$Account.OrganizationName
The GameFowl News
October 27, 2006

Greetings GameFowl News Members!

GFN welcomes writers and submissions of news you want to see in GFN. If you are submitting an article from a news source you must provide the URL link. Please submit to GFN@nethere.com Also, we cannot and will not open attachments unless you contact us first and tell us you are sending one.

“The Humane Society should be worried about protecting animals from cruelty. It’s not doing that. The place is all about power and money.” HSUS consultant and former HSUS Chief Investigator Robert Baker, in U.S. News & World Report (October 2, 1995)

Make sure you have your seat belts on and lets proceed.

In this issue
  • Featured Article
  • Folks, You Need To Hear This...
  • Humane Society Holds Microchip ID Clinic for Pets
  • Letters To The Editor
  • Abduction or assistance? PETA Members Are In Trouble, Accused of Stealing a Dog.
  • Editors Note: How Illegal Search and Seizure Became Legal.
  • The Hidden Enemy
  • The Granny Warriors
  • Disclaimer
  • Title 17 U.S.C. section 107

  • Folks, You Need To Hear This...

    Shelton Walden is the host, producer and creator of Walden's Pond. Please click on the URL link below, turn on your speakers, and scroll to !0/!7/06 on the left hand side. Then click on that date, it's free you cheap skates. Let it down load and listen.


    Humane Society Holds Microchip ID Clinic for Pets

    The Humane Society of Central Oregon is holding a microchip identification clinic on Friday, October 27th and Saturday, October 28th from 10:00 am to 3:00 pm. The purpose of the clinic is to highlight the importance of identification on family pets. Microchip implants, including registration will be provided for only $10 at the Bend animal shelter.


    Letters To The Editor

    MARCH ON WASHINGTON

    Ok people, I'll lay it on the line. I work at Wal-Mart. I don't have a car that runs or even a driver's license at the present time. I've never been arrested, or even close. I've never smoked anything including a peace pipe. I've never done drugs of any kind, and never will. I don't judge people that have done any of this. I live paycheck to paycheck and have for years. I walk everywhere I go. I have a week's vacation to burn before March, and if we could organize a march on Washington, I'll damned well use it. (If I could get a ride. Washington's a long walk from Oklahoma.) It doesn't matter when it would take place, if I can get a ride, I'll be there. How many other people would be willing to give up one vacation, one week of their life, to save our sport? No more bitching about what we SHOULD DO. Did you know that they're even trying to stop people from selling or buying cockfighting books or paraphernalia on Ebay? Isn't anyone else as sick as I am about the BS that people like Hulk Hogan and others are throwing out there? And now they want the FBI involved in hunting us down? Aren't you sick and tired of being trampled under the HSUS's hoofs?

    WE ARE AMERICANS!!!!!

    I'm tired of being called a criminal, lowlife, deviant, and a hundred other names that the HSUS and those who side with them use. Is anyone else as tired of it as I am? Does anybody out there know any Capitol Hill lobbyists or Senators we could get to help organize a march on Washington? Does anybody out there know anything about organizing this sort of thing? Does anybody out there know anybody in the entertainment or filmmaking fields that would help? Do we have enough people who would take part and make our voices heard once and for all? Everyone who subscribes to any magazine dealing with Fishing, Hunting, Cockfighting, and any other sport involving animals should be as sick of this as I am. I don't want to lose this sport because there weren't enough people with the balls to stand with me. I can't do it alone. We owe it to our children and all our descendants to save our sport before it's too late. We need powerful people behind us. When I think of a future without gamefowl, where you can't hunt, fish or even take pictures of wildlife because it violates the animal's privacy, it's a sad and empty place. When I think of the possibility that our sport will die, that we will be felons just for raising our beautiful fowl, or having our Gamecocks, Grit and Steels, Feathered Warriors, Field and Streams, Outdoor Life's, or National Geographic's in our homes, not to mention gaffs, slashers, fishing hooks, any firearm at all, or any bowhunting memorabilia, I choke up.

