If the
animals deteriorate, they can blame it on the
defendant.
If a defendant does decide to “fight city hall” and
demands a jury trial, the defendant’s attorney often
has a very difficult time acquiring discovery
documents. These would include any formal
complaints which triggered the search and seizure,
copies of search warrants, photos, videos and the
very important chain of custody. Proper procedure
during any seizure includes making a detailed list of
the animals taken. Ideally this document should
contain detailed notes about each animal’s condition,
subsequent vet care and treatment while they are in
animal control’s custody, where the animals go if they
leave the holding facility and cause of death if
applicable. Obtaining each of these items comes at a
price to the defendant.
Few people have the time, energy or money to
take a
case this far, so the animal control prosecution often
doesn’t bother to keep detailed records. The
prosecution has no desire to have their unethical
strategy exposed for public record. If the case goes
this far, they will opt for a settlement, but no
settlement can undo the damage that has already
been done to the defendant(s).
|
| The Granny Warriors |
 |
|
Please remember to visit GFN's 'quick links'. We are
pleased to help support the "Granny Warriors". They
are taking action that only Grannys can do. We hope
the Members of GFN will show them the same support
our staff does.
|
| Disclaimer |
 |
|
This site does not advocate or endorse any activities
that are in violation of Federal, State, or Local laws.
|
| Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 |
 |
|
In compliance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, GFN is
distributed free, without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research and educational purposes.
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of
their respective owner.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains
copyrighted material the use of which has not always
been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.
We are making such material available in our efforts
to advance understanding of environmental,
political, human rights, economic, democracy,
scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We
believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such
copyrighted material as provided for in section 107
of the US Copyright Law.
|
|
Featured Article |
|
|
|
What Is The Humane Society of the United
States?by Christopher Aust, August 2004
I was rather amazed at the number of people who
wrote to me about my opinions regarding the Humane
Society of the United States (HSUS) when I did my
last few articles. Then again, maybe I shouldn't be.
Before about two weeks ago, I myself was rather
ignorant as to the real goals of HSUS, and where
their, (actually your) money goes. As I always do
though, I decided to edumcate myself about them.
I also conducted a poll of 100 average people. Just
the average Joe in the street. 94% of the people
thought HSUS ran the local shelters in their
community. 4% knew about their other programs and
the remaining 2% had no idea who they were. Of the
94% all said they would donate to HSUS based on what
they knew about them. I'm betting HSUS is banking,
literally, on these types of individuals.I also
went online and found some rather interesting, at
times quite scary, information on several web sites.
I would have interviewed a HSUS representative, but
after last week's newsletter, I got an email from
one that was little more than hate mail and very
offensive! Founders Coleman
Burke, then president of the American Bible Society,
Cleveland Amory and Helen Jones, founded HSUS in
1954. As far as I have been able to tell, Mr. Burke
served as their President until 1970 when John Hoyt,
a Presbyterian minister, took over as President and
CEO until 1996. Until just a few months ago, the
President and CEO was Paul Irwin, a Methodist
minister. The current CEO and President is Wayne
Pacelle who admittedly has had ties with some
radical (and I mean radical) animal rights groups in
the past. Now, is it important I mention the
religious background? Maybe and maybe not. What I
noticed though is the organization, at least to me,
has an evangelical feel. Is this a bad thing? No. I
don't see why unless you are running the finances in
a manner similar to Jim and Tammie Faye Baker! That
sure is the way it looks to me. Officers
and Directors HSUS is an organization with
their primary focus being animals. As I reviewed the
names and titles of the Board Officers and
Directors, I found it curious they had no DVM's
(vets) on either. They have three MDs', three PhDs'
and six attorneys. Am I the only one that finds this
odd? Plenty of lawyers, but no vet. Hmmm? Maybe it's
just a typo.