    This is what staying "underground" has earned cockfighters and gamefowl lovers. The terrorists won't stop there. The day is coming when eating chicken or any animal will be frowned upon if these fanatic terrorists like the HSUS aren't stopped. There's no mistake about it people, this is quickly becoming something from "1984". Big Brother is definitely watching! This nation is becoming a police state and it's only going to get worse if we let it. It's like a prizefighter that won't fight back, but just covers up, hoping to outlast his opponent. The only problem is, that his opponent is constantly hammering him, and when the dummy sees an opening, he may be too battered to score effectively. Is that us? Have we lost the will or strength to fight back? The courage to fight back? Animal rights will one day, not far away, translate into no pets at all, no scientific experiments on animals, no zoos, no aquariums, safari parks, and the list goes on and on. Hunters and fishermen will be the next major targets when and if cockfighting and all things related are outlawed once and for all. Then, a lot of them will wish that they'd done more to help cockfighters when we needed their support.

    Just off the tops of your heads, how many kennel clubs or horse stables do you think exist in this country? How many people raise and sell registered dogs or horses, or any other animal? These people all think that they are safe and unassailable now. That won't be the situation forever. Not even for another decade. The public MUST BE EDUCATED!!! The HSUS, PETA and all other animal rights fanatics must be exposed for the twisted terrorists that they are. It must happen NOW. Religious groups especially, need to step forward and denounce the wrongdoing of these terrorist groups. If they claim to be Christian, then endorsing animal rights makes them true hypocrites'. It is spelled out in Genesis. Consult your Bible.

    TO BE CONTINUED

    Doug U.

    Dear Doug,

    It has been the long standing position of GFN that the "ART's" (Animal Rights Terrorists) have an agenda. They first went after the Cockfighters, easy prey. However and moreover, now they will stop at nothing. You Hunters and Fisherman need to take your heads out of your Gluteus Maximums. The ART's are coming for you next.


    Abduction or assistance? PETA Members Are In Trouble, Accused of Stealing a Dog.

    Southampton County detectives are investigating a dognapping. They say PETA members abducted a Walker Hound Wednesday at about 10 in the morning.

    The hounds are popular for tracking foxes and deer. And in Southampton County, hunters often let these dogs roam free for hours to sniff out the prey.


    Editors Note: How Illegal Search and Seizure Became Legal.

    From The Editors Desk:

    GFN never makes mistakes. We publish the truth, "whether you like it or not". The truth is, well, your "editor" of GFN should be fired. The idiot, "editor", screwed up. The wanker allowed the pic (photo) to supersede the text of the first few lines, of text, in this article below. So, we at 'Team GFN' have tied up the "editor" and locked him in the broom closet.

    The real "powers that be" behind the scenes' are the staff of GFN and we're taking over, until the "editor" breaks lose from his current involuntary confinement.

    In this issue of GFN we have decided to do a second run of the article below by Sue Beaulieu. The reason for this is because the "EDITOR" screwed up in the last issue, that's why he's bound and gagged back in the "Broom Closet".

    Enjoy this issue of GFN...

    by Sue Beaulieu - GameFowl News Staff Writer

    The First Step: Creating an Animal Cruelty Case

    A Federal Agency and/or Animal Control/Humane Society/SPCA will often “create” cruelty charges that do not exist. Is there a need for genuine animal welfare? Of Course! Should some animals be taken from unhealthy or abusive situations? Yes!

    However, in our less than ideal world, sometimes other factors motivate law enforcement to take unnecessary actions. In many cases, misconceptions occur based on hearsay or unreliable and vengeful complaints which often remain anonymous. Ulterior motives, jealousy and the opportunity to receive another person’s animals for free do happen. Unscrupulous people use animal law enforcement officers to achieve these goals.

    Whenever animal cruelty charges are alleged, cross reporting often follows. Many states have cross reporting laws that link animal cruelty, child abuse and elder neglect. Animal control officers are taught over and over again that if a person abuses animals, they will most likely abuse children and the elderly. Be wary when you read accounts of animals that were seized and children that were taken to child protective services. There is usually much more to the story. The media jumps on these sensationalized stories. Like unreliable gossip, bad news sells papers and travels fast.

    Animals can be seized – with or without a search warrant, depending on the circumstances. Probable cause has been broadened over the past two decades and can include nearly anything.

    Once seized, the animals are taken to the local “holding facility” [I first typed hoarding facility by accident, but perhaps that is a good term for them after all.] The animals may be adopted for a fee, or farmed out to rescues, sanctuaries or zoos. Some may be euthanized and many die due to substandard care by individuals who are unqualified to keep them.

    Forfeiture hearings nearly always occur before formal criminal charges are filed. In the meantime, the animals languish in unfamiliar surroundings. They have suffered undue stress and radical changes in diet. Generally, the veterinarians are overworked and most are not exotic specialists. Animals get sick, pick up diseases and germs from the shelter and sometimes die.

    The holding facility charges a daily boarding fee for each animal. They bill for as many vet visits and tests as possible, whether they are necessary or not. These charges add up and someone must pay. Sometimes the city, which contracts with the official shelter, is held responsible for the exorbitant fees. If the original owner is fortunate enough to win back custody of their own animals, they will be charged for boarding, vet bills and food.

    How would you feel if someone came into your house while you were gone and took your children and animals from you for no reason and held them for ransom? This is a good analogy of how the system works. People must pay the “legal thieves” to get back what should have never been taken from them to begin with. People have to go through the court system to try and get their children and animals back. Attorney’s fees are high and add up quickly. The accused are considered guilty until they prove themselves innocent and at a great financial and emotional cost, I might add.

    Most attorneys for the defendants know very little about animal cruelty law, how this system operates or what motivates it. They do not realize the full force and effect it has on people’s lives or how devastating the experience is. Generally, these issues are not given the serious consideration they deserve.

    Victims of the “animal cruelty control” system are forced to plea bargain because they have already paid thousands of dollars in lawyers fees and cannot afford additional boarding and vet fees which have accrued. The animals are declared forfeit, and adopted for a fee, euthanized or farmed out to other rescues and shelters. The defendants just want the entire episode over with.

    The official shelter profits from the boarding fees and fines. This creates an incentive to encourage animal cruelty cases. Of course, this is a conflict of interest and it is frightening to all animal owners, because what could happen to one person could happen to any of us.

    To add insult to injury, the laws, statutes and ordinances that set up this very system were introduced by the animal control/shelter network that has most to gain from the laws. Seldom is there input from the animal owner who will be affected by these laws. They are busy caring for their animals and families. On the other hand, the HSUS, SPCA and other animal rights organizations are very politically active in all levels of our government. They have the time and infrastructure in place to slowly but surely bring an end to all animal ownership in this country.

    The prosecution’s failure to bring timely formal charges is part of the strategy. Law enforcement, animal control or local humane agencies do not want their cozy little scam exposed. They count on their victims’ confusion and emotional reactions. They count on the fact that many attorneys in the past have not taken these cases seriously. They drag out the procedure as long as possible, while daily charges and fees add up. They expect defendants to buckle under the financial and emotional pressure.

    Ironically, the animals often endure genuine “animal cruelty” from the hands of those who claim to be their saviors. The shelters, rescues and sanctuaries should be governed by the same laws they impose on others. Not all shelters are improperly administered – but far too many are. Sometimes problems are exposed and investigated and have resulted in improvements. Sometimes not. In the meantime, it is a win-win situation for the prosecution. If the animals remain healthy, they take credit. If the animals deteriorate, they can blame it on the defendant.