Comparative Financial Operations Report
When I conducted my interview with Kathy Bauch a few
weeks ago, she refused to answer any questions
regarding HSUS' finances for a "newsletter." She did
offer to send me their 2003 financials though. This
is what they send whenever someone has questions
about their finances. As I mentioned last week, if
it was similar to what they have online, it would be
vague and difficult to decipher. What I got was much
more. What I received is their 2003 Annual
Report. It is a twenty-one page "report" that was
obviously very expensive to print. Tucked way in the
back is exactly what I expected. A vague and
difficult to read one page financial report. The
rest appears to me to be a very expensive sales
letter and nothing more, complete with a postage
paid envelope to send in your donation.
Now you might say, "So what? They have to promote
themselves." I agree. However, this publication has
six pages of calendar quality photos of nothing but
animals. Two and a half pages of self-glorifying
articles from HSUS staff, none of which was
necessary. How much donor money could have been
saved by deleting this junk from the thousands and
thousands of these reports they printed?According
to the Comparative Financial Operations Report for
2003, the HSUS has $116,205,882.00 in total
liability and net assets. Over $5,000,000 of that is
in cash and cash equivalents, and another nearly
five and a half million in receivables. They also
have nearly $93,000,000 in market value investments.
Not too bad. In 2003, in revenue, additions
and transfers, HSUS made $76,923,670. Of that
amount, sheltering programs received $10,551,527 and
it was shared with animal habitat and wildlife
programs. Now, assuming it was an even split,
sheltering programs received $3,517,175.66 Now
that's a lot of money, but not when you consider a
good sized shelter can cost hundreds of thousands of
dollars a year to run, three million is really a
drop in the bucket. They spent $21,145,769.00 in
fundraising and membership development. Six times
what they put into their shelter programs, which is
what most people I talked to think HSUS does with
the money donated to them. Providing Help
or Selling It I'm not sure what they spent
the money on for their shelter programs, but I will
assure you they didn't fund any shelters. In fact,
they charge shelters and Animal Control offices for
their assistance and instructional material. I have
been able to find little and or nothing HSUS doesn't
charge for when it comes to helping a shelter and
their educational programs. For instance, lets
say you or your town runs an animal shelter that is
struggling for one reason or another, which most
are, HSUS is ready to come in and help. For between
$4000.00 and $20,000.00 they will send their experts
to your shelter through their Animal Services
Consultation Program. The fee depends on the size of
the agency and the complexity of its programs,
charged on a sliding scale based on your agency's
resources. In other words, the more you have, the
more they'll take.
Youth ProgramsNow, lets go back to our
youth. You're in middle or high school and want to
start a club to promote rescue and do things to help
companion animals. HSUS can help you with that, too.
Just go to humaneteen.org. There you can buy a
package full of all kinds of propaganda and learn to
be a full-fledged animal activist. They will sell
your child a club starter kit for $22.00 and then
give activity suggestions like their "Fight Fur"
program. Here they encourage kids to make
flyers and hand them out in front of businesses to
protest against shoppers buying fur. HSUS will also
give your child cards to distribute at such events.
They'll show your child pictures of dead animals in
traps and direct them to other sites where they can
see pictures of hunters beating seals over the head.
They will also promote vegen/vegetarian
lifestyles to your child. Just go to the message
board for kids and you can read how many of the kids
are distressed, after reading the material HSUS SOLD
them, because their parents will not let them go
vegen. You will also see posts promoting PETA!
Now I want to be fair here. They do have some
decent material that is age appropriate and
educational in nature. I think it's overpriced; for
instance, your child can rent a video to show their
class for $25.00, but some of it is good material.
However, there is little promoting appropriate
training, grooming or responsible ownership of
companion animals. It seems to me the whole focus is
turning our children into activists, vegens and
extremists. Now if I want my child to be a
vegen, or an activist, I will make that decision and
not HSUS. Our kids have enough on their plate
without having to be weighed down with this
information or agenda. Additionally, kids are kids
and don't always make appropriate decisions. When
dealing with complex issues like activism and
protesting, it would be easy for them to get into
trouble or hurt. Doesn't PETA target children too?