    If a defendant does decide to “fight city hall” and demands a jury trial, the defendant’s attorney often has a very difficult time acquiring discovery documents. These would include any formal complaints which triggered the search and seizure, copies of search warrants, photos, videos and the very important chain of custody. Proper procedure during any seizure includes making a detailed list of the animals taken. Ideally this document should contain detailed notes about each animal’s condition, subsequent vet care and treatment while they are in animal control’s custody, where the animals go if they leave the holding facility and cause of death if applicable. Obtaining each of these items comes at a price to the defendant.

    Few people have the time, energy or money to take a case this far, so the animal control prosecution often doesn’t bother to keep detailed records. The prosecution has no desire to have their unethical strategy exposed for public record. If the case goes this far, they will opt for a settlement, but no settlement can undo the damage that has already been done to the defendant(s).


    The Hidden Enemy

    GFN would like for its members to take a good hard look at "The Hidden Enemy". Please view the shows at the below links, make sure your speakers are turned on.

    Link number one (1) http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1106367485108444134

    Link number two (2) http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5138459987864678865

    Link number three (3) http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6594224679411781497

    Link number four (4) http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5373840108323090565

    Link number five (5) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pbrr7Sn4vF8


    The Granny Warriors

    Please remember to visit GFN's 'quick links'. We are pleased to help support the "Granny Warriors". They are taking action that only Grannys can do. We hope the Members of GFN will show them the same support our staff does.


    Disclaimer

    This site does not advocate or endorse any activities that are in violation of Federal, State, or Local laws.


    Title 17 U.S.C. section 107

    In compliance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, GFN is distributed free, without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

    All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.


    Featured Article
    We play for keeps

    What Is The Humane Society of the United States?

    by Christopher Aust, August 2004

    I was rather amazed at the number of people who wrote to me about my opinions regarding the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) when I did my last few articles. Then again, maybe I shouldn't be. Before about two weeks ago, I myself was rather ignorant as to the real goals of HSUS, and where their, (actually your) money goes. As I always do though, I decided to edumcate myself about them.

    I also conducted a poll of 100 average people. Just the average Joe in the street. 94% of the people thought HSUS ran the local shelters in their community. 4% knew about their other programs and the remaining 2% had no idea who they were. Of the 94% all said they would donate to HSUS based on what they knew about them. I'm betting HSUS is banking, literally, on these types of individuals.

    I also went online and found some rather interesting, at times quite scary, information on several web sites. I would have interviewed a HSUS representative, but after last week's newsletter, I got an email from one that was little more than hate mail and very offensive!

    Founders

    Coleman Burke, then president of the American Bible Society, Cleveland Amory and Helen Jones, founded HSUS in 1954. As far as I have been able to tell, Mr. Burke served as their President until 1970 when John Hoyt, a Presbyterian minister, took over as President and CEO until 1996. Until just a few months ago, the President and CEO was Paul Irwin, a Methodist minister. The current CEO and President is Wayne Pacelle who admittedly has had ties with some radical (and I mean radical) animal rights groups in the past.

    Now, is it important I mention the religious background? Maybe and maybe not. What I noticed though is the organization, at least to me, has an evangelical feel. Is this a bad thing? No. I don't see why unless you are running the finances in a manner similar to Jim and Tammie Faye Baker! That sure is the way it looks to me.

    Officers and Directors

    HSUS is an organization with their primary focus being animals. As I reviewed the names and titles of the Board Officers and Directors, I found it curious they had no DVM's (vets) on either. They have three MDs', three PhDs' and six attorneys. Am I the only one that finds this odd? Plenty of lawyers, but no vet. Hmmm? Maybe it's just a typo.

    Comparative Financial Operations Report

    When I conducted my interview with Kathy Bauch a few weeks ago, she refused to answer any questions regarding HSUS' finances for a "newsletter." She did offer to send me their 2003 financials though. This is what they send whenever someone has questions about their finances. As I mentioned last week, if it was similar to what they have online, it would be vague and difficult to decipher. What I got was much more.