Ethical Financial Practices Let's get back
to the money: Former President John Hoyt once
instructed his members on becoming more humane: "We
begin, I suggest, by living more simply, more
sparingly." Let's see how he did. He made around
$200,000.00 in the late 1980's running HSUS. In
1986, HSUS bought his house in Maryland for $310,000
and allowed him and his family to live there, free
of rent, until 1992. When he retired as CEO, HSUS
gave him a $1,000,000.00 bonus. Paul Irwin,
another former President, while making $300,000.00
from HSUS, was given an $85,000.00 interest free
loan to renovate his cabin in Maine. The cabin was
held in trust by HSUS, however his family continued
to use it until he died. This is just the tip of the
iceberg. Makes me wonder.
Guilty by AssociationLet's look at some of
HSUS' associations: In April of 2000 HSUS sent
J.P. Goodwin as its emissary on an anti-fur mission
to China. Goodwin is not just any animal rights
zealot, he was an avowed member of Animal Liberation
Front (ALF), a group once called one of the biggest
domestic terrorist organizations by the FBI. He had
been convicted for vandalism of several fur
retailers and their property. Less than a year
later, he was formerly identified as a HSUS
legislative staff member.
Then, there is the PETA connection..HSUS
has repeatedly hired PETA employees in their
organization. Their head of investigations, several
investigators, a computer programmer, just to name a
few. Sorry folks, my opinion is, once a terrorist,
always a terrorist. When HSUS hires these people,
they appear to support the crimes these individuals
may have been involved in. In 2003, HSUS VP Martin
Stephens was asked to recommend three people to
serve on an EPA "pollution prevention and toxics"
panel. Two of his three choices were PETA
employees. All Talk and No Action
While HSUS will admit they don't run or fund
any shelters, you usually find it at the bottom of
the page or tucked away somewhere near the end of a
statement. As I mentioned before, they don't put
their money where their mouth is. Get this.. In
1995, when the Washington DC animal shelter was
going to have to close due to a budget shortfall,
HSUS (based in DC) offered to build and operate a DC
shelter at its own expense to serve as a national
model. There were, of course, conditions. HSUS
wanted the city to give it 3-5 acres of land and tax
exempt status for all of its real estate holdings in
the District of Columbia. Remember, they buy some
executives homes to live in among other property
holdings. The DC government offered a
long-term lease but HSUS refused to proceed unless
it would "own absolutely" the land. The district
declined, and the only HSUS funded animal shelter
never materialized. HSUS, who makes and has
enough money to fund a shelter in every state, as
well as subsidize spay/neuter programs, declined to
help the dogs in its own back yard. Why? Money is
all I can think of. Perhaps they were afraid they
would soil their Armani suits by actually working
with a dog.
The New CEO Rather than go on a tirade
about the new President and CEO of HSUS, I have put
some quotes from him below. Read them, and you
decide. "I think they wanted the aggressive
approach," he says. "They wanted someone who was
going to think things up. And they got him." June
2004, Washington Post when asked about his selection
as CEO. "We have no problem with the
extinction of domestic animals. They are creations
of human selective breeding." Quoted in Animal
People, May, 1993
OverviewI could go on for days about HSUS,
but I will stop here. In my opinion, they are little
more than an organization whose main agenda is
filling the coffers and pushing an extremist agenda
through misinformation and exploitation. Again, my
opinion, they have done nothing but profit from the
contributions of people who don't know any better. I
have tried to see it otherwise, I simply
can't. I highly recommend you go to activistcash.com
and see what they have there about HSUS and their
connection with PETA. There are several other sites
I found interesting, as well as many stories about
HSUS in the archive of the Washington Post.
Would I give anything to the Humane Society of the
United States? Yes I would. A pooper-scooper, they
can use to go clean my yard. At least then we would
know they actually have done something for a dog
this year.
|
|