    What I received is their 2003 Annual Report. It is a twenty-one page "report" that was obviously very expensive to print. Tucked way in the back is exactly what I expected. A vague and difficult to read one page financial report. The rest appears to me to be a very expensive sales letter and nothing more, complete with a postage paid envelope to send in your donation.

    Now you might say, "So what? They have to promote themselves." I agree. However, this publication has six pages of calendar quality photos of nothing but animals. Two and a half pages of self-glorifying articles from HSUS staff, none of which was necessary. How much donor money could have been saved by deleting this junk from the thousands and thousands of these reports they printed?

    According to the Comparative Financial Operations Report for 2003, the HSUS has $116,205,882.00 in total liability and net assets. Over $5,000,000 of that is in cash and cash equivalents, and another nearly five and a half million in receivables. They also have nearly $93,000,000 in market value investments. Not too bad.

    In 2003, in revenue, additions and transfers, HSUS made $76,923,670. Of that amount, sheltering programs received $10,551,527 and it was shared with animal habitat and wildlife programs. Now, assuming it was an even split, sheltering programs received $3,517,175.66 Now that's a lot of money, but not when you consider a good sized shelter can cost hundreds of thousands of dollars a year to run, three million is really a drop in the bucket. They spent $21,145,769.00 in fundraising and membership development. Six times what they put into their shelter programs, which is what most people I talked to think HSUS does with the money donated to them.

    Providing Help or Selling It

    I'm not sure what they spent the money on for their shelter programs, but I will assure you they didn't fund any shelters. In fact, they charge shelters and Animal Control offices for their assistance and instructional material. I have been able to find little and or nothing HSUS doesn't charge for when it comes to helping a shelter and their educational programs.

    For instance, lets say you or your town runs an animal shelter that is struggling for one reason or another, which most are, HSUS is ready to come in and help. For between $4000.00 and $20,000.00 they will send their experts to your shelter through their Animal Services Consultation Program. The fee depends on the size of the agency and the complexity of its programs, charged on a sliding scale based on your agency's resources. In other words, the more you have, the more they'll take.

    Youth Programs

    Now, lets go back to our youth. You're in middle or high school and want to start a club to promote rescue and do things to help companion animals. HSUS can help you with that, too. Just go to humaneteen.org. There you can buy a package full of all kinds of propaganda and learn to be a full-fledged animal activist. They will sell your child a club starter kit for $22.00 and then give activity suggestions like their "Fight Fur" program.

    Here they encourage kids to make flyers and hand them out in front of businesses to protest against shoppers buying fur. HSUS will also give your child cards to distribute at such events. They'll show your child pictures of dead animals in traps and direct them to other sites where they can see pictures of hunters beating seals over the head.

    They will also promote vegen/vegetarian lifestyles to your child. Just go to the message board for kids and you can read how many of the kids are distressed, after reading the material HSUS SOLD them, because their parents will not let them go vegen. You will also see posts promoting PETA!

    Now I want to be fair here. They do have some decent material that is age appropriate and educational in nature. I think it's overpriced; for instance, your child can rent a video to show their class for $25.00, but some of it is good material. However, there is little promoting appropriate training, grooming or responsible ownership of companion animals. It seems to me the whole focus is turning our children into activists, vegens and extremists.

    Now if I want my child to be a vegen, or an activist, I will make that decision and not HSUS. Our kids have enough on their plate without having to be weighed down with this information or agenda. Additionally, kids are kids and don't always make appropriate decisions. When dealing with complex issues like activism and protesting, it would be easy for them to get into trouble or hurt. Doesn't PETA target children too?

    Ethical Financial Practices

    Let's get back to the money:

    Former President John Hoyt once instructed his members on becoming more humane: "We begin, I suggest, by living more simply, more sparingly." Let's see how he did. He made around $200,000.00 in the late 1980's running HSUS. In 1986, HSUS bought his house in Maryland for $310,000 and allowed him and his family to live there, free of rent, until 1992. When he retired as CEO, HSUS gave him a $1,000,000.00 bonus.

    Paul Irwin, another former President, while making $300,000.00 from HSUS, was given an $85,000.00 interest free loan to renovate his cabin in Maine. The cabin was held in trust by HSUS, however his family continued to use it until he died. This is just the tip of the iceberg. Makes me wonder.

    Guilty by Association

    Let's look at some of HSUS' associations:

    In April of 2000 HSUS sent J.P. Goodwin as its emissary on an anti-fur mission to China. Goodwin is not just any animal rights zealot, he was an avowed member of Animal Liberation Front (ALF), a group once called one of the biggest domestic terrorist organizations by the FBI. He had been convicted for vandalism of several fur retailers and their property. Less than a year later, he was formerly identified as a HSUS legislative staff member.

    Then, there is the PETA connection..

    HSUS has repeatedly hired PETA employees in their organization. Their head of investigations, several investigators, a computer programmer, just to name a few. Sorry folks, my opinion is, once a terrorist, always a terrorist. When HSUS hires these people, they appear to support the crimes these individuals may have been involved in. In 2003, HSUS VP Martin Stephens was asked to recommend three people to serve on an EPA "pollution prevention and toxics" panel. Two of his three choices were PETA employees.

    All Talk and No Action

    While HSUS will admit they don't run or fund any shelters, you usually find it at the bottom of the page or tucked away somewhere near the end of a statement. As I mentioned before, they don't put their money where their mouth is. Get this.. In 1995, when the Washington DC animal shelter was going to have to close due to a budget shortfall, HSUS (based in DC) offered to build and operate a DC shelter at its own expense to serve as a national model. There were, of course, conditions.

    HSUS wanted the city to give it 3-5 acres of land and tax exempt status for all of its real estate holdings in the District of Columbia. Remember, they buy some executives homes to live in among other property holdings.

    The DC government offered a long-term lease but HSUS refused to proceed unless it would "own absolutely" the land. The district declined, and the only HSUS funded animal shelter never materialized.

    HSUS, who makes and has enough money to fund a shelter in every state, as well as subsidize spay/neuter programs, declined to help the dogs in its own back yard. Why? Money is all I can think of. Perhaps they were afraid they would soil their Armani suits by actually working with a dog.

    The New CEO

    Rather than go on a tirade about the new President and CEO of HSUS, I have put some quotes from him below. Read them, and you decide.

    "I think they wanted the aggressive approach," he says. "They wanted someone who was going to think things up. And they got him." June 2004, Washington Post when asked about his selection as CEO.

    "We have no problem with the extinction of domestic animals. They are creations of human selective breeding." Quoted in Animal People, May, 1993

    Overview

    I could go on for days about HSUS, but I will stop here. In my opinion, they are little more than an organization whose main agenda is filling the coffers and pushing an extremist agenda through misinformation and exploitation. Again, my opinion, they have done nothing but profit from the contributions of people who don't know any better. I have tried to see it otherwise, I simply can't.

    I highly recommend you go to activistcash.com and see what they have there about HSUS and their connection with PETA. There are several other sites I found interesting, as well as many stories about HSUS in the archive of the Washington Post.

    Would I give anything to the Humane Society of the United States? Yes I would. A pooper-scooper, they can use to go clean my yard. At least then we would know they actually have done something for a dog this year.

    Quick Links...

    Jim Beers Common Sense

    The U.S. Sportsmen's Alliance

    National Rifle Association

    National Animal Interest Alliance

    PETA Kills Animals

    Ted Nugent

    The Daily Judge

    The Granny Warriors

    The Hidden Enemy

    Target Of Opportunity

    Animal Scam

    No NAIS

    Animal Crackers

    The GameFowl News Website

    Donate To GameFowl News

    Central-Californians-Against-Nais

    Activist Cash

    PeTA Sucks



    Join our mailing list!